# Can Prince Charles (UK) Choose Any Name When He Becomes King?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [November 3, 2010, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351 "2010-11-03T17:43:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mollie\_Magill](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mollie_magill/32/20882_2.png) [@Mollie\_Magill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mollie_Magill)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/21 "2010-11-03T20:00:30Z")

</div>

> [@Tristan](#):
>
> I was under the impression, based on Charles conversion to Catholicism, that he would most likely abdicate the throne in favor of his son?
> 
> Or am I wrong on that account?

You may be thinking of Tony Blair.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9de053/32.png) [@Jackknifed\_Juggernaut](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackknifed_Juggernaut)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/22 "2010-11-03T20:04:59Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> The last [King John](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John,_King_of_England) and the last two King Richards ([II](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_II_of_England) and [III](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_III_of_England)) are generally agreed to be Bad Kings.

Wow, I was assuming that it was a joke, since John can mean ‘toilet’ and Richard can mean ‘dick’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/23 "2010-11-03T20:12:52Z")

</div>

> [@Tristan](#):
>
> I was under the impression, based on Charles conversion to Catholicism, that he would most likely abdicate the throne in favor of his son?
> 
> Or am I wrong on that account?

> [@Giles](#):
>
> The last [King John](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John,_King_of_England) and the last two King Richards ([II](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_II_of_England) and [III](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_III_of_England)) are generally agreed to be Bad Kings.

Charles is unlikely to pick “Charles III” for similar reasons. Charles I and Charles II were Stewarts, reigned during a tumultuous period, and Charles I was beheaded – the name “Charles” is closely associated with the Stewart pretenders. “James” is unlikely to be used again for the same reason. My WAG is that Edward VIII has killed the name “Edward” for the future as well.

So, George VII, and then William V (or Henry IX, if it comes to that).

Albert is out, out of respect for Victoria’s husband. And Arthur is out, out of respect for Henry VIII’s elder brother. Unless the royal family suddenly gets creative, it’s going to be George, William, Henry, Elizabeth, or Victoria, from now on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/24 "2010-11-03T20:14:54Z")

</div>

I think we can all agree that Tony Blair will never be king now.  
😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Markxxx](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/5daacb/32.png) [@Markxxx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Markxxx)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/25 "2010-11-03T20:15:31Z")

</div>

So basically he can pick what name he wants. Yes, I understand there would be pressure if he picked a dumb name or an unpopular name (King Hitler for instance) but what I’m reading is there is no law that would forbid him or require someone else’s approval.

I was asking about UK royalty in general, not Charles in specific.

So if he did pick a name no one liked, what could they do? Force him to abdicate? Not recognize him as king? Or become a republic?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Smeghead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/f1d935/32.png) [@Smeghead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Smeghead)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/26 "2010-11-03T20:17:35Z")

</div>

I think he should go with King Obama, just to mess with the world.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/27 "2010-11-03T20:18:26Z")

</div>

> [@Markxxx](#):
>
> So basically he can pick what name he wants. Yes, I understand there would be pressure if he picked a dumb name or an unpopular name (King Hitler for instance) but what I’m reading is there is no law that would forbid him or require someone else’s approval.
> 
> I was asking about UK royalty in general, not Charles in specific.
> 
> So if he did pick a name no one liked, what could they do? Force him to abdicate? Not recognize him as king? Or become a republic?

The monarch’s job is to be as popular as he can manage, so it’s not going to come to that.

It’s very hard to get definitive answers to questions like this. There are too many unspoken rules and unexercised powers involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Polycarp](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/82dd89/32.png) [@Polycarp](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Polycarp)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/28 "2010-11-03T20:19:12Z")

</div>

> [@Tristan](#):
>
> I was under the impression, based on Charles conversion to Catholicism, that he would most likely abdicate the throne in favor of his son?
> 
> Or am I wrong on that account?

If he had in fact converted, the Act of Settlement would act to disqualify him. But what evidence is supposed to be there that he converted? That he visited the Pope once?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/29 "2010-11-03T20:22:08Z")

</div>

> [@acsenray](#):
>
> t).
> 
> Unless the royal family suddenly gets creative, it’s going to be George, William, Henry, Elizabeth, or Victoria, from now on.

I wonder if Mary is back in the game now, after QEII’s grandmother. It might be different for a Queen regnant though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Baron\_Greenback](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/baron_greenback/32/48_2.png) [@Baron\_Greenback](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Baron_Greenback)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/30 "2010-11-03T20:24:49Z")

</div>

> [@Markxxx](#):
>
> So if he did pick a name no one liked, what could they do? Force him to abdicate? Not recognize him as king? Or become a republic?

Parliament can do whatever it likes with regard to the Royal Family. It’s a foolish Monarch who disregards the “advice” of the Prime Minister.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/31 "2010-11-03T20:26:17Z")

</div>

> [@acsenray](#):
>
> … And Arthur is out, out of respect for Henry VIII’s elder brother.

I would not have thought that Arthur, Prince of Wales, would have spoiled the name. He died at the age of 15 more than 500 years ago, and his main contribution to history was his widow marrying his younger brother – which led to problems between the Church of England and the Church of Rome. The problem really would be associations with the legendary King Arthur – and that association might be positive, on the whole.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/32 "2010-11-03T20:28:05Z")

</div>

> [@Baron\_Greenback](#):
>
> I wonder if Mary is back in the game now, after QEII’s grandmother. It might be different for a Queen regnant though.

I think Alexandra would be a possibility, too, even if it’s a bit old-fashioned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kent\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kent_clark/32/105_2.png) [@Kent\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kent_Clark)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/33 "2010-11-03T20:35:05Z")

</div>

> [@acsenray](#):
>
> I watched it live and I remember this moment well. It was just Diana who messed it up.
> 
> His name is “Charles Phillip Arthur George.”
> 
> The officiant said “Charles Phillip Arthur George.”
> 
> Diana repeated it as “Charles Arthur Phillip George.”

In the U.S., they probably would have [repeated the whole thing later](http://articles.cnn.com/2009-01-21/politics/obama.oath_1_oath-president-obama-chief-justice-john-roberts?_s=PM:POLITICS) “out of an abundance of caution.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eleanor\_of\_Aquitaine](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a88e4f/32.png) [@Eleanor\_of\_Aquitaine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Eleanor_of_Aquitaine)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/34 "2010-11-03T20:38:08Z")

</div>

> [@acsenray](#):
>
> Albert is out, out of respect for Victoria’s husband. …

I’ve seen this statement before, but I remember reading that Victoria decreed that henceforth all of the males in direct line to the throne should be given the name Albert, because she wanted the name to be used. I think she would have been thrilled with a bunch of King Alberts. The family obeyed her until Elizabeth didn’t give Charles the name.

Edward VII was known as Prince Albert Edward, and I thought Victoria wanted him to become King Albert Edward, but he decided not to do it after her death, because a double name wasn’t British custom. I think he used the excuse of honoring the name Albert by not using it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ximenean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/aca169/32.png) [@Ximenean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ximenean)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/35 "2010-11-03T20:44:03Z")

</div>

I’ll bet anyone a thousand newly-minted Charles III pound coins that he sticks to his actual name.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 8:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/36 "2010-11-03T20:45:04Z")

</div>

Louis, Francis, Geoffrey, and Phillip are too Frenchy – wouldn’t go down well with the British public.

Robert is too closely associated with Scottish independence.

Andrew and Anthony just don’t sound royal.

Stephen was a weak king. Matilda was a tyrant.

Isabelle sounds too foreign.

I wonder if Catherine or Anne might be ready to make a comeback?

Alexander and Nicholas are too czarist.

Paul, Peter, Samuel, Aaron, Jonathan, Daniel, David and other excessively Biblical names wouldn’t fly.

Michael is too continental

Too common-sounding: Arnold, Brian, Alan, Donald, Douglas, Eugene, Leonard, Joseph, Roger

Too Saxon-sounding: Alfred, Edmund, Ernest

Too Nordic: Eric, Frederick

Hm …

Terence? Lawrence? Kenneth (too Scottish)? Patrick (too Irish)? Vincent? Timothy? Thomas?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yabob](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yabob/32/2821_2.png) [@yabob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yabob)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 9:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/37 "2010-11-03T21:01:00Z")

</div>

> [@acsenray](#):
>
> Charles is unlikely to pick “Charles III” for similar reasons. Charles I and Charles II were Stewarts, reigned during a tumultuous period, and Charles I was beheaded – the name “Charles” is closely associated with the Stewart pretenders. “James” is unlikely to be used again for the same reason. My WAG is that Edward VIII has killed the name “Edward” for the future as well.
> 
> So, George VII, and then William V (or Henry IX, if it comes to that).
> 
> Albert is out, out of respect for Victoria’s husband. And Arthur is out, out of respect for Henry VIII’s elder brother. Unless the royal family suddenly gets creative, it’s going to be George, William, Henry, Elizabeth, or Victoria, from now on.

Henry IX actually might have Jacobite problems, also, since [Henry Benedict Stuart](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Benedict_Stuart) was the last Jacobite pretender anybody took seriously, and was styled Henry IX in those circles. Notably, he himself had better sense than to try to press his claim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 9:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/38 "2010-11-03T21:03:00Z")

</div>

With the relatively recent examples of

Albert Frederick Arthur **George VI**

Albert **Edward VII**

Alexandrina **Victoria**

… I think it’s pretty even odds of Charles going with one of his other names.

And hasn’t he already informally run the “George VII” idea up the flag and gotten general agreement?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/39 "2010-11-03T21:04:04Z")

</div>

> [@yabob](#):
>
> Henry IX actually might have Jacobite problems, also, since [Henry Benedict Stuart](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Benedict_Stuart) was the last Jacobite pretender anybody took seriously, and was styled Henry IX in those circles. Notably, he himself had better sense than to try to press his claim.

That’s a good point. As I was writing it, the name “Henry IX” seemed to ring some kind of bell, but I didn’t place it as a Jacobite name.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rocking\_chair](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rocking_chair/32/2918_2.png) [@rocking\_chair](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rocking_chair)\
**Post date:** [November 3, 2010, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351/40 "2010-11-03T21:30:35Z")

</div>

perhaps nigel? reginald? harold?

it is amazing how many names are “right out”, rather difficult to name a heir to the crown.

just go with a name and make your own history with it.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-prince-charles-uk-choose-any-name-when-he-becomes-king/559351.md?page=3)
