Can Democrats actually stop the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh?

:dubious: Are you trying to suggest that “it simply never occurred to [you] that anything morally wrong was going on” during those incidents?

Because that’s what you’re claiming here about sexual assault: that it was brushed off as no big deal because “it was just the way life was”, and its perpetrators were thought of “either as an asshole or merely as someone who got carried away”, but the victims “wouldn’t think some great moral outrage had occurred”.

I’m guessing, though, that you would argue that the criminals who assaulted or threatened you were in fact doing something morally wrong.

What is this supposed to prove? Only non-virgins attempt rape?

Haha. Nerd!

Why is it always “hate” with you people? Disapproval does not equal hate. Nor does criticism.

But I digress.

You are conflating my comments about shame over the attempted rape with shame over juvenile misbehavior.

Is it really your position that the shame she carried all those years, keeping it all inside as she finished high school, wearing her white dress at graduation and keeping it all inside, was due to her shame at having attended an underage drinking party?

Jesus.

I’ve been following the Kavanaugh fiasco like a hawk and damn, I don’t have much to say beyond that confirming him is going to do so goddamn much to delegitimize the Court and make the case for Court-packing that much easier.

Maybe we’ll all be better off in some weird way because SCOTUS is such a miserable, terrible institution already.

But will there be sharks with frickin’ laser beams coming out of their heads??

I mean, throw me a bone here, people.

That he’s not that “type” of guy. This is a PR campaign. Plus, it’s very easy to disprove.

I’m guessing he didn’t get belligerent drunk in high school or for many years thereafter, either.

So if any of these worthies turned up as Trump’s SCOTUS nominee years later, you would be just fine with that?

One of the many examples of GOP leaders believing their base are idiots.

I read his post a few times before ultimately declining to respond, but yes, I believe that is his point. As long as a person’s behavior doesn’t cause lifelong trauma, that person is fit for the supreme court.

I defy you to read his post and come to any other conclusion.

Well, it worked for Principal Skinner.

No.

Any idea why I might draw that distinction?

Well, this has been fun, kids, but I got chit to do. Later.

At a guess, based on what you’ve posted in this thread: Is it because you think the criminal behavior of your attackers was morally wrong but don’t think teenage boys sexually assaulting teenage girls is morally wrong?

The TV just reported that Senator Collins has said that the 2nd accuser should also have the chance to testify to the Senate under oath.

Kavanaugh has taken to Fox News, so that ought to rally all of those who can’t bear actual news.

What Happened To Brett Kavanaugh Booster Louisa Garry?

Oh, I have several ideas, but rather than risk besmirching your character (moreso than you have already done yourself, anyway), I’ll let you explain your reasoning.

Well, anyone who watches TV anyway. Haven’t seen it myself, and had no idea who Louisa Garry was until a few hours ago.

So far in the interview Kav seems scripted. He needs to pick up his game before Thursday.