Bricker's betting gambit

[John_Mace]

@Czarcasm

Like I said before, if Bricker wants to count coup it’s no skin off my nose-it was the hijacking of conversations to work out the details about the bet that irked me.

Yep, that sums up my take as well. I have no problem with the “betting gambit” (done it myself a number of times), but please take any discussions about the value of betting elsewhere.

[brazil84]

There’s a noticeable problem with people saying stuff for purposes of moral and intellectual preening, or to save face, even if deep down they don’t seriously believe (or don’t even understand) the position they are taking.

Bet challenges do shine a light on this conduct.

[Czarcasm]

@brazil84

There’s a noticeable problem with people saying stuff for purposes of moral and intellectual preening, or to save face, even if deep down they don’t seriously believe (or don’t even understand) the position they are taking.

Bet challenges do shine a light on this conduct.

Do you do this in real life conversations very often-introduce betting to make people back up their statements?

[Bricker]

@Bryan_Ekers

As someone with some training in statistical analysis, I point out the error in this. “Any given discussion” means any random discussion, while the discussions you engage in are by definition self-selected. For your statement to have meaning, we should tally the results of you being dropped into a random sample of discussions, not only in GD, but in the Cafe, IMHO, GQ, etc. We’d have to rely on your honesty in venturing your opinion on the topic (i.e. not reading the thread and posting something deliberately contrary to the consensus just to provoke a “ten to one” reaction), but I guess it could be worked out.

Or by "any given discussion: did you mean “any given discussion in which I have engaged” ? Considering this discussion is about making people face (“forcing” them, as it were) the inaccuracies in their claims, I daresay this calls for clarification.

How dare you? I talk about my feelings, and you introduce facts, and statistics, and stuff? That’s a deliberate attempt to minimize my feelings and unvalidate my worth as a person, and it’s probably classist too – not everyone can afford your fancy “training” in “statistical” “analysis.”

[Marley23]

Mercy-killing this thread.