Can Democrats actually stop the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh?

It’s an example of “theatrics”

You mean like the way they wouldn’t dream of coming up with a conspiracy theory (already debunked, of course) about how Dr. Ford’s accusation was revenge for Kavanaugh’s mother having foreclosed on Ford’s parents’ house?

Yep, nobody’s attacking her.

I think you are mixing two women’s issues that women don’t march lockstep on.

Women are pretty much united in sexual assault is bad and we aren’t always treated with respect in the world - and this sucks.

But the other issues - abortion being the elephant in the room - women are MUCH more divided on. There are plenty of women who are anti-choice - and plenty who are not black and white on the issue.

So this changes that math fairly significantly. Having a guy who allegedly tried to force himself on someone at a party while blackout drunk - thats a humiliation a lot of us have personal experience with - us, a friend, a daughter. Or something worse. Or something similar in nature (but that one is NOT uncommon - and was not uncommon in the 1980s. I escaped one of those in my Freshman year in college - 1984. And you didn’t report it, because that was how the world worked - he didn’t manage to rape you. You have no evidence. My mother escaped one around 1963 by hitting a guy over the head with a coke bottle) Now the pool of disgusted women goes from those that have strong feelings about this country having access to legalized abortion, to all those women who have ever been groped or date raped.

I understand (by your posts) that you’re much, much more interested in downplaying the bad things Dems (“might”) have done.

You don’t understand what “Spartacus” has to do with theatrics? Is that what you’re asking me to clarify?

What’s the bad thing here again? Releasing the documents at an inconvenient time for Republicans? Potentially forcing a delay in the hearings?

And, before you claim that the timing prevents a thorough investigation… the Republicans are in absolute control over the scheduling of this entire process, there is exactly enough time to investigate as the R’s decide there should be. The fact that the Dems are putting them in a position to decide how much time it deserves, is not a bad thing, except for Republicans.

That she chose her political considerations over ensuring that the accuser’s allegations had the best chance to get a thorough investigation.

Well, some of us believe that attempted rape is orders of magnitude worse than political shenanigans about the timing of allegations, but your mileage (apparently) varies.

Why can’t the accuser’s allegations get a thorough investigation now?

Is there some reason that can’t happen? Or are you saying the investigation can happen, but it’s unfair because the process is irregular.

Unfair? I thought there was a “there’s no crying in baseball” rule.

For the falsely accused, as her text makes clear:

Also, are we already forgetting she got doxxed?

NOBODY IS ATTACKING HER. In terms of truth value, this is up there with “everyone loves Donald Trump”.

No, we’ve been talking about your “Is that why Feinstein kept it secret?” bullshit.

Feinstein’s mileage (apparently) varies.

Well, I guess I won’t be supporting Feinstein’s confirmation to the Supreme Court then.

I agree with what you’re saying. I believe you misunderstood that my starting point is now - I’m saying, given where we are already, what are the potential political effects of Kavanaugh’s nomination being confirmed, withdrawn, or rejected by a vote of the Senate?

But you seem to be talking about how the conversation’s changed in the past week, and I agree with you there.

It could happen, might even, but the odds of it happening are less than if Feinstein had shared the information when she learned of it. What kind of a fucking monster would undertake actions that risk this poor woman not being heard and having her story investigated? The Feinstein kind, apparently.

Or calling for her resignation I suspect.

LOL. You be you, HD. It’s fun to watch!

“Theatrics” came from post #1280 which, I don’t think, directly related to the question of why Feinstein kept it secret. It was about whether the Senate or the FBI should handle the investigation.

Dude, this isn’t about the poor little woman being “heard”.

She didn’t want to be heard. She just didn’t want the guy who tried to rape her get put on the Supreme Court.

Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ.