# Breeding?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [May 15, 2016, 10:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826 "2016-05-15T10:30:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![davida03801](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5e925/32.png) [@davida03801](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/davida03801)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 10:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/61 "2016-05-16T10:38:25Z")

</div>

Another question is can you find someone worthy to breed with ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_other_waldo_pepper/32/12370_2.png) [@The\_Other\_Waldo\_Pepper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Other_Waldo_Pepper)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 10:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/62 "2016-05-16T10:52:21Z")

</div>

> [@spamforbrains](#):
>
> Of course it would be a good idea to actually PROVE in some way you posses “greatness” before proceeding to clone yourself. You know, win a dozen Olympic medals in different sports, win the Nobel peace prize, and cure cancer.

In fairness, while the OP seems to have made a bunch of demonstrable mistakes in _this_ thread, I see that he posted in one [_other_](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=19331819#post19331819) thread yesterday, in which he relayed medical insights by – well, swapping in “effect” for “affect”, as well as misspelling “psychological” and “produce” and “noticeable”.

At that, it’s possible that he was just misspelling “affect”. **Papertrail** , could you do me the favor of mentioning which type of junior-high error you made with “effect”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maastricht](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a88e57/32.png) [@Maastricht](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maastricht)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 10:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/63 "2016-05-16T10:54:00Z")

</div>

**Papertrai** l, why don’t you look into the demands made by sperm banks, [like this one](http://www.spermbank.com/how-it-works/sperm-donor-requirements) ? If you’d were to become a donor, you would provide a very important service. And your genes are passed on. But beware, your future wife might have an emotional problem with you having been a donor.

> [@](#):
>
> Basic Requirements for CCB Sperm Donors
> 
> -At least 5’9’’ tall  
> -Between 19 and 38 years old  
> -Sexual partners are exclusively female  
> -Currently attending a four-year university, or already hold a bachelors or advanced degree  
> -Are in good health  
> -Legally allowed to work in the US

This article might also be informative and amusing. [6 Terrifying Things Nobody Tells You About Donating Sperm | Cracked.com](http://www.cracked.com/article_19497_6-terrifying-things-nobody-tells-you-about-donating-sperm.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 11:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/64 "2016-05-16T11:11:29Z")

</div>

> [@elfkin477](#):
>
> From reading medical journals. Where did you get the idea that it isn’t?
> 
> [intelligence and the X chromosome](http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/llog/Turner1996.pdf)
> 
> [Genes for intelligence on the X chromosome](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1016917/)
> 
> etc.

I’m confused. Let’s assume it’s true.

Man with a smart X chromosome. Boys won’t inherit it, girls will. The girls will get Daddy’s smarts, modified by whatever comes from Mom; the boys will have to look at Mom’s.

Woman with one smart and one dumb X chromosome. Half the children of each sex will inherit the smart one, half the dumb one.

Combination of the two above, the smarts are defined by a combo of both parental factors.

Woman with two equally-smart or two equally-dumb X chromosomes, the children’s smarts are defined by which chromosome they got from Daddy.

That makes the male’s contribution less relevant for the male offspring, but hey, I got my smarts from Daddy…

> [@Walken\_After\_Midnight](#):
>
> Six-time World Champion Speed Reader Anne Jones

People come up with competitions for the weirdest things… _scratches head in confusion_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 11:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/65 "2016-05-16T11:39:36Z")

</div>

> [@Walken\_After\_Midnight](#):
>
> Six-time World Champion Speed Reader Anne Jones is reported to have been clocked at 4,700 words per minute with 67% accuracy, although she says she typically reads at between 800 and 1,500 words per minute.

At nearly 80 words per second, how on earth do they measure her accuracy?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 11:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/66 "2016-05-16T11:49:10Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> At nearly 80 words per second, how on earth do they measure her accuracy?

You have to answer questions about the text once you’re finished reading it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 12:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/67 "2016-05-16T12:01:00Z")

</div>

> [@Nava](#):
>
> You have to answer questions about the text once you’re finished reading it.

So she could answer 2/3 of the questions correctly?

Gotcha. Generally when I measure students’ accuracy I’m measuring word-by-word accuracy: do they read “reading” correctly as “reading” or incorrectly as “reaching,” “reads,” or “redding”?

2/3 of questions answered makes more sense. I wonder how high-level the questions are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 12:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/68 "2016-05-16T12:22:14Z")

</div>

I think the word “accuracy” is a bit misleading here (will I get hit if I say it’s inaccurate?); it may be what’s officially used, but in our own speed-reading lessons it was called _comprensión_… understanding, comprehension. Some of the questions would specifically be worded in ways that avoided being close to the original text; there was no attempt at having people remember whether the budget for one project was USD1,353,412 or USD1,534,321 but you might be expected to remember that it was “between 1 and 2 USDM”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/69 "2016-05-16T12:48:14Z")

</div>

Gotcha–thanks! That’s the most interesting thing in this thread so far.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Winston\_Smith](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e95f7d/32.png) [@Winston\_Smith](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Winston_Smith)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 1:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/70 "2016-05-16T13:21:45Z")

</div>

I think we need more information before rushing to judgment. How old are you? What do you do for work? What are your educational credentials? Relationship status? Religious or non-religious? How are your personal finances? Are you good with money?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Why\_Child](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/b782af/32.png) [@Why\_Child](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Why_Child)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 1:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/71 "2016-05-16T13:48:13Z")

</div>

> [@Nava](#):
>
> …snip  
> People come up with competitions for the weirdest things… _scratches head in confusion_

You mean like how long you can keep a [ferret in your pants](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferret-legging) ?? 😃

Might be detrimental to the breeding…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Emiliana](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f0a364/32.png) [@Emiliana](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Emiliana)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 2:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/72 "2016-05-16T14:22:22Z")

</div>

> [@Me\_Billy](#):
>
> Being as I am also quite intelligent - more intelligent than other people. And it seems to me the general population is becoming more and more stupid with every passing day. This is the way our world is heading…
> 
> You might just be doing your potential kid a favor by not bringing him/her into this world! Frankly it is torture for me to witness such stupidity in this world - I am quite glad I am older.

And here we see the perils of self-evaluation in all their blessed glory.🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Asimovian](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asimovian/32/172_2.png) [@Asimovian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Asimovian)\
**Post date:** [May 16, 2016, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826/73 "2016-05-16T14:32:55Z")

</div>

This is probably just my lower-than-210 IQ speaking, but I’m having a hard time taking the OP seriously here. Thanks to everyone who contributed useful information in the thread, nonetheless.

Anyone who wishes to continue a discussion about passing on intelligence is welcome to start another thread on the topic. I’m closing this one.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/breeding/754826.md?page=3)
