# Brits:  If them yanks can play chess on here, then we can play Mornington Crescent!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [March 7, 2005, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344 "2005-03-07T12:58:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/61 "2005-03-08T23:13:20Z")

</div>

Indulgence on 1-2?

Doesn’t that introduce the Metropolitan Elite?  
**Chalfont & Latimer**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ianzin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/ed655f/32.png) [@ianzin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ianzin)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/62 "2005-03-08T23:18:43Z")

</div>

> [@TheLoadedDog](#):
>
> (Simpson vs Takahashi, Berlin 1983)

Sorry for the nitpick, but I think you mean **Tahakashi**. Otherwise, a very elegant and inspired move, if I may say so.

Incidentally, Berlin '83 was the only time I actually saw the amazing **Ffunz** play live. I know he was way past his prime by then, and he went out in the last 16, but still… just to see this legend of the game actually in the flesh was quite an inspiring moment. The nice thing is that he retained his infectious enthusiasm for the game right to the end.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/63 "2005-03-08T23:25:14Z")

</div>

I’m sorry, but I’m not going to accept **Ffnuz** being mentioned. Shot-putters full of steroids was one thing, but having three dozen Soviet metropolises _burnt onto his retina_ really cannot be defended, even by the most stringent application of the 1922 Definitive Rules (Amendments).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ianzin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/ed655f/32.png) [@ianzin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ianzin)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/64 "2005-03-08T23:49:11Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> but having three dozen Soviet metropolises _burnt onto his retina_ really cannot be defended

I knew someone would drag up that old controversy. \* sigh \* Look, this isn’t really the time or place for an in-depth debate, but in a nutshell: (1) all the various ‘etched retina’ accusations can be traced back to Schkopfel’s book; (2) Schkopfel presented lots of idle speculation and conjecture but _no evidence_, apart from a single copy of what was alleged to be a relevant surgical record, but its validity was never proved; (3) Ffunz consistently denied the accusations, even when he had nothing to lose by admitting the truth; (4) even if the accusations were true, greatness in MC isn’t about knowing or memorising the names of the stations, it’s about the brilliance of the moves and the intellectual challenge of the game’s multi-level strategical considerations.

Let’s not forget, Ffunz _crucified_ Schkopfel in the 82 European Open, with a stunning 9-1 victory that is still the widest winning margin in European Masters tournament play. Great players win matches. Bad losers write books - books full of fanciful and unsubstantiated accusations.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e19b73/32.png) [@garius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garius)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/65 "2005-03-08T23:53:08Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> Sorry, but **Leaves on the Track** is eliminated by the **2002 PFI Implementation Protocol** (surely you’ve not forgotten Ken’s expletive-ridden interruption of the round-table discussion?). So I claim a free Oyster card, and call **Debden**.

Err… yeah… BOLLOCKS

the only people who hold to that are people who read the Sun’s Mornington column.

Last time i checked (and much as i hate pulling rank and speaking as an ex-world champion) we’ve NEVER played according to Murdock’s rules in professional games.

**Leaves on the track** still stands.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Iceland\_Blue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/4bbf92/32.png) [@Iceland\_Blue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Iceland_Blue)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/66 "2005-03-08T23:53:22Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> I’m sorry, but I’m not going to accept **Ffnuz** being mentioned.

Good cos nobody mentioned him.We were discussing **Ffunz**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/67 "2005-03-08T23:53:59Z")

</div>

Nothing in your defence is anything that didn’t appear in _Shnostcovnicsh Reconvened_. And the '82 Open is no good example - there was the boycot by the entire South-Western Aspect, along with the bizarre insistence on application of ruling judgements prior to decisive implementations of such decisions. I cannot believe you could argue that this wasn’t an insult to the traditional Banhumlian nature of the game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/68 "2005-03-08T23:55:11Z")

</div>

> [@garius](#):
>
> Err… yeah… BOLLOCKS
> 
> the only people who hold to that are people who read the Sun’s Mornington column.
> 
> Last time i checked (and much as i hate pulling rank and speaking as an ex-world champion) we’ve NEVER played according to Murdock’s rules in professional games.
> 
> **Leaves on the track** still stands.

Do I need to quote from the 1981 Morning Star? I hoped such an embarassment could be avoided.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e19b73/32.png) [@garius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garius)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2005, 11:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/69 "2005-03-08T23:58:49Z")

</div>

> [@GorillaMan](#):
>
> Do I need to quote from the 1981 Morning Star? I hoped such an embarassment could be avoided.

Yeah, go on then.

Last time i checked you were wrong. There’s nothing wrong with you admitting that - it doesn’t make you any less of a player or mean that i respect you any less.

Hell, who do you think it was who nominated you as best newcomer 1986? it certainly wasn’t **owl**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 12:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/70 "2005-03-09T00:06:55Z")

</div>

I still resent acquiring the title ‘newcomer’ just because I’d entered the seventy-third tier of competitive play. So much ingenuity goes undiscovered in those lower-middle leagues, that it’s a shame so much focus is given to the upper dozen or so international disciplines.

**Farringdon**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 12:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/71 "2005-03-09T00:24:12Z")

</div>

OK. I got ahold of a copy of _Mornington Crescent For the Easily Confused_ by Artax Piffany (3rd Edition, revised). If I am following his suggestions right, the next move should be to try the Yeager-Nodwick Gambit, and play\*\* Snaresbrook\*\*.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paperbackwriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/53a042/32.png) [@paperbackwriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/paperbackwriter)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 12:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/72 "2005-03-09T00:27:09Z")

</div>

If you’ll allow another Yank drive-by move.

I’m assuming Snaresbrook has been played under the proposed Buenas Aires Protocol, which, if I remember correctly, has been acceded to by the Northern Conference. With that, the Islington Variation on the Ashmolean Gamble would suggest **Theydon Bois** , would it not?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 12:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/73 "2005-03-09T00:28:04Z")

</div>

> [@TheLoadedDog](#):
>
> You do realise what you’ve gone and done, don’t you? Now I can play the _Commissioner’s Exemption_ (Simpson vs Takahashi, Berlin 1983) on a semi-strile, by moving **Bank**. You are in brabbers for the next two moves now, unless you can somehow manage a reverse half-shunt and the loss of a blue token. Too easy.

I’ve decided that you guys are making this up as you go.

**Foggy Bottom / GWU**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ianzin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/ed655f/32.png) [@ianzin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ianzin)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 12:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/74 "2005-03-09T00:33:20Z")

</div>

> [@paperbackwriter](#):
>
> **Theydon Bois**

Ha! I declare Barracks, and then announce _Mornington Crescent or a draw in four moves at most, against any defence_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paperbackwriter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/53a042/32.png) [@paperbackwriter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/paperbackwriter)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/75 "2005-03-09T03:10:14Z")

</div>

I was afraid you were correct, and that I had sunk this game with a drive-by. Ashamed that I might have wasted the efforts of the other players, I plundered my resources, and finally found a similar situation from the West African Regionals held in 1954 in Ouagadougou in what is today Burkina Faso. I would hesitate to bring up such an obscure match, were it not for the fact that the judge in that match was the distinguished L’Confus. Not entirely surprising, I suppose, when one remembers that Burkina Faso was then a French colony, but I digress.

All hemming and hawing aside, the move that Mr. Joseph Ki-Zerbo came up with, to prevent nearly an identical win in such a situation, was the lightly-traveled and seldom-played **Roding Valley** , which I will emulate here. I think you will find it prevents an unfortunately early termination to this game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GorillaMan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/50afbb/32.png) [@GorillaMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GorillaMan)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 7:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/76 "2005-03-09T07:42:38Z")

</div>

It certainly does, I can see this going on for some time, if I keep us locked into that half-spiral with **Grange Hill**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![garius](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e19b73/32.png) [@garius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/garius)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 10:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/77 "2005-03-09T10:39:46Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> It certainly does, I can see this going on for some time, if I keep us locked into that half-spiral with Grange Hill

Rookie mistake 😃

I move to **Byker Grove**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![owlstretchingtime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/958977/32.png) [@owlstretchingtime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/owlstretchingtime)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 11:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/78 "2005-03-09T11:24:39Z")

</div>

I had a horrible suspicion this would cause rancour and acrimony.

Gentlemen: Please try to remember that Morington is a game for gentlemen played by gentlemen to gentlemen’s rules. At least it is in England - Aussie Rules MC is obviously for herberts.

Now please calm down and avoid frankly emotional moves like the one above. I realise that you are upset - and who can blame you, but that’s no reason to lower yourself to the lowest common denominator.

Remember, as the Arch Bishop himself said "_dulce et decorum est Morninton Cresent ludare_ "

So as a calming move, I am rolling the doubles to:

**Arnos grove**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Creative\_Munster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/919ad9/32.png) [@Creative\_Munster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Creative_Munster)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 12:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/79 "2005-03-09T12:14:59Z")

</div>

What does nid mean actually? Is it an acronym?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Iceland\_Blue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/4bbf92/32.png) [@Iceland\_Blue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Iceland_Blue)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2005, 1:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344/80 "2005-03-09T13:45:39Z")

</div>

Of course.It stands for New International Development which was formalized in 1980 and means that any bilateral sweep can be cut off by placing an Inner Zone station after it.  
Oh what the…it’s easier to show than to explain.

owl played a bilateral sweep to **Arnos Grove** ,so I can cut him off by placing an Inner Zone station.The best one is **Mansion House**  
owl is now in NID.  
See? 😃

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/brits-if-them-yanks-can-play-chess-on-here-then-we-can-play-mornington-crescent/293344.md?page=5)
