Think, people indeed. WHY are any of you attempting to converse or reason with someone spewing out complete INSANITY like this? I mean, seriously, I am posting from my phone and I had to delete about 30min worth of brain-diahrrea before I could post this. This person is ill and needs professional help.
Easily: the center of the earth; the center of Jupiter; the center of the Sun; the event-horizon of a black hole; a teenager’s sweat-socks…
Now entering the… sixth(?) day of this fiasco, we learn that the OP is surprised that anyone would be willing to accept the notion that physical laws still work in space. Because it is cold there and you can’t play Twister. Or something.
Has anyone ever played Twister in the International Space Station? DANG! They ought to!
Actually, the Hokey Pokey might be better for this…
You put your right brain IN
You take your left brain OUT
You say a bunch of crazy shit
And cry and moan and pout
You cross an infinity
And turn yourself around
That’s what it’s all about!
My sides, they hurt!
Best post in the entire thread! trabajábamos for the win!
No it doesn’t.
Pressure is reduced - but that doesn’t happen abruptly at some point - the atmosphere thins out until it’s more or less a vacuum.
There’s no such thing as ‘anti-pressure’. Fail.
No it doesn’t.
One of the major problems in designing spacecraft and space suits is preventing overheating. Vacuum is quite a good insulator, and with little or no atmosphere to attenuate the sun’s rays, things can get very hot.
Space isn’t cold. Fail.
So. Fucking. What?
This also happens to people put in prison, or having an MRI scan, or visiting the bathroom. So. Fucking. What?
Unless you change course.
No. Because it’s possible to launch spacecraft in any direction - toward the sun, Jupiter, whatever - which are different directions. Fail.
It may surprise you to learn that knowing and controlling the three-dimensional location of objects in space is kinda critical to getting them to their intended destination. You are, and have been, talking utter cock for the entirety of this thread.
Seriously, your argument is this?
I don’t think you need to rewrite the laws of physics to know that things changes and conditions are different in one place than another. You can walk around on land but if you stay underwater too long you’ll drown. Oh noes, the laws of physics invert underwater! You need oxygen to breath but plants need carbon dioxide. Oh noes, the laws of physics invert in plants! Before you’re born you can fit inside another human being* but afterwards you can’t any more. Oh noes, the laws of physics invert in your mother’s vaginal canal!
Honestly, dude, you’re confusing subjective perception with objective reality across the board using ludicrous criteria. There ain’t no math that can support your point in any meaningful way.
*shut up, you smutty people
I think you type too much.
Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human. At best he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear shoes, bathe, and not make messes in the house. ~Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love
Seems like there are still a lot of followers of that particular proclamation. Then again, he was agreeing with Pythagoras, so that must count for something. I’m with the OP in that it doesn’t matter how fancy your maths is, if you cannot verbalise what it means, it may as well be numerology.
I’ve conferred with professor Markov, and he was good enough to provide me with a succinct summary of Anthem (0)'s thesis.
[spoiler]Sun to us inexplicated in the invisible path.
I WANT you persphere,
- on the maximum value of the Sun it’s a 4-D object, they can only one of tumescence.
The composition in fuckery, squabbles, or you have the astery of Earth and the “other dimensionality”, then the principle rocky against diffuse rocky against difference at an intersection know as GRAVITY. We area of itself from a guide. Odds and it movement in unless blend of the same exact 1:2:4 ratio of the “other attempting translated into the exposed circle jerks bett”.
Kuiper Belt, about his neck and Intergalactic Space is that that should be helps tremendously limited timeline’s destroyed planets are they are the process.
Note: this point of outer Space (the Ganymede – an equator. This is the universe) is ¾ the concepts forms them is a ball other respond what distance between Io, Europa is a hall other, the same.
I’m not a single planets and predictable, discourse in the Sun in the fabric of reality. We don’t understand the asteroid belt.
OUT in order for any relearn the planets in the OUTside. Odds and the surface. This is the volumes of translated as the asteroid belt represented coalescence they all bodies must ORBIT in existence. Their own ring smart that infinity…just beyond the asteroid belt” orbiting an infinitely the surface to refer to be satisfied in detail as required, but if you possibly consistence. Outer Space is all of you’re only skills are well enough about? Or has poor represents and the obvious view.
Earth is collapsing itself from the principle layout of objects into visible light, forward back to touch one interested in both relativity, and an equation between IN and civility that we call dimensional galaxy,
- on the OUT is the direction: This explains why this is creating the orbiting religious or to a “single planets” are they are Intergalactic Space) representative decoded into a disputed since it’s probably is happens to pretend being religious meditations INward” 4-1 aspectacles?
We live inside of the Sun.
We live inside of the Sun.[/spoiler]
Sting, that guy who saves rain forests and other cool stuff, actually believed the sun was invisible and did a mini documentary set to music explaining his theory.
<hat tip />
I BEG of you that you do not close this thread. Too many people have put time and effort into this, and it’s getting close to comedy genius.
To Anthem:
Please, oh please tell us your degrees or certifications. Also, re-summarize your main thesis in a logical order.
My degrees/certifications on the subject: I’m an sixteen year old high school graduate (as well as an emancipated, legal adult) with a great mind and logical way of thinking. I took multiple classes involving astrophysics and hypothetical creationism. I deeply enjoy learning, and am completely open to any theory you propose that is true and makes sense. I scored a 32/32 on my ACT, if that counts for anything. I don’t claim to be a math genius, but I’m no idiot. I’m younger than most here, but I’m just as capable of logic and intelligence.
So, the moral of that story is: I’m sixteen and have a high school diploma. I got it last semester, so when I should’ve been a sophomore. I’m pretty damn smart. No genius, but certainly not stupid.
Your turn, please. Use that format and tell us what you have that makes you a reliable source of information. You could even throw in a bullet formatted list! Stop being hostile, it’s unnecessary. You’ve completely alienated everyone from even thinking about agreeing with you. Perhaps, if you would, apologize. Apologize for your arrogance and some people may accept your apology and MAYBE think about what you have to say.
If you won’t do as I have asked, you’re not going to get anywhere on this discussion.
Then go live in a mud hut in the woods because essentially everything you enjoy in the modern world is a result of the “fancy maths” you thumb your nose at. Do you think the computer you used to write your post could possibly exist if there wasn’t something to our current understanding of reality as informed by math and science?
wait. wait.
there’s someone here who is actually backing up Anthem’s nonsense?
…that can’t be right.
Perhaps I was whooshed. I hope I was whooshed.
And here all this while I thought you were just pretending to be dense. Do you seriously not know the difference between the living environment in which you’ve existed for every moment of your life and OUTER SPACE. You’re so braindead you’re defining your the only environment you’ve ever known strictly in terms of an environment which you are not only incapable of comprehending, but which you also have never and will never be able to go to. Outer space is incompatible with life and you are living. At least your body is…I’m not so sure about your brain at this point if this is a difficult question for you to understand.
This is a simple question. Yes it requires you actually THINK for once, instead of posting links which are arguing against the strawman arguments you’ve convinced yourself that I’m making.
Can you think of an environment which is LESS like earth-space (the environment in which YOU live…ANY part of it, underwater, on the ground, in the air, ANYWHERE on the goddamn planet) than outer space? Is it even possible to conceive of such a thing? It is literally the opposite of EVERYTHING our existence is based on. But somehow the math works in both environments, so we think nothing of it.
In your wildest imagination, could you think of an environment which more dissimilar to YOUR WORLD than outer space?
Quit running from the question.