No. The name itself provides the reason why: it’s a personality disorder. Thus, the person has to have a set personality for it to be viable as a diagnosis. Indeed, the criteria states “beginning by early adulthood” which is accepted as being 18-20.
One can say (and I see it a good bit at work, since I’m with the under-18 set) “displays characteristics consistent with a diagnosis of…” or “BP traits” but I would be very wary of any professional who pegged anyone under the age of 20 or so with any of the personality disorders, and I don’t see that changing any time in the future (the latest clash is over the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in children, and I think that’ll keep folks busy for a while).
For those who don’t have a handy-dandy DSM, or who don’t want to go poking around, here is the criteria for a BPD patient:
-
Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment (do not include suicidal or self-mutilating behavior covered in criterion 5).
-
A pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation.
-
Identity disturbance; markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self.
-
Impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (spending, sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, binge eating). (do not include suicidal or self-mutilating behavior covered in criterion 5)
-
Recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, or threats, or self-mutilating behavior.
-
Affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (intense episodic dysphoria, irritability, or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days).
-
Chronic feelings of emptiness.
-
Inappropriate, intense anger or difficulty controlling anger (frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights).
-
Transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms.
For a proper diagnosis, they must present with five or more of the above issues, and those things MUST result in a “pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, and affect, and marked impulsivity beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts.” So if someone does just fine at work and church and school and all other public outings, no problems, everyone loves them, etc., but their home life is a shambles, they’re likely not borderline.
Now, I’m one of the folks who can’t stand borderlines. I think people above have really nailed why, but I’ll just toss my .02 in anyway. It’s the black, sucking, never-ending, vortex of NEEEEEEEED that these patients typically embody. The sudden complete regression when you tell them how well they’re doing. The constantly shifting perception of you, sometimes several times in the same session (YOU’RE THE BEST THERAPIST EVER YOU FUCKING SHITHEAD WHY DO YOU HATE ME??). Making the same dumbass mistakes over and over and over and over and over and over, and never taking any responsibility for it (woke up next to some random guy in a crackhouse? with no sign of your clothes? no idea what or who you did in the past 36 hours? really? and it’s the 6th time in the past two months? well, good for you! :rolleyes: ). The threats, the suicide attempts (I’m going to take 2 aspirin and drink this bottle of wine, but before I’m done I’ll call 911 so they find me in plenty of time!), the bouts of anger that lead to throwing and breaking things (which leads to buying more things- yay for shopping with money I don’t have!!). And the lies. Good god, the lies.
Personality disorders are tough to treat with medication; the majority of the issues they present with are actually traits, which have to be treated by replacing the negative behavior with positive behavior. The symptoms can typically be treated medicinally- anxiety, depression, things like that- but you have to couple it with behavioral therapy. Most folks respond well to this… BPDs almost never. The dialectical therapy does seem to be having some success- more than most things I’ve seen in the past, at least. So perhaps there’s still some hope.
My sister in law (brother’s wife) is BPD from hell, and has made my entire family miserable for the past 15 years. Her next court date is Tuesday, where she faces charges for shoplifting and four (count 'em!) outstanding probations. We’re hoping she actually goes to jail this time, but I have a sneaking suspicion she’s going to attempt suicide again beforehand (this will be her fourth attempt that I know of). My mother in law (rest her soul) was also BPD- she decided to off herself 12 hours after her husband of 54 years had a double bypass, because god forbid someone should get more attention than her. My husband and I drew straws to see who was going to go to the hospital and break the news to my father in law.
Side note: I think the problem people are encountering with self-mutilation and mental health workers is that the population has changed so radically in the past few years. Back when I first started in the field, self-mutilation was a completely hidden thing- you’d almost never know that someone was a cutter unless they confessed it to you, and the chances of someone getting pegged with a BPD diagnosis because of it was almost non-existent. Now you have folks going on Youtube showing themselves cutting, burning, whatever, and walking around in halter tops showing off their scars. This is what’ll get you a BPD label- if you’re self-mutilating and proud of it, or self-mutilating and making sure that everyone knows your pain. A lot of the folks in MH now are used to the latter type of cutter, and as a result that’s the example they go by when doing their evaluation.