# Can the US president carry a weapon?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [January 2, 2006, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105 "2006-01-02T19:22:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 3:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/21 "2006-01-03T03:23:35Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> Yes, with some restrictions. You must be authorized by your agency to carry a firearm

Yeah. Believe it or not there are some police departments where officers don’t carry firearms. Most of them are college or university police, but they are still real cops with arrest powers. I’ve been in law enforcement for 20+ years both full & part-time and couldn’t image not have my sidearm. There is a force continuum that is taught in training, lethal force being at the end of it. How any jurisdiction can’t take that away from an officer is beyond me. I’d be surprised if it hasn’t gotten someone killed.

> [@SaintCad](#):
>
> There is a federal gun permit that supercedes are state and local laws. This is not the same as the Federal Firearm Licence that applies to dealers, but rather a permit to carry a firearm anywhere in the US - even on planes. I suppose that the President could apply for one through the Dept of the Treasury.

I still want to know what you’re talking about here. I’ve never heard of a federal CCW permit. please provide a cite!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cartooniverse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cartooniverse/32/3084_2.png) [@Cartooniverse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cartooniverse)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 3:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/22 "2006-01-03T03:27:50Z")

</div>

> [@alterego](#):
>
> He is a citizen and resident of Washington D.C… As Bricker noted, citizens cannot carry guns in D.C., so as long as he is merely a citizen in DC, he cannot carry.

Perhaps we can not take everything said by a Doper attorney as legal gospel, if no cite is provided? Yes. That might be best. We all do have the same Internet access.

George W. Bush and Laura Bush must legally declare their place of residence on their US 1040 Tax Form, just like everybody else has to. ( No doubt it is against the law to make up a place of residence that is not in fact your legal one and list it on your 1040 Form. )

According to a photocopy of the [actual 2004 Tax Return Filed By George W. Bush and Laura Bush](http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/thpwebsite.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument), their legal residence is as follows:

> [@](#):
>
> Northern Trust Co. PO Box 803938 Chicago, IL. 60680

**THAT** is their legal address as of the 2004 tax year, and they are therefore legally bound by the laws applied to citizens of Illinois. 🙂

It actually doesn’t mean jack shit where a public servant lives while they are serving the public. If I am stationed in Iraq for 2 years, I am not barred from voting in a Presidential election because I’m living in Iraq- and what- suddenly I’m a citizen of Iraq? Sorry. Doesn’t work that way at all.

Their legal address has been provided above. They are not, and do not legally declare themselves to be, citizens of the District of Columbia.

Cartooniverse

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cartooniverse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cartooniverse/32/3084_2.png) [@Cartooniverse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cartooniverse)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/23 "2006-01-03T03:37:29Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> All law enforcement officers & retired officers, whether local/county/state or federal can CCW in all 50 states.

Actually, not all 50 states. For example, as of [December 12th, 2005, Chicago retired officers](http://concealcarry.org/2005/12/big-dummy-chicago-cops-crying-now.html) may not carry, as per Mayor Daley.

[Another cite](http://officer.com/article/article.jsp?siteSection=1&id=27385) on the same story.

Cartooniverse

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alterego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6bbea6/32.png) [@alterego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alterego)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/24 "2006-01-03T03:37:40Z")

</div>

I didn’t take his word for it, and I don’t know what this internet thing is. At any rate, the White House has been the official residence of the POTUS for over 200 years, it wasn’t a long stretch to think that after living there for 8 years he had residency.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/25 "2006-01-03T04:35:48Z")

</div>

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> Their legal address has been provided above. They are not, and do not legally declare themselves to be, citizens of the District of Columbia.

Their legal address is irrelevant. Anyone who is within the city limits is subject to the laws of that jurisdiction, whether they are residents or not. While Dubya is at home in the White House, he is subject to the laws of Washington DC. When he is in Crawford, Texas, he is subject to the laws of that muninicpality. His “legal residence” has no bearing on what laws he must obey.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AskNott](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asknott/32/5790_2.png) [@AskNott](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AskNott)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 4:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/26 "2006-01-03T04:43:31Z")

</div>

As a commander in chief, he is a member of the military. He can carry whatever he pleases, and the Department of Defense will back him up. Why is there any confusion over this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Slant](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c57346/32.png) [@Mr.Slant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Slant)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 4:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/27 "2006-01-03T04:46:02Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Yeah. Believe it or not there are some police departments where officers don’t carry firearms. Most of them are college or university police, but they are still real cops with arrest powers. I’ve been in law enforcement for 20+ years both full & part-time and couldn’t image not have my sidearm. There is a force continuum that is taught in training, lethal force being at the end of it. How any jurisdiction can’t take that away from an officer is beyond me. I’d be surprised if it hasn’t gotten someone killed.  
> SNIP

Flashback to college.  
We had a campus security force separate from, but under the jurisdiction of, the campus police.  
The campus security folks got no sidearms, but did get bullet-proof vests.  
I once worked in the last convenience store in the South to not have surveillance cameras, but working a job where I get to patrol a facility with a bullet-resistand vest on and nothing more dangerous than pepper spray to draw crosses my line from dumb into dumber.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 5:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/28 "2006-01-03T05:00:12Z")

</div>

The federal gun permit is not open to private citizens. It is documentation that a certain person is legally allowed to CCW in plainclothes. It is to avoid issues where a person may not know that a Treasury Agent (for example) is allow to carry weapons. I’ve seen a couple of these since I know a few people that are allowed to CCW for their federal jobs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 5:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/29 "2006-01-03T05:03:03Z")

</div>

[

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> **THAT** is their legal address as of the 2004 tax year, and they are therefore legally bound by the laws applied to citizens of Illinois. 🙂

:eek:  
**Cartooniverse**! You have been on these boards for quite some time. You know better than this.

> [@SaintCad](#):
>
> There is a federal gun permit that supercedes are state and local laws. This is not the same as the Federal Firearm Licence that applies to dealers, but rather a permit to carry a firearm anywhere in the US - even on planes. I suppose that the President could apply for one through the Dept of the Treasury.

20+ years of L.E. & I know nothing of this. **SaintCad** has done a post-n-bail. Can _anyone_ fill me in on this?

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> Actually, not all 50 states. For example, as of [December 12th, 2005, Chicago retired officers](http://concealcarry.org/2005/12/big-dummy-chicago-cops-crying-now.html) may not carry, as per Mayor Daley.

This WILL go to court, and Daley will lose.

QUOTE=AskNott]As a commander in chief, he is a member of the military. He can carry whatever he pleases, and the Department of Defense will back him up. Why is there any confusion over this?  
[/QUOTE]

Cite? By what written legal authority is this true? I’m not saying you’re incorrect, but Simply being a member of the military does not give one the status to carry a weapon anywhere one pleases, especially concealed.  
QUOTE=Mr. Slant]The campus security folks got no sidearms, but did get bullet-proof vests.  
[/QUOTE]

Suicide. But keep in mind there is a difference between security & police. The police have a duty to make arrests, and sometimes a firearm is needed to affect that arrest. Whenever I hear someone say “coolege police don’t need guns” I ask them what weapons they’re issued by the police department they work for. Then I get “well…um…I’m not a cop”. Then shut up, you don’t know what you’re talking about. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 5:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/30 "2006-01-03T05:08:06Z")

</div>

> [@SaintCad](#):
>
> The federal gun permit is not open to private citizens. It is documentation that a certain person is legally allowed to CCW in plainclothes. It is to avoid issues where a person may not know that a Treasury Agent (for example) is allow to carry weapons. I’ve seen a couple of these since I know a few people that are allowed to CCW for their federal jobs.

Whoops. I posted before seeing this post. This is not a **permit** at all, as you implied in your previous post. It is simply documentation that one is a peace officer with the status to carry a weapon. Almost every department I know of has this, including my own. It’s usually typed on department letter head., in form.

You had implied previously that there was a “permit”, which this obviously isn’t.

Either way, I’m not certain POTUS is eligible for this. But that goes back to the OP doesn’t it? We’re back to square one! ☹

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 6:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/31 "2006-01-03T06:51:18Z")

</div>

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> **THAT** is their legal address as of the 2004 tax year, and they are therefore legally bound by the laws applied to citizens of Illinois. 🙂

Think of it this way: by the standard set in your post my Fadder-in-law can legally carry a concealed weapon when he visits here in Wisconsin because he is a resident of Florida & is legally bound to their laws which allows him to CCW with their permit.

Nope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robert\_Emmett](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b487fb/32.png) [@Robert\_Emmett](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robert_Emmett)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 7:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/32 "2006-01-03T07:02:12Z")

</div>

> [@AskNott](#):
>
> As a commander in chief, he is a member of the military. He can carry whatever he pleases, and the Department of Defense will back him up. Why is there any confusion over this?

Actually, the President is considered a civilian IIRC. Not a member of the military.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 12:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/33 "2006-01-03T12:36:16Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Whoops. I posted before seeing this post. This is not a **permit** at all, as you implied in your previous post. It is simply documentation that one is a peace officer with the status to carry a weapon. Almost every department I know of has this, including my own. It’s usually typed on department letter head., in form.
> 
> You had implied previously that there was a “permit”, which this obviously isn’t.
> 
> Either way, I’m not certain POTUS is eligible for this. But that goes back to the OP doesn’t it? We’re back to square one! ☹

When it was shown to me the first time, the person called it a federal gun permit. It may be a misnomer, but that’s what I knew it as.  
Also, my post was in reply to a couple of people who believed that the President carrying a gun would fall under state or local laws. The point was IF he were allowed to carry a gun, it would be under federal jurisdiction - not local.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pravnik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/8edcca/32.png) [@pravnik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pravnik)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/34 "2006-01-03T17:14:23Z")

</div>

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> Perhaps we can not take everything said by a Doper attorney as legal gospel, if no cite is provided? Yes. That might be best. We all do have the same Internet access.
> 
> George W. Bush and Laura Bush must legally declare their place of residence on their US 1040 Tax Form, just like everybody else has to. ( No doubt it is against the law to make up a place of residence that is not in fact your legal one and list it on your 1040 Form. )
> 
> According to a photocopy of the [actual 2004 Tax Return Filed By George W. Bush and Laura Bush](http://www.taxhistory.org/thp/thpwebsite.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument), their legal residence is as follows:
> 
> Northern Trust Co. PO Box 803938 Chicago, IL. 60680
> 
> **THAT** is their legal address as of the 2004 tax year, and they are therefore legally bound by the laws applied to citizens of Illinois.

Actually, that’s the post office box of the trust company and trust officer that signs the President and First Lady’s income tax returns under a power of attorney. As far as I am aware, they are still domiciled in Texas, where there’s no state income tax.

That brings up something else; domicile is different from residence. Your domicile, sometimes called “legal residence,” is your permanent address, the physical location that you intend to return to. A residence, sometimes called “physical residence,” is any place that you reside. You can only claim one domicile at any given time, but you can have many residences. Regardless of his domicile, the President undeniably keeps a residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in D.C.

Not that that matters for purposes of the discussion; as stated, I can’t go to D.C. and claim a Texas CCW lets me carry a gun there. Of course, I’m not the most powerful man in the world, and I can’t issue Executive Orders that carry the weight of federal law, unlike the President. If the President wants to carry a weapon, who the heck’s going to stop him?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elfkin477](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/a9a28c/32.png) [@elfkin477](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elfkin477)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/35 "2006-01-03T17:46:37Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> As a private citizen and resident of DC, Mr. Bush can’t carry or possess a handgun.

Not even with a gun permit?! Isn’t that unconstitutional?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Si\_Amigo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/si_amigo/32/2877_2.png) [@Si\_Amigo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Si_Amigo)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 6:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/36 "2006-01-03T18:14:46Z")

</div>

There is precedence for a Vice President to carry a weapon in the US Senate.  
[Martin Van Beuren](http://www.usatrivia.com/pasnatt.html)

Did he lose that privalege once he became a President?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 6:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/37 "2006-01-03T18:40:52Z")

</div>

> [@elfkin477](#):
>
> Not even with a gun permit?! Isn’t that unconstitutional?

Sadly, no. Although I believe the constitution SHOULD be interpreted to prevent the wholesale ban of handguns, in fact, current precedent permits this. The right to bear arms is a collective right, not an individual right. That’s unwise, in my view, but it is the law of the land.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alterego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/6bbea6/32.png) [@alterego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alterego)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 7:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/38 "2006-01-03T19:20:28Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> The point was IF he were allowed to carry a gun, it would be under federal jurisdiction - not local.

There is no reason a federal official cannot be authorized both by federal and state/local laws to carry a weapon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 7:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/39 "2006-01-03T19:23:24Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> The right to bear arms is a collective right, not an individual right. That’s unwise, in my view, but it is the law of the land.

Not according to John Ashcroft who indicated, while U.S. Attorney General, that it is an individual right.

The “collective right” thing flies in the face of history and statements our founders made when the 2nd Amendment was being written/debated. There were actually a few versions of it.

But beyond that, most state constitutions are clear that it is an individual right. D.C. has none as far as I know.

Not sure how any of this applies the the POTUS though, or the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2006, 7:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105/40 "2006-01-03T19:44:49Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Yeah. Believe it or not there are some police departments where officers don’t carry firearms

I am also led to believe that there are law enforcement agencies that permit their officers to be armed only while they are on duty and prohibit them from carrying a firearm when they are off duty. I should think that this also factors into the equation.

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> It actually doesn’t mean jack shit where a public servant lives while they are serving the public. If I am stationed in Iraq for 2 years, I am not barred from voting in a Presidential election because I’m living in Iraq- and what- suddenly I’m a citizen of Iraq? Sorry. Doesn’t work that way at all.

You might not be a citizen of Iraq, but you had damn better obey the laws of Iraq, whoever is setting them these days.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-the-us-president-carry-a-weapon/338105.md?page=3)
