Obama has made no recommendations yet, and any recommendations are a far cry from becoming law, Rather than wait for a law to take effect, or even signed into law, or even passed in Congress, or even considered by Congress, or even recommended by Obama, yes I’d say that stocking up on weapons that they don’t even need in the first place IS paranoia.
So they’re supposed to wait for the law to take effect, and then act, which would be… to not get the weapons that were banned, because hey, the ban went into effect?
You all sound dumb when you clamor for banning these weapons, celebrate when politicians say they’re taking up this cause, and then call people paranoid for thinking they might actually come to fruition and acting on it.
Would it be too much to ask to wait for the law to even begin making its way through Congress? Do you honestly think Boehner is going to allow this to pass in a single day?
“Grab”? Seconds count! Why not just rig it up permanently, with the barrel aiming through the peephole?
What’s the benefit of waiting? What’s the cost of acting? Oh no, worst case scenario, they may end up with something they wanted anyway, and it doesn’t get banned. I fail to see how taking action here is faulty.
Such use of gun verbiage… why, it’s so very manly! I’m feeling both extra insecure and so very turned on right now!
Like all politicians, they’re responding to the demands of their constituencies to take action on an issue that is important to them. It’s not a giant conspiracy as some claim. The loud voices on the right are demanding that their elected politicians take action to block those efforts, and are at present drowning out the voices of reason. Politicians who take unilateral action without the support of their voting base take a serious risk of being jobless soon after.
“Longer barrels and tighter tolerances” is gun lingo? I actually avoided using actual gun terminology so that it wouldn’t distract from the joke, because I know you pedantic assholes would focus on that instead. Bizarrely, I chose to go with the very basic layman version instead, and yet you are still a pedantic asshole. Huh.
Well, that makes sense, but…if you already have an AR-15, or two, why get more? So that you can cannibalize them for parts?
Oh, there was supposed to be a joke in there?
What does conspiracy have to do with this? Bans on certain types of weapons are being seriously considered, so people are rushing their timeline for buying these weapons to be ahead of any potential ban, and also any shortages caused by this discussion. Your whole post was a big non-sequitor. What does the nature of representative democracy and conspiracy theories have anything to do with buying a potentially banned item before it’s banned?
If you’re asking seriously, not everyone already owns one. I don’t. If I was in the market for a gun now, I’d consider buying one now.
But if a ban does go through like the '94 AWB, where banned weapons are grandfathered, then their constricted supply raises the value of pre-ban weapons. If they’re confident something will go through, then it actually becomes a pretty good investment.
There are also different configurations of the rifles, different things you can do with them, etc.
What is the point that you’re trying to make here? What is it that you think they’re trying to do? Work on quad-wielding them so they can take out as many cute kids as they can at once?
Offhand, I’d say a seller’s market is the worst time to buy. Not that I care if this particular group is relieved of its money, but if it was me I’d wait to see how it shakes out before joining a buying frenzy.
So your concern in this thread, then, is that the people rushing to buy AR-15s right now may not be in an ideal market?
Come on, shoot higher. Come up with some sort of analogy relating to owning a whole lot of slaves rather than just a few.
Doesn’t owning four of them make you four times as manly? Aren’t you being four times as responsible in carrying out the self-defensive responsibilities that my femininity forces me to abdicate? I know that I have to admit to being four times as self-loathing and thus four times as dedicated to undoing your rugged individualism.
To quote Fletch, “God, I admire you.”
No, owning a whole bunch just reflects that you’re a hobbyist. It has nothing to do with your overall attitude towards the role of guns in society and self defense.
It amuses me how you all get into these massive, consistent circle jerks, all making these wild claims about the paranoia and motivaton of gun rights advocates. That we’re all desperately afraid of the world, barely functional, that we all have tiny penises and that we literally clutch at our guns constantly. And yet if someone characterizes the attitude another way - in quite a bit more restrained and realistic tone, suddenly it’s worth over the top mocking as if it were totally out of place.
Your bias on the issue is blinding and pretty absurd. This board starts to resemble freeper style right wing echo chambers on this issue, where you all try so hard to outdo each other at being ridiculous while patting each other on the back the whole time.
I think on this issue, even on this board, the gun people are more vocal than those of us that don’t like guns.
Not at all. After the school shooting, several threads immediately sprung up that were absolutely gleeful that they’d get the chance to rub it into gun advocates faces. SEE, I TOLD YOU SO, THIS IS YOUR FAULT.
The status quo has been reasonable to gun owners for a while now, so there’s not really reason to discuss it. The nature of discussion is such that someone proposes that new gun control legislaton be brought about, and then the gun rights advocates have to defend against it. This board, without a doubt, features far more of an anti-gun circle jerk than anything pro-gun.
Do I really need to point out the absurdity of the guy WHO SAID THAT OWNING A FUCKING FIREARM IS MORALLY EQUIVELANT TO ENSLAVING OTHER HUMAN BEINGS now claiming to be on the restrained, quiet side of the argument? For fucks sake, you’re an idiot.
I can’t speak for others, but I’m not clamoring for banning these weapons. I have participated in the 10,000 current gun control threads to argue the merits of gun control in general, and that’s it.
One problem is that people have asked gun owners how they’d approach the issue, and most of them* start going NO GUN CONTROL EVER OF ANY KIND OMG HITLER.
*those who aren’t tend to attract “yeah, right, like you own a gun” comments.
I’m more extreme than most, I will concede. But like the abolitionists of the 1850s, I’ll be vindicated by history. You may think I’m an idiot, but in my opinion going apeshit over the the potential regulations of weapons of mass murder is quite a bit dumber than I’ll ever hope to be.