Bricker's betting gambit

[Bricker]

@Bone

This post I agree with 100%. The method to extract the concession could be a monetary wager, but it doesn’t have to be. I am guessing that Bricker would gladly accept a wager where the losing side must post a concession that unambiguously states they were wrong.

Yes. I wouldn’t mind seeing a bit of self-flagellation, mind you, but the core issue is exactly that: an unambiguous declaration of error.

It could look like this:

@Bricker

So – I was wrong, wrong, wrong about this outcome, for a reason that I did not predict.