# Can W be impeached for something that is illegal but has public support?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-w-be-impeached-for-something-that-is-illegal-but-has-public-support/342118>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 29, 2006, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-w-be-impeached-for-something-that-is-illegal-but-has-public-support/342118 "2006-01-29T21:50:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2006, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-w-be-impeached-for-something-that-is-illegal-but-has-public-support/342118/41 "2006-02-01T22:48:45Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> No, **Martin.** I, for one, have yet to see or hear a coherent argument that FISA is unconstitutional – on this board or anywhere else. And not for lack of searching, either. Perhaps you would care to present one?

No one’s stepped up to the plate, so I’ve started a separate thread on the constitutionality of FISA: [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=356805](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=356805)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-w-be-impeached-for-something-that-is-illegal-but-has-public-support/342118.md?page=2)