# Can America trust atheists?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [March 26, 2006, 1:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906 "2006-03-26T01:07:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/261 "2006-03-28T23:15:18Z")

</div>

> [@SentientMeat](#):
>
> And finally:  
> Such as?

(The question being - what does a strong atheist believe that a weak one does not)  
That no gods exist, of course. That’s the definition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/262 "2006-03-28T23:16:05Z")

</div>

> [@InvisibleWombat](#):
>
> It appears to me after slogging through this thread that the theists _believe on faith_ that a god exists, where atheists _believe on faith_ that no god exists. .

:rolleyes:

That’s all you got out of slogging through 6 pages? Unbelievable.

About this “arrogant” perception. I suppose most theists are surprised that atheists have actually sat down and thought about religion. Why that should be I can’t understand, if someone never bothered to think about religion and God they’d likely just follow the religion of their family.

So just about every argument that a theist can bring up will be shot down easily by most atheists, because we’ve heard it all before. If the argument was convincing to us we would have been convinced long ago, the first time we heard it. Jack Chick atheists don’t exist: “Jesus died for our sins? Really? I’ve never heard that before! He loved us that much? Where can I learn more about this Jesus? Is there perhaps a book I could read about him? What must I do to be saved?”

Um, yeah, I’ve heard about Jesus before, thanks for the tip. I’ve heard Pascal’s Wager before. I’ve seen the ontological proof of God before. I’ve heard of the Uncaused First Cause before. I’ve heard the claims that Darwin and Einstein believed in God before. I’ve heard the “atheists claim to be omniscient” quip before. Heard it all before, seen it all before, rejected it all long ago. Will I listen one more time? Sure, why not. You’re not going to change my mind though. Oh, I’m close minded, because I’m sure I won’t change my mind? That’s great.

There’s something about atheists being confident we’re right that just rubs theists the wrong way, like they just can’t believe we think we’re right, all they need is to find the right way to explain God and we’ll fall in line. It’s arrogant! Why can’t we admit we might be wrong? Well, how many theists are prepared to admit they might be wrong? Damn few, God smites you for that sort of thing, dontcha know. OK, I’ll admit I could be wrong. I could be wrong about a lot of things, insert boilerplate about being a brain in a vat here.

Doesn’t mean I really believe I’m a brain in a vat. Maybe I am, but I don’t think so. Maybe God loves me. Maybe he does, but I don’t think so, nothing I’ve ever seen leads me to believe God loves me. Maybe God exists. Maybe he does, but I don’t think so, nothing I’ve ever seen leads me to believe God exists. And unless you can show me something I’ve never seen or heard before (which I’m confident you won’t), you’re not going to change my mind. Is that arrogant? Whatever, I’m arrogant then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/263 "2006-03-28T23:16:19Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> That is an arguement against God, not god.

It’s an arguement against God, god, GOD, _God_, **GOD** , and god too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/264 "2006-03-28T23:17:48Z")

</div>

> [@JustAnotherGeek](#):
>
> All we are trying to do is get “America [to] trust atheists,” not get all Americans to _be_ atheists.

For some this is not enough. Don’t you know that religion is evil and responsible for all bad things. Everyone must acknowledge that or they are simple-minded fools easily enchanted with fairy dust and children’s tales.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Der\_Trihs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/der_trihs/32/233_2.png) [@Der\_Trihs](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Der_Trihs)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/265 "2006-03-28T23:21:37Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> For some this is not enough. Don’t you know that religion is evil and responsible for all bad things.

Not all; just a great many.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/266 "2006-03-28T23:24:38Z")

</div>

> [@Lemur866](#):
>
> :rolleyes: …I’m arrogant then.

Eureka! Complete agreement. Next topic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tomndebb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/b9e5f3/32.png) [@tomndebb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tomndebb)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/267 "2006-03-28T23:25:36Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> For some this is not enough. Don’t you know that religion is evil and responsible for all bad things. Everyone must acknowledge that or they are simple-minded fools easily enchanted with fairy dust and children’s tales.

Sorry. Straw man. Invoking the most extreme positions of a rabid proselytizer of atheism is a not a valid way to describe the thoughts of most atheists any more than pointing at Pat Robertson or Fred Phelps or Jack Chick is a valid reference to my Christianity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/268 "2006-03-28T23:27:32Z")

</div>

> [@InvisibleWombat](#):
>
> Hear, hear!
> 
> It appears to me after slogging through this thread that the theists _believe on faith_ that a god exists, where atheists _believe on faith_ that no god exists. I see no more validity in viewpoint than the other, as each side is taking a position without adequate evidence to support it. Only the agnostics admit that they don’t know.

Good post. I might substitute “are of the opinon” for “believe on faith”, but good summation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![David\_Simmons](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9de053/32.png) [@David\_Simmons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_Simmons)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/269 "2006-03-28T23:27:35Z")

</div>

I have trouble believing that at this late date anyone trots out the “uncaused first cause.” I also have trouble believing that those who do so don’t see that identifying that “uncaused first cause” with any particular “cause” is purely arbitrary. It’s like trying to specify the smallest number that is greater than zero.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/270 "2006-03-28T23:30:37Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> For some this is not enough. Don’t you know that religion is evil and responsible for all bad things. Everyone must acknowledge that or they are simple-minded fools easily enchanted with fairy dust and children’s tales.

But Magellan, you reject 97% of what most people call religion yourself. You believe it’s a fairy tale as well. You don’t believe Jesus died for your sins, you don’t believe he was resurrected from the dead, you don’t believe in the virgin birth, you don’t believe the Archangel Gabriel whispered the Quran into Muhammed’s ear, you don’t believe Shiva broke Ganesh’s tusk, you don’t believe Kronos was tricked into swallowing a rock instead of the infant Zeus. You’d classify all that stuff as fairy dust, right?

I’ve got no problem with you believing is some mysterious something. But most people actually do believe the fairy dust. Ask most people in America if Jesus was the Son of God, what answer do you think you’re going to get? Ask people if they believe in Angels, what answer are you going to get? Ask people if they believe in the immortality of the soul, what answer are you going to get?

That’s the fairy tale, and people really really do believe it. You know it, and I know it. You reject it, I reject it. And a lot of it really is pernicious nonsense. Yeah, not all of it, Jesus had some pretty reasonable thing to say about how great it would be if everyone were nice to each other for a change. But he also made some mistakes. Wouldn’t people be better off if everyone realized Jesus was just some guy? Or that Muhammed was just some guy?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paranoid\_Randroid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/paranoid_randroid/32/18_2.png) [@Paranoid\_Randroid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Paranoid_Randroid)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/271 "2006-03-28T23:31:49Z")

</div>

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> For some this is not enough. Don’t you know that religion is evil and responsible for all bad things. Everyone must acknowledge that or they are simple-minded fools easily enchanted with fairy dust and children’s tales.

Most atheists debating in this thread denounce the kind of attitude that Der Trihs displays. You’re being disingenuous.

Perhaps you can explain something to me: What is it about believing in an uncaused first cause that makes you a theist, specifically? What I’d like to know is the manner in which an uncaused first cause just is a deity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/272 "2006-03-28T23:32:18Z")

</div>

> [@tomndebb](#):
>
> Sorry. Straw man. Invoking the most extreme positions of a rabid proselytizer of atheism is a not a valid way to describe the thoughts of most atheists any more than pointing at Pat Robertson or Fred Phelps or Jack Chick is a valid reference to my Christianity.

You’re right. But that is not what I did. Please reread the first two words:

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> For some this is not enough.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2006, 11:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/273 "2006-03-28T23:41:22Z")

</div>

> [@Diogenes the Cynic](#):
>
> I would like to see a show (maybe something similar in format to the X-Files) about a caharacter or characters who investigate alleged paranormal phenomena and debunk them, explaining in deatil how things are faked and providing ample Sagan-esque commentaries on critical thinking and empirical method.

[Something like this?](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063950/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e99b99/32.png) [@Diogenes\_the\_Cynic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diogenes_the_Cynic)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 12:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/274 "2006-03-29T00:14:27Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> [Something like this?](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063950/)

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sinjin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ebca7d/32.png) [@sinjin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sinjin)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/275 "2006-03-29T00:41:42Z")

</div>

> [@David Simmons](#):
>
> I have trouble believing that at this late date anyone trots out the “uncaused first cause.” I also have trouble believing that those who do so don’t see that identifying that “uncaused first cause” with any particular “cause” is purely arbitrary. It’s like trying to specify the smallest number that is greater than zero.

Wait. It’s 1, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Revenant\_Threshold](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/f1d935/32.png) [@Revenant\_Threshold](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Revenant_Threshold)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/276 "2006-03-29T00:46:33Z")

</div>

> [@Lemur866](#):
>
> You are SURE that there was an uncaused first cause, right?

> [@magellan01](#):
>
> I have come to that conclusion. I have said that I may very well be wrong. I am completely open to the possibility.

So you’re an agnostic, **magellan**?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![magellan01](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@magellan01](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/magellan01)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/277 "2006-03-29T01:12:17Z")

</div>

> [@Revenant Threshold](#):
>
> So you’re an agnostic, **magellan**?

Though I have little doubt that this will be followed by your usual snideness neatly wrapped in polite sincerity, I will assume you have not read the thread (where it has been implied many times and stated outright) and answer it.

I believe in god. I believe that god willed us into existence. I am very certian of that. I cannot fathom any other scenario. There had to be a First Cause, en vouge or not. The claims that this problem can be explainied away by QM, Multiverses, etc. have been empty so far. I do not think that will change. Yet, since I am not god, and therefore, fallible, I leave room for the possibility that I may be wrong.

Play with that as you will.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cervaise](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cervaise/32/16693_2.png) [@Cervaise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cervaise)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 1:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/278 "2006-03-29T01:50:05Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> [Something like this?](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063950/)

[Scooby-Doo is a fucking sellout whore](http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0166792).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![David\_Simmons](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9de053/32.png) [@David\_Simmons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_Simmons)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/279 "2006-03-29T02:02:31Z")

</div>

> [@sinjin](#):
>
> Wait. It’s 1, right?

You mean 1/2 isn’t a number? “Number” isn’t restricted to the integers. or natural numbers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cosmosdan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/a6a055/32.png) [@cosmosdan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cosmosdan)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2006, 3:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906/280 "2006-03-29T03:06:40Z")

</div>

> [@clairobscur](#):
>
> No, it doesn’t. An actual bearbed man creator god provides an equally adequate answer to questions people answer to with a more elaborate conception of god. Many theists have been content with a very simple conception of god/gods, and actually many still are.
> 
> No, there isn’t. Since there isn’t any evidence for the existence of the supernatural creature X, it isn’t more plausible than another randomly picked supernatural creature. A “complex” god, a bearbed human-like creator, Odin, an elaborate belief in river spirits in a shamanistic culture, a fairy-tale-like river-spirit are all equally plausible, because there’s exactly as much evidence for all of them.
> 
> The already mentionned “invisible dragon in the garage” doesn’t become more plausible just because I provide to you a detailled description of its anatomy, or give it some complex and difficult to grasp attribute. The IPU isn’t more plausible because it’s invisible and pink. Similarily, making your god more abtract doesn’t make it more plausible than a simple, basic concept of a very powerful bearbed man.

I’d like to raise an objection to this type of argument that I see over and over again here on the SDMB. Repeatedly it’s said that there is no evidence for any god or God’s. The problem I have with this is the existence of subjective evidence. Many people {like myself} have beliefs that are born not simply from making up arbitrary reasons but from personal experiences. These experiences cannot be shared in an objective way with skeptics and are subject to our own flawed interpretation yet I would not pronounce the evidence as invalid or meaningless because of it’s subjective nature.

I can accept that it is invalid and meaningless to you and I have no problem with that. That’s why I believe we should try and respect a persons right to choose their own journey when it comes to beliefs. Through interaction we will influence each other but ultimately an individual bears the responsibility of choosing their own path and the consequences of those choices. That’s where laws come in.

Of course we have people on either side who tend to want to testify and be “right” rather than accept the individuals right to choose for themselves. That may be necessary to. Without some passion how would we advance? Those who feel that need better be prepared for the conflict that goes with it.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906.md?page=13)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-america-trust-atheists/349906.md?page=15)
