>>hijack<<< Why are you taught to hate WM.
I don’t get this at all, it’s a store 
I had quoted a paragraph from Keeton & Widiss, and insurance law treaty, but the hamsters ate it. Let me summarize:
-
There will still be funeral costs. Should I buy life insurance on my child's life? | III
-
Courts are willing to relax the insurable interest doctrine somewhat in the case of family members. By extension, they don’t strictly apply the principle of indemnity to family member-life insurance.
-
In fact, life insurance, generally isn’t subject to the principle of indemnity, at least generally, in most states. If I’m the beneficiary of a $250,000 life insurance policy, I don’t have to prove up losses of $250,000 in order to recover full benefit. I just have to prove that the insured is dead.
-
There were some issues, historically, with child life insurance.* It was sold door-to-door based on the funeral costs theory. Parents would buy it and pay premiums with money they could have spent on medical care and food.
*based on an insurance law lecture from long ago given by this guy Newsroom - The Source - Washington University in St. Louis . I could be misinformed or have it all jumbled up in my head.
Google
Wal-Mart sucks
and spent 15 minutes reading the results.
It’s complicated, and the answer is off-topic in this thread.
He sells t-shirts with the Pope’s face in one of those Ghostbusters-style red crossout circles. New pope = lots of unsellable inventory. 