So we have yet another person speaking out who is unexpectedly in Team KavaNO.
Why does it seem as though the defenders on this board see nothing notable about the fact that so many people and institutions are against this nominee? Doesn’t it say something about Kavanaugh that there are so few in the legal community singing his praises right now? Surely his critics aren’t all left wing partisans.
Seriously, dude, what does this have to do with anything?
Ah, the Koch Brothers are “some social media asshole.”
I’d concur about the ‘asshole’ part (though I’d make it plural, obviously), but one out of four isn’t a great batting average on such a simple ID.
They’re peer-pressure pussies just like everybody else.
Why don’t you take a poll and find out how all your co-workers feel and act accordingly and tell everyone you know about it?
The only way for him to do that is if he can keep a vote from happening. How long can he manage that trick?
Props for the Marx Bros reference, otherwise I give you no weight.
They didn’t give him a hearing. When they have given him a hearing maybe you have a contribution?
This is a warning for personal insults. You’re also trolling this thread but I’m not going to give you two warnings at the same time.
You are no longer allowed to post in this thread.
[/moderating]
Nope - what the Repubs did was far worse than that. Of course, you know that.
Not going to read the Daily Mail. Anyone want to take one for the team and let me know if there’s anything in this story that’s not already in Keyser’s public statement from some time ago (that she didn’t remember the party, but did support Ford)?
Is there any evidence that he WAS a sex offender?
This is awfully weak, even for you.
Oh brother.
And that’s a warning for not obeying moderator instructions. Calm down.
Oh.
How’s that?
Another warning is you. You are suspended for 3 days. If you come back and post in this thread, you will be banned.
[/moderating]
The number of potential witnesses ignored by the FBI is troubling. One I’d like to hear from, under oath, is the professor at Princeton Theological Seminary who has what sounds like very relevant information about the Deborah Ramirez accusation:
Of course “nothing” will come from an investigation that has been instructed to ignore potential witnesses. What the right doesn’t seem to acknowledge is that tearing down institutions this way–and this cover-up “investigation” has done exactly that to both the Senate and the Supreme Court–will not ultimately benefit the right. Too many Americans will note the fakery, and will resent the contempt in which Republicans clearly hold their intelligence.
What? I can’t count the number of times that I’ve been told that “This is just a job interview.” People don’t get job interviews all the time.
It looks like the FBI report contains information passed along to FBI - 1,600 pages worth. I’m not saying that’s an excuse for not interviewing some of those witnesses if the FBI wanted to, but that information from non-interviewed witnesses is available for the Senators to review.
Or “review.”
I think your voice-to-text app needs some fine-tuning. 