# Can Flies Stop Trains?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [December 12, 2006, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855 "2006-12-12T19:39:26Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Niceotope](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/3ec8ea/32.png) [@Niceotope](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Niceotope)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/1 "2006-12-12T19:39:26Z")

</div>

Hi,

Someone asked me whether Flies can stop trains, with the following explanation:

OK… You have a train traveling 100 mph in one direction and a fly traveling the opposite direction towards it at 10mph. When the fly hits the train’s windshield (presume it’s flat, not aerodynamically curved) there will be a point in time that the fly decelerates from 10mph to 0mph and then is accelerated up to the train’s 100mph speed. I think the laws of physics dictate that there is no way the fly can instantly change from 10mph in one direction to 100mph in the other, so there has to be one point when the Fly is stationary on the windshield. If the Fly is stationary and touching the windshield, then the windshield must at that time be stationary and therefore the train too. So, flies can stop trains…

Clearly not the case in reality, but why not? What’s the scientific (or emotional) explanation for the hypothesis?  
Question from Tom Aldridge at Ringarogy island, Nr Skibberine, Ireland in 1990

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![iamthewalrus\_3](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/258eb7/32.png) [@iamthewalrus\_3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iamthewalrus_3)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/2 "2006-12-12T20:15:53Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If the Fly is stationary and touching the windshield, then the windshield must at that time be stationary and therefore the train too.

This is where your reasoning goes off the tracks. The train and windshield are not a perfectly rigid body, nor is the fly.

The fly doesn’t instantly change direction or speed, nor does the train. Both the fly and the front of the train will deform under the force applied to both of them. Given the relative momentum and strength of each, the fly will deform a bit more than the train will, but nothing will happen “instantaneously”, just very quickly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/3 "2006-12-12T20:21:14Z")

</div>

A small layer of molecules on the surface of the front of the train can move more slowly than the rest of the train for a tiny fraction of a second, then move most quickly for another tiny fraction of a second, without any observable effect on the rest of the train.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/4 "2006-12-12T20:24:30Z")

</div>

Time flies like a train problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/5 "2006-12-12T20:28:44Z")

</div>

Fruit flies like a banana.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hampshire](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hampshire/32/4887_2.png) [@Hampshire](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hampshire)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/6 "2006-12-12T20:30:04Z")

</div>

So what if they both “were” rigid? Say instead of a fly it were a stainless steel ball bearing and instead of a windshield it was the cast iron grill of the locomotive.

Or are you saying it doesn’t matter? The ball bearing will still deform (squash) like a nerf ball and reform to a sphere and that this reforming is it’s 0-100 acceleration independant of the train.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Q.E.D](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/51bf81/32.png) [@Q.E.D](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Q.E.D)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/7 "2006-12-12T20:39:43Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Hampshire]  
The ball bearing will still deform (squash) like a nerf ball and reform to a sphere and that this reforming is it’s 0-100 acceleration independant of the train.  
[/QUOTE]

Right. There’s no such thing as a perfectly rigid object; there will always be some degree of deformation of both the object and the part of the train that’s hit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![WF\_Tomba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/d9b06d/32.png) [@WF\_Tomba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WF_Tomba)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/8 "2006-12-12T20:47:03Z")

</div>

Before the collision, the fly and the train are converging at 110 mph. After the collision they are both stationary. Although other nearby objects such as earth, track, and air may continue to fly by in various speeds and directions, they do not substantially affect the problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/9 "2006-12-12T20:53:34Z")

</div>

Even a steel ball bearing would flatten slightly. (A 20mm bullet hitting the train will still “squash”, lead being a little more, umm, elastic? Is that the right word? Less tensile strength?)

Your wondering how the tensile strengths of the two objects will hold up in kinetic impacts with near similar objects. That requires involving metalurgy as well as Newtonian physics.

A standard bb-sized steel ball bearing, 10 mph, has kinetic energy of mass \* speed applied to front of an iron train. Since train weighs many tons, the speed effect on the train effect is not noticable. (But it _is_ calculable.) The surface of the train at the point of impact will be effected based on the material the train is made of. Iron is reasonably strong. I expect a small ding, scratched paint in the case of an iron train vs steel bb.

The iron train, many tons, moving at 100 mph, applies _it’s_ kinetic potential to the bb. The effect is more pronounced, even though steel is stronger than iron. (It had to absorb much more energy.) A deformity in the spherical shape of the bb, if you can find the bb in the grass afterwards.

Make the train out of Bleau Cheese however, and the bb may not show any deformity…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/10 "2006-12-12T21:02:04Z")

</div>

This isn’t just a more sophisticated version of Zeno’s arrow paradox, is it?

[QUOTE=Wikipedia]  
Finally, in the arrow paradox, we imagine an arrow in flight. At every moment in time, the arrow is located at a specific position. If the moment is just a single instant, then the arrow does not have time to move and is at rest during that instant. Now, during the following instants, it then must also be at rest for the same reason. The arrow is always at rest and cannot move: motion is impossible.  
[/QUOTE]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/11 "2006-12-12T21:10:56Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> This isn’t just a more sophisticated version of Zeno’s arrow paradox, is it?

Motion _is_ distance traveled over time. Remove time, and what are you trying to measure?

Besides, even if I could freeze time, the arrow will still have some kind of kinetic energy potential bound up in it, wouldn’t it? (Speed \* weight, or something?) Which, if you knew how to measure that potential while frozen in time, would allow you to tell the diff between a stationary arrow and one in flight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rocksolid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/8797f3/32.png) [@rocksolid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rocksolid)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/12 "2006-12-12T21:41:44Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=mlees]  
Even a steel ball bearing would flatten slightly. (A 20mm bullet hitting the train will still “squash”, lead being a little more, umm, elastic? Is that the right word? Less tensile strength?)  
[/QUOTE]

From what little i remember from my materials classes…

Elastic limit - Point at which a material/object will no longer return to original shape after deformation

Plastic limit - point at which a material/object will no longer deform intact but instead shear, tear, snap etc

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mlees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba8739/32.png) [@mlees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mlees)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/13 "2006-12-12T21:47:25Z")

</div>

Thanks, **rocksolid**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Santo\_Rugger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e95f7d/32.png) [@Santo\_Rugger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Santo_Rugger)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/14 "2006-12-12T22:14:26Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=mlees]  
Even a steel ball bearing would flatten slightly. (A 20mm bullet hitting the train will still “squash”, lead being a little more, umm, elastic? Is that the right word? Less tensile strength?)

[/QUOTE]

Value of E, elasticity, stiffness, modulus of elasticity, or Young’s modulus will all work. It’s defined by Hooke’s law, which states that the stress is equal to E times strain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![flight](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/bbce88/32.png) [@flight](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flight)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/15 "2006-12-12T22:44:55Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Q.E.D.]  
Right. There’s no such thing as a perfectly rigid object; there will always be some degree of deformation of both the object and the part of the train that’s hit.  
[/QUOTE]

An depending on relative velocities this can be far more than you would think possible. I have seen some high speed video of impacts that show how truly elastic objects that we think of as solid are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![David\_Simmons](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9de053/32.png) [@David\_Simmons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_Simmons)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 10:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/16 "2006-12-12T22:56:04Z")

</div>

As was pointed out, the fly and locomotive front end aren’t rigid. They will deform so as to allow the fly’s change in velocity to take place. The whole fly does what the OP said, but only part of the locomotive does.

The deformation of the locomotive really happens. Raindrops will knock small pieces out of the leading edge of jet aircraft wins leaving them pitted. In that case, the deformation has exceeded the elastic limit, and even the ultimate strength of the material resulting in rupture.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![David\_Simmons](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9de053/32.png) [@David\_Simmons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/David_Simmons)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/17 "2006-12-12T23:01:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=flight]  
An depending on relative velocities this can be far more than you would think possible. I have seen some high speed video of impacts that show how truly elastic objects that we think of as solid are.  
[/QUOTE]  
Yeah. Just look at the super slo mo pictures of a golf ball when one of the touring pros hits it with a driver. The ball deforms by about 1/4" and then takes off. I suspect it’s similar to **Colibri’s** description of how a flock of birds changes direction. The deformation initiates a wave of motion that that travels through the ball and gets the whole thing moving.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![danceswithcats](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9e8a1a/32.png) [@danceswithcats](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/danceswithcats)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 11:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/18 "2006-12-12T23:03:04Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=silenus]  
Fruit flies like a banana.  
[/QUOTE]

What if the fly is on a treadmill?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 11:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/19 "2006-12-12T23:55:19Z")

</div>

Rats, late again. But surely if the locomotive were on the airplane’s treadmill it would end up going _backwards_ (albeit, very very slowly) upon the collision with the fly, would it not? Provided the treadmill kept a constant speed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Contrapuntal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e274bd/32.png) [@Contrapuntal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Contrapuntal)
#### Post date: [December 12, 2006, 11:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855/20 "2006-12-12T23:59:16Z")

</div>

Tangentially, what is the last thing that goes through a fly’s mind after he hits the windshield?

His butthole.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-flies-stop-trains/383855.md?page=2)
