# Can military tanks go backward as fast as forward?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [April 17, 2024, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414 "2024-04-17T17:26:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/1 "2024-04-17T17:26:34Z")

</div>

Inspired by a side discussion here:

> [@Russia invades Ukraine {2022-02-24} (Part 2)](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/russia-invades-ukraine-2022-02-24-part-2/973972/7114):
>
> That’ll work, as long as the tank puts its shoes on backwards (or drives everywhere backwards).

Do military battle tanks have the ability to travel backwards as fast as they can travel forwards? I’m wondering whether, once you identify an asymmetry in the “footprint” on the ground from a passing tank, you can reliably determine what direction it was moving.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dorjan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dorjan/32/12440_2.png) [@Dorjan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dorjan)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/2 "2024-04-17T17:27:36Z")

</div>

No where close to as fast as they can move forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 5:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/3 "2024-04-17T17:28:24Z")

</div>

So if they needed to cover, say, a mile of ground, they’d almost certainly be traveling forward?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dorjan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dorjan/32/12440_2.png) [@Dorjan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dorjan)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/4 "2024-04-17T17:31:40Z")

</div>

yes unless they are in a fighting retreat, then they might want to go backwards (tanks generally are more heavily armored in front). Some tanks can reverse at a pretty decent clip (although still nowhere near fast as they can go forward). Russian tanks are notorious for their painfully slow reverse speeds, BTW.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gnoitall](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/bb73d2/32.png) [@gnoitall](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gnoitall)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/5 "2024-04-17T17:35:11Z")

</div>

> [@Dorjan](#):
>
> Russian tanks are notorious for their painfully slow reverse speeds, BTW.

The spirit of Stalin lives on.

> **[Order No. 227](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_No._227)**
>
> Order No. 227 (Russian: Приказ № 227, romanized: Prikaz No. 227) was an order issued on 28 July 1942 by Joseph Stalin, who was acting as the People's Commissar of Defence. It is known for its line "Not a step back!" (Ни шагу назад!, Ni shagu nazad!), which became the primary slogan of the Soviet press in summer 1942.
> Order No. 227 established that each front must create one to three penal battalions (Russian: штрафной батальон, romanized: shtrafnoy batalyon, lit. 'penalty battalion', commonly kn...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/6 "2024-04-17T20:04:22Z")

</div>

> [@Dorjan](#):
>
> Russian tanks are notorious for their painfully slow reverse speeds, BTW.

The T-72 is the real offender here, only able to achieve ~4km/h in reverse. The T-64/T-80 can achieve the more reasonable ~20km/h. Still slower than the reverse speed of most modern Western MBTs; the [M1A2](https://www.newsweek.com/how-germany-leopard-2-tanks-compare-us-m1-abrams-ukraine-ramstein-1775318#:~:text=The%20M1A2%20SEP%20Abrams%20has,69.5%20tons%20and%2073.6%20tons.) for example can do 42mph forwards and 25mph in reverse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/7 "2024-04-17T20:07:51Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> Still slower than the reverse speed of most modern Western MBTs; the [M1A2](https://www.newsweek.com/how-germany-leopard-2-tanks-compare-us-m1-abrams-ukraine-ramstein-1775318#:~:text=The%20M1A2%20SEP%20Abrams%20has,69.5%20tons%20and%2073.6%20tons.) for example can do 42mph forwards and 25mph in reverse.

I’m told by a reliable and knowledgeable source that they can go much faster than that, at least forward.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [April 17, 2024, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/8 "2024-04-17T20:11:51Z")

</div>

If you remove the engine governor and want to destroy the drivetrain, sure, it can. [Just not for very long](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_Abrams#Mobility).

> The M1 Abrams’s [powertrain](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powertrain) consists of an AGT1500 [multifuel](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multifuel) gas turbine (originally made by [Lycoming](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_Engines), now [Honeywell](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeywell)) capable of 1,500 shaft horsepower (1,100 kW) at 30,000 [rpm](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutions_per_minute) and 395 lb⋅ft (536 N⋅m) at 10,000 rpm and a six-speed (four forward, two reverse) [Allison](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Transmission) X-1100-3B Hydro-Kinetic [automatic transmission](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_transmission). This gives it a governed top speed of 45 mph (72 km/h) on paved roads, and 30 mph (48 km/h) cross-country. With the engine governor removed, speeds of around 60 mph (97 km/h) are possible on an improved surface. However, damage to the drivetrain (especially to the tracks) and an increased risk of injuries to the crew can occur at speeds above 45 mph (72 km/h).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2024, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/9 "2024-04-18T12:55:27Z")

</div>

A lot of it is doctrinal from what I understand.

Western doctrine typically has tanks fighting from what’s called a “hull-down” position. Basically, the tank tries to just show its turret and gun above the crest of a rise/hill/ridge of some sort, to provide the smallest target and only expose the most robust armor. To do this successfully, you have to have a pretty good depression on your gun and some ability to go in reverse quick to get away/hide/reposition once they’ve seen you.

Here’s a diagram of “hull down”:

[Hull down tank diagram - Hull down - Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hull_down#/media/File:Hull_down_tank_diagram.png)

Soviet doctrine (I say Soviet, because all the Russian tanks are variants of old Soviet designs) emphasized attacking and as such, don’t emphasize reverse speed or gun depression. They also emphasize very small heights (for a tank), which also de-emphasizes gun depression.

So Western tanks tend to be able to go in reverse fairly quickly, while Russian ones can’t. And Russian ones tend not to have great gun depression either, so they’re not as good in hull-down positions.

Here’s an example of how the Ukrainians are taking advantage of this:

[Mixing Leopard 2s And M-2s, The Ukrainian 47th Brigade Hits And Runs (forbes.com)](https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2023/11/11/mixing-leopard-2-tanks-and-m-2-fighting-vehicles-in-fast-moving-teams-the-ukrainian-47th-brigade-hits-and-runs-and-blunts-russian-advances-near-avdiivka/?sh=2bc3cc558740)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [April 18, 2024, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-military-tanks-go-backward-as-fast-as-forward/1000414/10 "2024-04-18T13:22:25Z")

</div>

I believe it was Helmut Schmidt who was discussing WWII with some German soldiers and was heard to remark that Italian tanks had only reverse gears.
