Y’know, Snake, the line between funny and incoherent is about ten feet behind you.
Right. It does not, by any stretch of the imagination, mean “one who, in the absence of proof of something, denies the existence of said thing,” which is the way you keep using it. Find the right word. Surprise us.
But miles ahead of you. You can’t even tell the difference.
Why don’t you do it, Out. I’m not here to play your petty guessing games.
Hey, I’m just trying to help you. If you’re going to use words in ways that don’t conform to their commonly-accepted definitions, no one is going to understand what you’re trying to say, and you’re going to have trouble understanding what they’re trying to tell you. Wouldn’t you agree?
Hey, if the line is miles ahead of me, then I’m comfortably in Funnyland and nowhere near Incoherentstan. Thanks!
Bryan Ekers: you have already shown yourself in this thread, and specifically by this post that you are living happily in fantasyland.
Using your own post to prove something about me, a post that contains the deeep question “If these pilots are capable of flying, as they claim, why don’t they go up to the moon and bring us back some moon rocks?”
That’s convincing.
On reflection, since SnakeSpirit brought it up, I’d like to quite another section from “this post”:
and a quite from my reply:
Apparrently, I mispelled “apparent”, twice. I hope that won’t count against me.
And I’ve typed “quite” twice, when I meant “quote”. Sigh.
You need to take a break, Ekers.
Do us all a favor.
We’ll be spared your poor science in your posts, and you can get some evidently well-needed rest.
Even with the embarassment of typos, I feel confident I can casually trounce you at debating, at least on this subject. In fact, I feel I already have.
I haven’t seen you substantiate one point, Eker, an I don’t count your typos, only petty people hold typos against an argument.
So, what points have you made, and what points of mine have you disproven?
Briefly please*, how have you trounced me at debating? I don’t see it.
- (Please spare us your fifteen paragraph puff-pieces)
We’d like some substantiatioon of your extraordinary claims.
SnakeS
Is it petty to hold typos against the man making the argument? I haven’t seen you successfully attack an argument for some time, now, using ad hominems instead.
If you’re going to speak on behalf of “we”, I’ll let the readers of this thread voice an opinion on whose claims have been the more extraordinary before I bother adding to the substantiation I’ve already provided and which you so casually and incorrectly dismiss.
Polling is more appropriate in another forum, but if you want to start one, put invites here and in “what is paranormal” and I’ll accept.
Personally, I was hoping for people posting to this thread (if there are any more, it seems to have died) to throw in a sentence or two no the matter. I would have preferred to not inflict this nonsense onto the good people at IMHO. Oh, well…
I don’t think so. You can keep your popularity contest here in Great Debates.
How surprising.
A moderator who is actively involved in a debate denies the appropriate forum for the debate, and insists it be kept in an inappropriate forum.
Polls are no longer permitted in IMHO?
So, then, where do we take our polls?