# cable modem vs. T1

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cable-modem-vs-t1/165335>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 31, 2003, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cable-modem-vs-t1/165335 "2003-03-31T01:10:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![polymur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7993a0/32.png) [@polymur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/polymur)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2003, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cable-modem-vs-t1/165335/1 "2003-03-31T01:10:39Z")

</div>

(disclaimer: I tried to search for any previous thread on this, but T1 is not recognized by search engine)

My company’s t1 costs about $800 and gets about 1.5m/second up and down stream. My cable modem at home gets about 3.5mbps/second down and 98kbps/second up for $50. My understanding is that att/comcast keeps upstream limited so you can’t run a server, etc.

My questions are:

1. Why is there such a disparity between residential and corporate prices?
2. Is there something about upstream that is more costly?
3. Can I sign my company up for cable modem for $50 - $100 and get some sort of cheap redundancy (ISDN, 4 56K combined lines, etc) for an expected lower uptime comittment?

BTW, we don’t run servers out of our office … that is outsourced.

What’s the real deal, why am I paying 16 times more at the office for slower speed?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![polymur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7993a0/32.png) [@polymur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/polymur)\
**Post date:** [March 31, 2003, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cable-modem-vs-t1/165335/2 "2003-03-31T01:11:56Z")

</div>

Mod, please delete this duplicate … it got posted accidentally with back button
