chorpler still hasn’t responded how he reads a paper book in the shower.
guizot said:
Depends upon how you acquired the stripped book. If you found it in the street, picked it up and then noticed the notice, it really isn’t going to hurt anyone to read it before you pitch it. Unless it has cooties[sup]1[/sup] from lying in the street.
If you come across some guy at a flea market selling a pile of coverless books, you shouldn’t buy from him. He’s a thief. Yeah, a petty, low-level thief, but still a thief. But then so is a bootleg copy of a movie, and there are plenty of people who wouldn’t steal a DVD from a store but will buy a bootleg DVD at discount price, so there you go.
If [sup]2[/sup] you come across a bookstore or pharmacy or convenience store selling books without covers, then you should report them to the publisher. Sending a nice quick letter (or email if you can find a webpage with address) and let them know the store and location. Then they can investigate and take whatever repercussions they desire.
It probably won’t do any good to contact the local police. I’m not sure if it fits their jurisdiction, or if they will take any interest.
Exapno Mapcase said:
I assume you are talking about a situation where someone is selling a book and you realize they work for WaldenNoble’s. If you actually find them on sale at WaldenNoble’s, then the manager probably already knows, and telling him won’t do much.
DrDeth said:
Is your recycling set out on the front curb in high foot traffic and visibility? Or behind the store in the alleyway with the dumpster? Is there much risk of a string of patrons walking around to the back of the store to rummage your dumpster/recycle bin for bargains? I think you are complying with the intent of the disposal law - you are disposing of them rather than selling them or giving them away free to customers as door prizes.
DrDeth said:
Only as much as you hurt the author when you borrow a copy from a friend rather than buy a new copy. Or borrow it from the library. As long as you wouldn’t buy it at all anyway, and you don’t sell it, there is no impact to the author.
**Mr. Slant ** said:
There’s a chance that in the future, you’ll decide to pay for it and read it.
True, but also true is that you could read it and decide that you like the book and buy a copy, or decide you like the author and buy another book by that author because you read their work. That is part of why Baen gives free electronic books. They think people will get hooked buy reading the free electronic copies and then buy the other books in the series’. YMMV.
**guizot ** said:
Well, yes, but the question is whether I hurt the author by reading the book before destroying it. Let’s assume that it’s a book I wouldn’t pay cover price for. But someone says,“Here, this is a cheap book to pass your time on the subway,” so I buy it at a cheap price. Then I see that the cover’s been stripped, and that the publisher is saying that I’ve bought a stripped book. It was just a means of getting rid of something that wouldn’t’ve resulted in anything different.
If you didn’t know it was stolen before you bought it, then it isn’t really going to hurt anyone for you to read it then pitch it. Economically, the case can be made that reading it makes it more likely you will buy something from that author in the future, so it is something of a wash whether the remote possibility you would pay for that book in the future ethically balances the remote possibility you would read the book and decide to buy a new copy or buy something else by that author. Yes, technically, you are receiving stolen property, so how strict is your ethical meter?
As explained before, nowadays picking up the one-off book here and there without a cover is not something that authors or publishers worry much about. They are concerned about large-scale theft that was predominant years ago, but fairly rare nowadays.
acsenray said:
Replace “book” with “B.M.W.” Someone illegally acquires a B.M.W. and sells it to you on the cheap. Are you harming anyone by keeping it?
The situations are not equivalent.
**acsenray ** said:
Party A: I will pay Party B $X for this car. All I want is to destroy this car, so I’ll trust Party B to take it to the crusher.
Party B: Takes the money but instead sells guizot the car.
Not quite the same. Here is the situation:
BMW: Party A, sell this car for me and pay me $X for every one sold, or send me the driver’s floor mat as proof you destroyed the car.
Party A: I didn’t sell the car. Here is the driver’s floor mat, so I don’t owe you any money. Hey, Party B, want to buy a new BMW? It’s just missing the floor mat.
Arguably, if BMW really wants to ensure Party A doesn’t cheat them, they will require more than just the floor mat as proof it didn’t sell. The fact that BMW pays out on such flimsy evidence is very naive. But the expense of making a BMW vastly exceeds the cost to ship one around from place to place. The margins on books are a lot thinner.
[sup]1[/sup] Okay, sticky pages, oil, whatever.
[sup]2[/sup] I did say if.