# Butt-Hurt Trump Takes to Twitter Again (Part 1)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 19, 2016, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428 "2016-11-19T15:52:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 258

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Folacin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/folacin/32/3195_2.png) [@Folacin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Folacin)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2018, 5:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5141 "2018-09-28T17:52:15Z")

</div>

> [@Kimstu](#):
>
> Just nitpicking this to point out that according to normal procedure, a new Supreme Court justice (presumably Merrick Garland) would have been chosen and seated **before** the last election, but deliberate Republican obstructionism prevented it.
> 
> No, that doesn’t mean that Democrats are “entitled” to (or have a snowball’s chance of getting) a non-conservative justice selected during **this** administration. But it does give some perspective on where the current shitshow came from in the first place.

Garland being seated would not have affected Kennedy resigning and opening up this seat, unless you think Trump would have put Gorsuch up for this seat instead of Kavanaugh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2018, 6:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5142 "2018-09-28T18:03:18Z")

</div>

> [@Folacin](#):
>
> Garland being seated would not have affected Kennedy resigning and opening up this seat, unless you think Trump would have put Gorsuch up for this seat instead of Kavanaugh.

Yes, that’s what I think: sorry for not being more clear about it. I think Gorsuch would have ended up replacing Kennedy anyway, but at least we’d have had Garland replacing Scalia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Tooth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c67d28/32.png) [@The\_Tooth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Tooth)\
**Post date:** [September 28, 2018, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5143 "2018-09-28T18:50:55Z")

</div>

> [@Great\_Antibob](#):
>
> McConnell reportedly pushed for a different choice, presumably because of the personal finances (and discussion of those have dropped by the wayside in light of recent events). I imagine he would have pushed harder if he knew Kavanaugh had a damned cemetery in his closet.
> 
> They don’t, but sufficient pushback might produce somebody who isn’t so transparently in Trump’s back pocket. It’s one thing to accept that the nominee will be a conservative. It’s another to accept somebody without a moral compass at all.

It’s not another thing, it’s the same thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 1:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5144 "2018-09-29T01:37:48Z")

</div>

and this is a good thing?

> [@DJT](#):
>
> Just started, tonight, our 7th FBI investigation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He will someday be recognized as a truly great Justice of The United States Supreme Court!

> <https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1045832351211835392>

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BlankSlate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blankslate/32/80_2.png) [@BlankSlate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BlankSlate)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 1:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5145 "2018-09-29T01:46:39Z")

</div>

_A Confederacy of Rapists_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 1:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5146 "2018-09-29T01:53:16Z")

</div>

> [@simster](#):
>
> and this is a good thing?
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > Originally Posted by DJT  
> > Just started, tonight, our 7th FBI investigation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. He will someday be recognized as a truly great Justice of The United States Supreme Court!
> 
> [https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1045832351211835392](https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1045832351211835392)

What?? 😕 Seventh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5147 "2018-09-29T01:55:55Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> What?? 😕 Seventh?

If you count the other background checks, over the years - then it wouldn’t surprise me.

If he means “7th tied to possible criminal behaviour” -or 7th since this specific process started, well, that’s another.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 2:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5148 "2018-09-29T02:24:42Z")

</div>

No, he’s just making up numbers. Like when someone says: I’ve told you a thousand times.  
Is this news to anyone?? I’m shocked. OK, I hope you’re sitting down: The President is a dumb fuck.  
Try not to let it affect your sleep. 2 more years to go.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5149 "2018-09-29T03:36:57Z")

</div>

> [@bobot](#):
>
> No, he’s just making up numbers. Like when someone says: I’ve told you a thousand times.  
> Is this news to anyone?? I’m shocked. OK, I hope you’re sitting down: The President is a dumb fuck.  
> Try not to let it affect your sleep. 2 more years to go.

Now you tell me. :rolleyes:

It’s been affecting my sleep since the day after the election. And my waking hours, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2018, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5150 "2018-09-29T23:57:37Z")

</div>

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> What?? 😕 Seventh?

> [@simster](#):
>
> If you count the other background checks, over the years - then it wouldn’t surprise me.
> 
> If he means “7th tied to possible criminal behaviour” -or 7th since this specific process started, well, that’s another.

> [@bobot](#):
>
> No, he’s just making up numbers. Like when someone says: I’ve told you a thousand times.  
> Is this news to anyone?? I’m shocked. OK, I hope you’re sitting down: The President is a dumb fuck.  
> Try not to let it affect your sleep. 2 more years to go.

It’s a major talking point for the right that ‘Kavanaugh has undergone SIX FBI investigations ALREADY!!!1!!!’

Anyone who hasn’t cut the cord will be seeing pro-Kavanaugh commercials playing in heavy rotation, and this is a line that’s prominently featured.

Of course the implication is that any charges against Kavanaugh MUST be bullshit because FBI investigations uncover every single thing the subject has ever said or done throughout their entire lives. Want to know what Kavanaugh was doing at 3:18pm exactly fourteen years ago? Ask the FBI…they can tell you that information for every single minute of Kavanaugh’s life!

Not true, of course. But that’s what Trump fans are being told, and that’s what they duly believe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 12:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5151 "2018-09-30T00:00:30Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> It’s a major talking point for the right that ‘Kavanaugh has undergone SIX FBI investigations ALREADY!!!1!!!’
> 
> Anyone who hasn’t cut the cord will be seeing pro-Kavanaugh commercials playing in heavy rotation, and this is a line that’s prominently featured.
> 
> Of course the implication is that any charges against Kavanaugh MUST be bullshit because FBI investigations uncover every single thing the subject has ever said or done throughout their entire lives. Want to know what Kavanaugh was doing at 3:18pm exactly fourteen years ago? Ask the FBI…they can tell you that information for every single minute of Kavanaugh’s life!
> 
> Not true, of course. But that’s what Trump fans are being told, and that’s what they duly believe.

If I wanted that detailed of descriptions of the daily lives of conservative politicians, I wouldn’t ask the FBI.

I’d ask Putin.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5152 "2018-09-30T00:07:22Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> If I wanted that detailed of descriptions of the daily lives of conservative politicians, I wouldn’t ask the FBI.
> 
> I’d ask Putin.

😃 Smart!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 2:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5153 "2018-09-30T02:36:19Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> It’s a major talking point for the right that ‘Kavanaugh has undergone SIX FBI investigations ALREADY!!!1!!!’
> 
> Anyone who hasn’t cut the cord will be seeing pro-Kavanaugh commercials playing in heavy rotation, and this is a line that’s prominently featured.
> 
> Of course the implication is that any charges against Kavanaugh MUST be bullshit because FBI investigations uncover every single thing the subject has ever said or done throughout their entire lives. Want to know what Kavanaugh was doing at 3:18pm exactly fourteen years ago? Ask the FBI…they can tell you that information for every single minute of Kavanaugh’s life!
> 
> Not true, of course. But that’s what Trump fans are being told, and that’s what they duly believe.

Right - so -

how many investigations have the clinton’s been in - and zero charges or issues?

and its the SAME people doing both?

you can’[t have it both ways …

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ThelmaLou](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thelmalou/32/390_2.png) [@ThelmaLou](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ThelmaLou)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 3:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5154 "2018-09-30T03:03:47Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> If I wanted that detailed of descriptions of the daily lives of conservative politicians, I wouldn’t ask the FBI.
> 
> I’d ask Putin.

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> 😃 Smart!

With video!! 🙂

> [@simster](#):
>
> Right - so -
> 
> how many investigations have the clinton’s been in - and zero charges or issues?
> 
> and its the SAME people doing both?
> 
> you can’[t have it both ways …

Wrong. Republicans can have it both ways. Or more if they want.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2018, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5155 "2018-09-30T22:48:40Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> It’s a major talking point for the right that ‘Kavanaugh has undergone SIX FBI investigations ALREADY!!!1!!!’  
> Anyone who hasn’t cut the cord will be seeing pro-Kavanaugh commercials playing in heavy rotation, and this is a line that’s prominently featured.
> 
> Of course the implication is that any charges against Kavanaugh MUST be bullshit because FBI investigations uncover every single thing the subject has ever said or done throughout their entire lives. Want to know what Kavanaugh was doing at 3:18pm exactly fourteen years ago? Ask the FBI…they can tell you that information for every single minute of Kavanaugh’s life!  
> Not true, of course. But that’s what Trump fans are being told, and that’s what they duly believe.

> [@simster](#):
>
> Right - so -  
> how many investigations have the clinton’s been in - and zero charges or issues?  
> and its the SAME people doing both?  
> you can’[t have it both ways …

> [@ThelmaLou](#):
>
> … Wrong. Republicans can have it both ways. Or more if they want.

Very true.

Add to that the fact that simster is trying to equate ‘FBI background checks for judgeships’ with ‘Congress and the FBI investigating Hillary vainly hoping to find criminal wrongdoing.’ Oh, and ‘Congressional and/or FBI investigation of Bill and Hillary during Bill’s presidency’—which, again, isn’t the same thing as a background check for a judgeship.

So that dog won’t hunt.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nava](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/da6949/32.png) [@Nava](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nava)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2018, 11:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5156 "2018-10-01T11:12:47Z")

</div>

> [@Smapti](#):
>
> Sexual predators have to stick together, you know.

Couldn’t they just use Loctite?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2018, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5157 "2018-10-01T13:38:53Z")

</div>

> [@Sherrerd](#):
>
> Very true.
> 
> Add to that the fact that simster is trying to equate ‘FBI background checks for judgeships’ with ‘Congress and the FBI investigating Hillary vainly hoping to find criminal wrongdoing.’ Oh, and ‘Congressional and/or FBI investigation of Bill and Hillary during Bill’s presidency’—which, again, isn’t the same thing as a background check for a judgeship.
> 
> So that dog won’t hunt.

It doesn’t matter anymore. Not one bit. They still get anything they want. And the Trumpies love it,

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ambrosio\_Spinola](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9de0a6/32.png) [@Ambrosio\_Spinola](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ambrosio_Spinola)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 1:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5158 "2018-10-05T13:46:31Z")

</div>

It’s been relatively quiet lately, maybe Trump’s decided to calm it down ahead of the midterm elec . . .

> [@Some Asshole](#):
>
> The very rude elevator screamers are paid professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don’t fall for it! Also, look at all of the professionally made identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from love! #Troublemakers

Oh.

Serious question, is this the first time that Trump has been blaming George Soros specifically for anything? I know he’s a common boogeyman for various figures on the right but I can’t recall hearing it from the top before. Also, this sort of stuff used to be passed around on mimeographed Birch Society handouts which _real_ officeholders would politely ignore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gus\_Gusterson](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/85f322/32.png) [@Gus\_Gusterson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gus_Gusterson)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 1:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5159 "2018-10-05T13:55:03Z")

</div>

By his logic, shouldn’t his followers make their own MAGA hats “in the basement from love” instead of buying the professionally made, identical ones he sells?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 1:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428/5160 "2018-10-05T13:59:07Z")

</div>

> [@Gus\_Gusterson](#):
>
> By his logic, shouldn’t his followers make their own MAGA hats “in the basement from love” instead of buying the professionally made, identical ones he sells?

Where are those MAGA hats made? Does anyone have one handy to peek at the tag?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428.md?page=257)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/butt-hurt-trump-takes-to-twitter-again-part-1/772428.md?page=259)
