# Can a biopic of a racist person not be racist?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [December 20, 2020, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475 "2020-12-20T19:38:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/1 "2020-12-20T19:38:41Z")

</div>

This could end up in GD, so I’ll let the mods decide on that.

Suppose someone were to make a biographical movie about Robert E. Lee, Hitler, Stonewall Jackson, or the like - does the movie have to include depictions of his racist behavior (in a condemning way) in order to be nonracist, or is it okay to focus solely on his non-race-related attributes (for instance, a movie that focuses mostly on examining Lee or Stonewall’s prowess as a military commander in the field, or how Hitler grew up and didn’t make it into art school, or how Hitler and his generals debated over how best to wage the war in Russia?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/2 "2020-12-20T20:00:13Z")

</div>

If you’re focusing on Lee’s or Hitler’s non-racist traits, what’s left? The only reason anyone ever talks about either man is their racist beliefs and actions. If you just want to make a movie about some schmo who never got into art school, well, heck, there are millions of those folks-- Why not focus on one of the others?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/3 "2020-12-20T20:12:12Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> (for instance, a movie that focuses mostly on examining Lee or Stonewall’s prowess as a military commander in the field, or how Hitler grew up and didn’t make it into art school, or how Hitler and his generals debated over how best to wage the war in Russia?)

FYI, there was a [movie](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_(2002_film)) that portrays Hitler as a struggling artist. I think I saw it but don’t remember much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banksiaman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banksiaman/32/3334_2.png) [@Banksiaman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banksiaman)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/4 "2020-12-20T20:39:20Z")

</div>

The other side of the argument is to ask whether you are neatly overlooking abhorrent aspects of your subject. At best, naive misrepresentation or, at worst, white-washing.

Hitler was a vegetarian when that was novel, and I gather he passed laws relating to animal welfare. A documentary focussing on that would be legitimate, but its a worthy subject because its Hitler [with all his Hitler background and significance as a historical player], rather than Mabel Bloggs, an equally committed vegan.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/5 "2020-12-20T20:40:09Z")

</div>

I believe there’s at least one biopic of Henry Ford which focuses on his contributions to the automotive industry and glosses over his racism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-DUB](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/e-dub/32/403_2.png) [@E-DUB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-DUB)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 8:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/6 "2020-12-20T20:51:59Z")

</div>

I suppose one could do a biopic of H.P. Lovecraft and focus only on his work and not mention his flaming racism, but that would be dishonest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/7 "2020-12-20T20:55:57Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> does the movie have to include depictions of his racist behavior (in a condemning way) in order to be nonracist

Yes.

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> is it okay to focus solely on his non-race-related attributes

No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/8 "2020-12-20T21:00:07Z")

</div>

Why are portrayals of Nazis given the benefit of the doubt, and understood not to be in support of Naziism? Nothing else is. If a film portrays misogyny, it’s assumed to be misogynist. The same appears to be the case, if this thread is any indication, of portrayals of racists.

How do you make art condemning racism with portraying racists? Or condemn misogyny without showing misogynists?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/9 "2020-12-20T21:04:14Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Why are portrayals of Nazis given the benefit of the doubt, and understood not to be in support of Naziism? Nothing else is. If a film portrays misogyny, it’s assumed to be misogynist. The same appears to be the case, if this thread is any indication, of portrayals of racists?

It’s the same for both: it’s only racist/misogynist if the film portrays them in a non-condemning way. It’s perfectly fine to have a documentary show that a racist guy was racist, or to have a movie where the hero beats the racist asshole.

Also, a belated welcome back.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/10 "2020-12-20T21:05:19Z")

</div>

Isn’t this exactly why memorials to Confederate generals are problematic?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/11 "2020-12-20T21:15:19Z")

</div>

Relevant to the OP, though, _Max_ doesn’t ignore Hitler’s anti-Semitism or fascist politics. To the contrary, they’re both essential elements to the film.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/12 "2020-12-20T21:17:12Z")

</div>

But these subjects are not given the same benefits of the doubt. There are many films, for example, that portray a woman overcoming misogyny, but which are condemned by many as misogynist. There’s a whole genre of these films, “rape-revenge” movies, to which Uma Thurman and Quentin Tarantino paid explicit homage with “Kill Bill.” Yet the movies that inspired it are frequently called misogynist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/13 "2020-12-20T21:31:50Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> There are many films,

If there are many, do you think that you could provide an example?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/14 "2020-12-20T21:37:01Z")

</div>

Suppose we focus solely on, say, Operation Barbarossa. And the film is focusing solely on Hitler and his generals arguing and debating - should we push for Moscow? Is Stalingrad really worth it? Criss-crossing these two armies is going to cause a massive jam and confusion. Let’s call off the attack at Kursk; it’s obvious the Soviets have dug in huge rings of concentric defense and an attack would be suicide. Etc. etc.

There would be no need or reason to bring in the Holocaust, or anti-Semitism, in what would be a movie focusing solely on a particular war front and particular situation. But does that omission make the movie sympathetic to an anti-Semitic guy?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/15 "2020-12-20T21:42:26Z")

</div>

The heroic-women films of Paul Verhoeven and Lars Von Trier. The “women’s pictures” of Douglas Sirk and Max Ophuls.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/16 "2020-12-20T21:57:11Z")

</div>

Sure, that’s reasonable, because what made Henry Ford great was his contribution to the auto industry. It wouldn’t be a complete picture of his life, but then, no movie is ever a completely complete picture of anyone’s life, because it’d need to be 70 years long to do do that. It’s a bad thing that Ford was so antisemitic, but in an alternate universe where he wasn’t, he would still be Ford the automobile industrialist.

In an alternate universe where Hitler wasn’t an anti-semite, though, he’s Hitler the… what? His anti-semitism is the core of his entire public identity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 10:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/17 "2020-12-20T22:25:20Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Douglas Sirk

Okay, I see that they made films, some of which were about women.

I’m not seeing

> [@lissener](#):
>
> condemned by many as misogynist

Quite yet.

Is this that there were some tweets, someone’s blog, or what? Is it “many” in a relative term, like 3 gunshots to the chest is many, or in absolute terms, as in a significant number?

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Yet the movies that inspired it are frequently called misogynist.

Frequently, sure, if you say so. But a not so brief google skim doesn’t show me any of this. Did you actually have cites of this, or is it just something that you’ve heard, and feel that since you’ve heard it, it is frequent?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lissener](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lissener/32/6139_2.png) [@lissener](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lissener)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/18 "2020-12-20T22:40:54Z")

</div>

Have you seen any of thes movies?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 10:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/19 "2020-12-20T22:41:25Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> There’s a whole genre of these films, “rape-revenge” movies, to which Uma Thurman and Quentin Tarantino paid explicit homage with “Kill Bill.”

Kill Bill isn’t about rape revenge so I’m a bit confused by this statement. And the one bit that is about rape (Buck) is almost played for comic relief. But sure, there’s a certain point at which rape as a subject matter becomes exploitative and probably some people have complained about that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2020, 10:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475/20 "2020-12-20T22:45:01Z")

</div>

> [@lissener](#):
>
> Why are portrayals of Nazis given the benefit of the doubt, and understood not to be in support of Naziism?

I’m hard pressed to think of any portrayal of a Nazi that wasn’t a bad guy. My knowledge of cinema isn’t encyclopedic so I concede that I might have missed something. But for almost my entire life, as soon as you saw a Nazi in a movie you knew they were the bad guy. Even if they weren’t engaging in genocide or war crimes they were trying to stop Doctor Jones or something.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-a-biopic-of-a-racist-person-not-be-racist/928475.md?page=2)
