# Burning books in the US...'Burn Quran Day'

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 20, 2010, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891 "2010-08-20T17:58:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2010, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/581 "2010-09-06T22:18:23Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> Ah, which is different than their book telling them to kill or convert me the first chance they get?

Yes. Look, Muslims believe the Quran is a holy book written by God, so they can’t change it, because if they change it, that would be them denying the holy nature and divine authorship of the book, which would call into question the entire truth of Islam. So they’re not going to do that.

But the more pertinent question isn’t what the Quran says. The question is what Muslims believe, and what Muslims believe is only partly influenced by what the Quran says. It’s also influenced by the society in which Muslims live, and there are a whole lot of Muslims who don’t think you should be killed or forcibly converted (although if you voluntarily convert, they’ll still be glad to have you).

It’s like how the Christian bible has all sorts of stuff in it about stoning adulterers to death, and how everyone who’s not Christian is damned, and how it’s ok to own slaves, but most modern Christians in America, even though they believe the Bible is the word of God and would never cut out those parts of the bible, don’t keep slaves or stone adulterers or run around saying that people are going to hell.

That’s how religions work. They ignore or reinterpret the parts of their holy books that no longer work in the society in which they exist. The problem with burning the Quran is that not only do you piss off the Muslims who think you should be killed or forcibly converted, you’ll also piss off all the Muslims who don’t think you should be killed or forcibly converted, because you’re destroying the book that they think is sacred too. And, do you really want to piss them off? Wouldn’t it be smarter to get them on your side against the people who think you should be forcibly converted or killed? The cause of freedom and tolerance has enough enemies that it doesn’t need to piss off its allies or people who could be its allies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2010, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/582 "2010-09-06T22:41:01Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> And I am also saying that as long as the book exists in its present form, people will continue to use it for the evil they do. The same goes for Christians who use the bible to justify their hatred of gays, etc. Remove or change the passages that justify their hatred and they don’t have legs to stand upon.

I’d tend to say that you could have the nicest possible holy book imaginable - “Free hugs and give lots of money to charity” and all that kind of thing - and people who wanted to cause violence and wanted a rationale would be perfectly able to conjure themselves up that rationale from that book.

As much as it might be nice for us to think “Ah, it is the _book’s_ fault. Without the bad words, people will be unable to do bad things! Gotcha!” the desire to do bad things arises from _us_. There is no text so excellently written nor full of love and happiness and puppies that a motivated person cannot derive “Yes, you may go out and kill/rape/steal” from.

I mean, shit, look at us athiests. We don’t have any holy books at all. Yet we’ve managed to do all those unpleasant things. Humans don’t need encouragement, and will ignore chastisement. It’s what we do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2010, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/583 "2010-09-06T23:24:01Z")

</div>

Why should I worry about what is in the Koran when the people in this thread can’t even read what I have written and parse it correctly.

[QUOTE=Revenant Threshold]  
I’d tend to say that you could have the nicest possible holy book imaginable - “Free hugs and give lots of money to charity” and all that kind of thing - and people who wanted to cause violence and wanted a rationale would be perfectly able to conjure themselves up that rationale from that book.  
[/QUOTE]

I said the essentially the same thing part way through this thread. But it makes it easier when you know god wants you to kill others when you’re doing it, doesn’t it?

[QUOTE=Captain Amazing]  
But the more pertinent question isn’t what the Quran says. The question is what Muslims believe, and what Muslims believe is only **partly influenced** by what the Quran says. It’s also influenced by the society in which Muslims live, and there are a whole lot of Muslims who don’t think you should be killed or forcibly converted (although if you voluntarily convert, they’ll still be glad to have you).  
[/QUOTE]

Finally, someone admits that the holy book in question CAN influence the behavior of its followers.

> [@](#):
>
> And, do you really want to piss them off?

Why not? It gives everyone a chance to talk about free speech and why it is far, far more important than some questionable holy book that people seem to pick and choose from given the situation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2010, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/584 "2010-09-06T23:31:22Z")

</div>

> [@qpw3141](#):
>
> The problem is with the way certain people obsess about it.
> 
> Can you imagine if someone pointed out that every US president who took their country into war was a Christian and on that basis Christianity was in some way evil?

I can imagine if a single US president threatened to wipe another country off the map while discussing the second coming of Jesus it would make the papers.

> [@qpw3141](#):
>
> Picking some identifying attribute and making lists of undesirable actions by people who happen to share that attribute is the action of a rabble rouser, not a serious debater.

Picking poverty as an identifying attribute may explain rioting for a day, or even a couple of days. It does not explain the year long riots in France. The reality that there is an Islamic connection can be seen in the [The Union of French Islamic Organizations](http://www.islamopediaonline.org/news/french-fatwa-condemns-riot-violence) which issued a fatwa addressing the riots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2010, 11:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/585 "2010-09-06T23:45:42Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> Why not? It gives everyone a chance to talk about free speech and why it is far, far more important than some questionable holy book that people seem to pick and choose from given the situation.

Because that’s not how conversations like that go, and I think you know that. When people are upset they don’t care about free speech. You burn a Quran, most Muslims aren’t going to think to themselves, “Oh, that person burned a Quran. Well, I guess in a liberal society, it’s important that the rights of someone to do something offensive be protected.” They’re going to think, “I can’t believe this person is burning a Quran. It just goes to show how much people hate Muslims.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 12:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/586 "2010-09-07T00:33:09Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> The reality that there is an Islamic connection can be seen in the [The Union of French Islamic Organizations](http://www.islamopediaonline.org/news/french-fatwa-condemns-riot-violence) which issued a fatwa addressing the riots.

No. According to your link, Sarkozy was making vague claims–without providing any evidence–and the Islamic leaders issued a _fatwah_ condemning the rioting to head off any more such silly claims.

> [@](#):
>
> Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy and other officials have been hinting that some Muslim groups may be involved in inciting angry teenagers to defy the French state. Muslim residents, who are also affected by the unrest in the poorer, neglected suburbs, say rioters’ anger is more about unemployment and discrimination than religion.

> [@](#):
>
> The government acknowledged that the grim conditions in the suburbs - chronic high unemployment, racial discrimination, miserable housing, drugs - had much to do with the discontent.

Sarkozy is quite happy to play the scapgoat card–as he has done recently regarding the Roma–and until he provides actual evidence of his claims, you are simply repeating his evidence-free nonsense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 12:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/587 "2010-09-07T00:36:46Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
>
> You burn a Quran, most Muslims aren’t going to think to themselves, “Oh, that person burned a Quran. Well, I guess in a liberal society, it’s important that the rights of someone to do something offensive be protected.” They’re going to think, “I can’t believe this person is burning a Quran. It just goes to show how much people hate Muslims.”

And this same person who thinks like this is going to differentiate between the context of when the Koran was written and society today as has been intimated in this thread? Well, which is it? Deep thinkers that can put things into historical context, or simpletons who don’t understand the importance of free speech?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 1:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/588 "2010-09-07T01:13:03Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> No. According to your link, Sarkozy was making vague claims–without providing any evidence–and the Islamic leaders issued a _fatwah_ condemning the rioting to head off any more such silly claims.

So the Union of French Islamic Organizations has a fatwasa-for-silly-claims-department? Aside from pictures of a Monty Python skit you think they issued a religious edict based on false claims? Logically the fatwa was based on the premise that Muslims were involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 1:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/589 "2010-09-07T01:27:53Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> And this same person who thinks like this is going to differentiate between the context of when the Koran was written and society today as has been intimated in this thread? Well, which is it? Deep thinkers that can put things into historical context, or simpletons who don’t understand the importance of free speech?

Both. Neither. first of all, when people are offended, their understanding goes away and they don’t always think rationally. I believe in free speech, but when I see Fred Phelps protesting, my first reaction isn’t “Oh, isn’t it nice he’s exercising his rights.” I think, “I want to see him locked up, beaten up, and suffering.” It’s something visceral, not logical, and it’s not a failing of my intelligence. It’s a failing of my temper.

Second, go to your nearest church and ask the people there if they believe in slavery. I bet almost all of them will say no, even the ones who aren’t “deep thinkers”, who can put the bible in “historical context”. It’s not because they’re biblical scholars who can reconcile the bible’s approval of slavery. It’s because they’re raised in a society that says that slavery is wrong, and they’ve embraced the attitudes of their society. A Muslim born and raised in this country is probably going to have the same attitudes about their holy book. And as Muslims get more and more assimilated in American society, and as more and more imams are born and raised in the US with American culture, Islam in America is going to become more and more like Christianity or Judaism in America, just like Islam in the rest of the world is influenced by the other cultures where it exists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 1:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/590 "2010-09-07T01:51:20Z")

</div>

> [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
>
> Both. Neither. first of all, when people are offended, their understanding goes away and they don’t always think rationally. I believe in free speech, but when I see Fred Phelps protesting, my first reaction isn’t “Oh, isn’t it nice he’s exercising his rights.” I think, “I want to see him locked up, beaten up, and suffering.” It’s something visceral, not logical, and it’s not a failing of my intelligence. It’s a failing of my temper.

The difference is that most people don’t care what Fred Phelps does at his church. He’s a monkey with a book that might as well be written in Klingon for all the good it does him. Nobody is going to riot or sentence him to death. In fact, nobody has harmed him at a funeral where he goes out of his way to emotionally yank people around.

> [@Captain\_Amazing](#):
>
> A Muslim born and raised in this country is probably going to have the same attitudes about their holy book. And as Muslims get more and more assimilated in American society, and as more and more imams are born and raised in the US with American culture, Islam in America is going to become more and more like Christianity or Judaism in America, just like Islam in the rest of the world is influenced by the other cultures where it exists.

I agree with this to most of the extent but unlike the ultra waco’s of the Christian church there is more of a problem when the concept of 6 degrees of separation are applied. Like all religions, people will believe in what they choose to believe. In the case of the Ft Hood Shooter, he followed an American educated Imam overseas via the internet. In an age where ideas travel at the speed of sound, location is not the insulator it once was. I suppose that works both ways. When you look at how cell phones and the internet are used in Iran by the younger generation it is a powerful force. I suspect Kim Jong Il understands this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/591 "2010-09-07T01:58:24Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> So the Union of French Islamic Organizations has a fatwasa-for-silly-claims-department? Aside from pictures of a Monty Python skit you think they issued a religious edict based on false claims? Logically the fatwa was based on the premise that Muslims were involved.

No. The Union of French Islamic Organizations feels the need to defend against ridiculous charges from demogogue politicians that will result in more of the sort of harrassment that was already going on in France.  
Certainly some Muslims were involved. Beyond that, many of the kids who were rioting were children of Muslims, even though they were not, themselves, observant, which put pressure on the Muslim adults to distance themselves from the lies of Sarkozy and other politicians.  
I also notice that the news story dated to the second week of the riots. If the issue was so clearly “Muslim,” the riots should have stopped as soon as the _fatwah_ was issued. This did not happen, indicating that there was a clear separation between the Muslim religious leaders and the rioters, not that “Islam” was responsibe for the riots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/592 "2010-09-07T02:38:44Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> No. The Union of French Islamic Organizations feels the need to defend against ridiculous charges from demogogue politicians that will result in more of the sort of harrassment that was already going on in France.

Your opinion on what they think doesn’t match their actions. It is not logical that they would react to something they think is silly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 2:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/593 "2010-09-07T02:44:36Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> Why should I worry about what is in the Koran when the people in this thread can’t even read what I have written and parse it correctly.
> 
> [QUOTE=Revenant Threshold]  
> I’d tend to say that you could have the nicest possible holy book imaginable - “Free hugs and give lots of money to charity” and all that kind of thing - and people who wanted to cause violence and wanted a rationale would be perfectly able to conjure themselves up that rationale from that book.

I said the essentially the same thing part way through this thread. But it makes it easier when you know god wants you to kill others when you’re doing it, doesn’t it?  
[/QUOTE]  
I don’t think i’m saying what you’re saying. I’m saying people will read anything they want to read into something. That includes “god wants me to kill others”. You could remove all mentions of god from a book, have it be simply “No killing” written thirty thousand times in a row, and people would still hold it up and say it proves god’s will is to go out and murder, because, alas, that’s what we do. Having a helpful book with exactly what you want to read in it does not help, because _all_ books are that book, to the particular reader.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 2:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/594 "2010-09-07T02:50:32Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> > [@tomndebb](#):
> >
> > No. The Union of French Islamic Organizations feels the need to defend against ridiculous charges from demogogue politicians that will result in more of the sort of harrassment that was already going on in France.
> 
> Your opinion on what they think doesn’t match their actions. It is not logical that they would react to something they think is silly.

Sure it is. It’s not solely a matter of them thinking it silly, but of others thinking it silly. If someone spread around a rumour about me, which I know to be nonsense and untrue, my knowledge of that fact does not avail me if other people believe the rumour. I may well consider a rumour about me silly, but if others believe it, I am forced to take it seriously. Likewise, the Union in this case may well feel the charges are ridiculous, but if there are those who would take the charges seriously then it is perfectly reasonable for them to take a more serious view themselves.

As **tomndebb** suggests, if they have reason to believe the charges will result in harassment of Muslims, then the fact _they_ think they’re silly charges doesn’t mean they shouldn’t act.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Uzi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/91b2a8/32.png) [@Uzi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uzi)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/595 "2010-09-07T02:57:44Z")

</div>

> [@Revenant\_Threshold](#):
>
> Having a helpful book with exactly what you want to read in it does not help, because _all_ books are that book, to the particular reader.

So, words mean nothing except what someone wants them to mean? You have never read anything that had convinced you to do a certain action or change your thinking on a particular subject?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/596 "2010-09-07T03:10:27Z")

</div>

> [@Uzi](#):
>
> > [@Revenant\_Threshold](#):
> >
> > Having a helpful book with exactly what you want to read in it does not help, because _all_ books are that book, to the particular reader.
> 
> So, words mean nothing except what someone wants them to mean? You have never read anything that had convinced you to do a certain action or change your thinking on a particular subject?

You presume that I have never wanted to change my mind on an issue, or wanted to be open to new ideas. Perhaps I was looking for my mind to be changed on an issue, and grabbed onto something I could twist to my liking.

Yes, I would argue words mean nothing except what someone wants them to mean.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 3:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/597 "2010-09-07T03:59:14Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> > [@tomndebb](#):
> >
> > No. The Union of French Islamic Organizations feels the need to defend against ridiculous charges from demogogue politicians that will result in more of the sort of harrassment that was already going on in France.
> 
> Your opinion on what they think doesn’t match their actions. It is not logical that they would react to something they think is silly.

Really? No U.S. justice has ever taken a stand against teaching Creationism in school? That is silly, yet the courts have ruled on it. The notion that the King James Version of the bible is, in some way, “more true” than the Douay-Reims and Douay-Challoner bibles, is silly, yet the American Catholic Bishops went so far as to found an entirely separate school system in which they could be used so as to avoid the harrassment and persecution that people inflicted on Catholic students for declining to use the KJV.  
That a politician promotes a silly idea does not preclude that idea from being harmful or dangerous and the French Islamic Organizations responded to that danger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Magiver](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4491bb/32.png) [@Magiver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Magiver)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 6:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/598 "2010-09-07T06:05:51Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> > [@Magiver](#):
> >
> > Your opinion on what they think doesn’t match their actions. It is not logical that they would react to something they think is silly.
> 
> Really? No U.S. justice has ever taken a stand against teaching Creationism in school? That is silly, yet the courts have ruled on it. The notion that the King James Version of the bible is, in some way, “more true” than the Douay-Reims and Douay-Challoner bibles, is silly, yet the American Catholic Bishops went so far as to found an entirely separate school system in which they could be used so as to avoid the harrassment and persecution that people inflicted on Catholic students for declining to use the KJV.  
> That a politician promotes a silly idea does not preclude that idea from being harmful or dangerous and the French Islamic Organizations responded to that danger.

I have no idea what the hell you’re talking about. You deny the riots had any Islamic association yet I showed you that a federation of Islamic groups addressed the situation. Everything after that is pure psychic ability on your part regarding WHY they addressed the riots.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![qpw3141](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/6bbea6/32.png) [@qpw3141](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/qpw3141)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 7:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/599 "2010-09-07T07:33:57Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> > [@tomndebb](#):
> >
> > Really? No U.S. justice has ever taken a stand against teaching Creationism in school? That is silly, yet the courts have ruled on it. The notion that the King James Version of the bible is, in some way, “more true” than the Douay-Reims and Douay-Challoner bibles, is silly, yet the American Catholic Bishops went so far as to found an entirely separate school system in which they could be used so as to avoid the harrassment and persecution that people inflicted on Catholic students for declining to use the KJV.  
> > That a politician promotes a silly idea does not preclude that idea from being harmful or dangerous and the French Islamic Organizations responded to that danger.
> 
> I have no idea what the hell you’re talking about.

Perhaps, in that case, it would be better to stop embarrassing yourself by posting about something of which you admit to having no idea. 😉

> [@](#):
>
> You deny the riots had any Islamic association yet I showed you that a federation of Islamic groups addressed the situation.

Christian, Jewish and other groups address a lot of situations, good and bad.

The problem is that you want to hold Muslims and Islam to a different standard to that which you would hold other religions or groups.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2010, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891/600 "2010-09-07T14:06:42Z")

</div>

> [@Magiver](#):
>
> > [@tomndebb](#):
> >
> > Really? No U.S. justice has ever taken a stand against teaching Creationism in school? That is silly, yet the courts have ruled on it. The notion that the King James Version of the bible is, in some way, “more true” than the Douay-Reims and Douay-Challoner bibles, is silly, yet the American Catholic Bishops went so far as to found an entirely separate school system in which they could be used so as to avoid the harrassment and persecution that people inflicted on Catholic students for declining to use the KJV.  
> > That a politician promotes a silly idea does not preclude that idea from being harmful or dangerous and the French Islamic Organizations responded to that danger.
> 
> I have no idea what the hell you’re talking about. You deny the riots had any Islamic association yet I showed you that a federation of Islamic groups addressed the situation. Everything after that is pure psychic ability on your part regarding WHY they addressed the riots.

If I say “I was not involved with the French riots” does that mean that they had some Revenant association?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891.md?page=29)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/burning-books-in-the-us-burn-quran-day/550891.md?page=31)
