California's Proposition 90: Trojan horse of the property-rights movement

Great Debates
21

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
But Prop 90 isn’t mainly about eminent domain. It’s about government regulations and actions that depress property values. Any kind of regulations or actions.
[/quote]

“Mainly”? Hmm. The proposition makes Eminent Domain seizures for private development a no-no. Then it has to discuss what “just compensation” is for issues dealing with property seized for public use, and for property effected by new changes in statutes. (Zoning/dezoning, for example.)

No. It’s the states job to assess a properties tax value, and send the owner a statement (and tax bill) to that affect. It is not up to the property owner to be aware of all public improvements in the general area, and guesstimate what that difference means in taxes, and cut a check. The burden is on the Gov for that.

22

[QUOTE=ouryL]
So if they pass a law to outlaw this, the developer can sue for damages? :confused:
[/QUOTE]

This is mentioned in the text on “dezoning”:

http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/vig_06/general_06/pdf/proposition_90/entire_prop90.pdf

If a developer got a permit to build 500 homes in an area, then later the local gov says “Nevermind. Make that 250.” Than probably, yes. It seems that the local gov better put some thought into zoning when they issue permits…

But if a developer got a permit to build 250 homes, he can’t sue claiming that he feels he should have been allowed to build 500.

23

[QUOTE=BrainGlutton]
But that’s not what Prop 90 is about, it’s just the clause they’re using to sell it. See the OP and post #3.
[/QUOTE]

The official voting guide is here:

http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/vig_06/general_06/pdf/proposition_90/entire_prop90.pdf

Limits actions as described by me are found on page 92, under the section “What Property Takings Would Be Prohibited?”.