# Britons; what are you expecting when Charles becomes King?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [January 2, 2022, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061 "2022-01-02T02:19:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/181 "2022-01-06T17:39:16Z")

</div>

Though, Googling, a majority of the population of Wales doesn’t speak Welsh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 5:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/182 "2022-01-06T17:47:00Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> Without both of these conditions, I think there would be very strong resistance in Wales to having any member of the royal family appointed Prince of Wales.

Wouldn’t it be a major break in tradition if William wasn’t named Prince of Wales? While it’s not a legal requirement for the succession, the title has been used as a sign of the heir for over seven hundred years now. If William does not receive it, there will be a lot of speculation about him being cut out of the line of succession. Even if the speculation is baseless, why create a situation that feeds it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hypno-Toad](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/b2d939/32.png) [@Hypno-Toad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hypno-Toad)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/183 "2022-01-06T18:03:17Z")

</div>

Maybe Charles and Camilla will sneak off to a Justice of the Peace and get crowned in a little Civil ceremony.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/184 "2022-01-06T18:07:16Z")

</div>

It’s quite common for there to be no Prince of Wales. As far as I can tell from Wikipedia, no one held the title between Edward VIII’s ascension in 1936 and 1958, when Prince Charles was made Prince of Wales. Elizabeth was never Princess of Wales, nor was George VI.

And while it’s true that the majority in Wales are not fluent in Welsh, it’s still a very important issue in the country. [https://www.thenational.wales/news/19582819.right-want-another-prince-wales/](https://www.thenational.wales/news/19582819.right-want-another-prince-wales/), an article from September, has a pretty good if brief overview of all the issues: there is general support of William becoming Prince of Wales, there is not general support for an alternative, it’s still a fraught issue, the Nationalists and Plaid Cymru are certain to make a big stink around it. Note that the article specifically notes that Welsh-speakers support William’s becoming Prince of Wales: they’re a minority, but a significant one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/185 "2022-01-06T18:22:07Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> It’s quite common for there to be no Prince of Wales. As far as I can tell from Wikipedia, no one held the title between Edward VIII’s ascension in 1936 and 1958, when Prince Charles was made Prince of Wales. Elizabeth was never Princess of Wales, nor was George VI.

Elizabeth and George weren’t heirs apparent. They were heirs presumptive.

When was the last time an heir apparent wasn’t named Prince of Wales? Was it Edward III?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mk\_VII](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Mk\_VII](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mk_VII)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/186 "2022-01-06T18:25:41Z")

</div>

The stamps will be changed fairly quickly. The coins will take longer (a year or so). Other heraldry may take a while.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/187 "2022-01-06T18:28:51Z")

</div>

Dumb question from an American; what’s the difference between “heir apparent” and “heir presumptive”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/188 "2022-01-06T18:32:13Z")

</div>

I don’t know, but you’re correct that all the heirs apparent since at least the Act of Union have also been made Prince of Wales, with occasional delays for younger kids. I had never realized that this distinction factored in: thanks for pointing it out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/189 "2022-01-06T18:33:03Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> Dumb question from an American; what’s the difference between “heir apparent” and “heir presumptive”?

Possibility, however remote, of any newborn getting ahead of an heir presumptive; if no possibility, then the next in line is heir apparent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/190 "2022-01-06T18:35:05Z")

</div>

A “heir presumptive” is someone who might, between now and the death of the current monarch, be leapfrogged by a new royal. So Elizabeth II was “heir presumptive” because it was technically possible that George VI might have had a son, even though it was more than a little unlikely that her mother (in her late 40s / early 50s) was going to produce a legitimate male heir that last decade.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/191 "2022-01-06T18:37:09Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> Dumb question from an American; what’s the difference between “heir apparent” and “heir presumptive”?

An heir apparent is the current monarch’s oldest son; this person is guaranteed the first spot in the line of succession as long as they live.

An heir presumptive is somebody who is currently in the first spot in the line of succession but who could be displaced if another child is born.

When Edward was king, he had no children. So his younger brother George was the heir presumptive. If Edward had remained king and had a son, that son would have become the heir apparent.

Elizabeth was a girl. She was first in line but would have lost her spot if her father (or her uncle if he had remained king) had had a son. Under the laws at the time, sons succeed before daughters, even if the daughter is older. (This law has since been changed.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 6:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/192 "2022-01-06T18:51:57Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> Dumb question from an American; what’s the difference between “heir apparent” and “heir presumptive”?

Heir presumptive is _currently_ the first in succession but could be knocked out of position by e birth of someone with higher priority Example: a monarch’s nephew, who could be knocked out of place if the monarch has a child. Or the monarch’s eldest daughter, who could be knocked out of place if the monarch has a son.

Heir apparent is the legal first in line who cant be knocked out of place. Usually the monarch’s eldest son.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PatrickLondon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/patricklondon/32/4422_2.png) [@PatrickLondon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PatrickLondon)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 7:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/193 "2022-01-06T19:02:58Z")

</div>

> [@Peter\_Morris](#):
>
> Usually the monarch’s eldest son.

Eldest child, since the [law changed in 2013](https://www.royal.uk/succession), though (barring accidents) this would make no practical difference for the next three generations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carrps](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carrps/32/2957_2.png) [@carrps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carrps)\
**Post date:** [January 6, 2022, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/194 "2022-01-06T21:19:21Z")

</div>

My vote is for Sandra Schmirler.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AK84](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/85e7bf/32.png) [@AK84](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AK84)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 3:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/195 "2022-01-07T03:53:56Z")

</div>

She had a young family. He won’t (probably).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 7:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/196 "2022-01-07T07:49:45Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> It’s quite common for there to be no Prince of Wales.

The Prince of Whales ! (Hulk saves the whales from puny Russian whalers!)

[![](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/7rQAAOSw1h5dgQbl/s-l1600.jpg) ](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/7rQAAOSw1h5dgQbl/s-l1600.jpg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 7:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/197 "2022-01-07T07:56:41Z")

</div>

Okay, next question: Why is the heir apparent called the heir apparent? If he/she can’t be displaced from next-in-line, why be called “apparent”? Why not simply be called the heir? (Assuming said heir actually outlives the current monarch?) (And isn’t deposed? And doesn’t pre-abdicate?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Senegoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/senegoid/32/6606_2.png) [@Senegoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Senegoid)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/198 "2022-01-07T08:13:19Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> Quick word question: a couple of people in this thread have used the word “coronated.” Is this correct, or tongue-in-cheek?

> [@Little\_Nemo](#):
>
> Coronated is a [real word](https://www.dictionary.com/browse/coronated#:~:text=adjective,to%20crown%20(a%20sovereign).).

Coronated does sound a bit awkward, at least to the American ear, I think. Perhaps because the word doesn’t see much usage in these parts. We don’t coronate much around here.

The word may also be awkward because it brings to mind other such odd words as _coruscated_ and _consternated_. See, for example:

> [@My patient's bizarre penis](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/my-patients-bizarre-penis/262329/1):
>
> Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan, Aug. 30, 2004:
> 
> One of our new inmates was seen by my Physician Assistant last week for a general physical. During the exam, my assistant was surprised and consternated (despite 20 years of practice in the field) by the patient’s penis. So he referred him to _me_ . It has been a long time since I have been surprised by anything a patient might do, or consternated by a genital exam. Repulsed, yes. Consternated, no.

And see also:

> **[Find all words that end with ATED](https://www.morewords.com/words-that-end-with/ated)**
>
> Find all words that end with ATED and further filter the results in the advanced options!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SanVito](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sanvito/32/2805_2.png) [@SanVito](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SanVito)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/199 "2022-01-07T08:46:15Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> And while it’s true that the majority in Wales are not fluent in Welsh, it’s still a very important issue in the country. [Are we right to want another Prince of Wales? | The National Wales](https://www.thenational.wales/news/19582819.right-want-another-prince-wales/), an article from September, has a pretty good if brief overview of all the issues: there is general support of William becoming Prince of Wales, there is not general support for an alternative, it’s still a fraught issue, the Nationalists and Plaid Cymru are certain to make a big stink around it. Note that the article specifically notes that Welsh-speakers support William’s becoming Prince of Wales: they’re a minority, but a significant one.

And all of this is irrelevant anyway. The Monarchy is not a democracy, the Welsh people don’t get to choose, and Prince William will be made Prince of Wales by Charles when he ascends to the throne. The whole show is about history and tradition - this particular 700 year old tradition isn’t going to change. Plaid Cymru are not going to ‘make a stink about it’ - they are perfectly respectful of the Prince of Wales, and William is a popular guy who lived in Wales during the early part of his marriage.

(For the record, roughly 20% of the Welsh people speak Welsh ‘as a first language’. Most of the rest have a smattering of the language as it’s now taught in all Welsh schools - my wife uses Welsh for certain phrases without thinking about it.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SanVito](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sanvito/32/2805_2.png) [@SanVito](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SanVito)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 8:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061/200 "2022-01-07T08:48:45Z")

</div>

> [@Senegoid](#):
>
> Okay, next question: Why is the heir apparent called the heir apparent? If he/she can’t be displaced from next-in-line, why be called “apparent”? Why not simply be called the heir?

Because it makes it clearer - language is wonderful like that. All heirs are not equal.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061.md?page=9)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/britons-what-are-you-expecting-when-charles-becomes-king/957061.md?page=11)
