# Can we consider allowing direct image uploads?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-consider-allowing-direct-image-uploads/1013213>\
**Category:** Site Feedback\
**Created:** [January 21, 2025, 3:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-consider-allowing-direct-image-uploads/1013213 "2025-01-21T15:40:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [January 21, 2025, 6:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-consider-allowing-direct-image-uploads/1013213/15 "2025-01-21T18:28:44Z")

</div>

> [@Reply](#):
>
> I presume the Powers That Be would also be disinterested in paid membership tiers that could actually generate revenue…? Just not enough revenue vs the hassle it’d take to set up?

A previous thread on this topic:

> [@Is it now possible to pay to subscribe to the SDMB?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/is-it-now-possible-to-pay-to-subscribe-to-the-sdmb/984521):
>
> Before we switched to the New Board\*, it was possible (and encouraged) to pay an annual subscription amount to the Board. I don’t think it came with any special privileges, but I like to support a thing that I use every day and value as much as I do The Dope… so has the subscription function been reinstated? I’ve seen references to such in a few threads, but I’m not sure if the references were ironic. There’s a lot of irony in this community, I’ve noticed. The subject came up a few times when …

To summarize, the option (that we had on the old board software) is pending indefinitely.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-consider-allowing-direct-image-uploads/1013213)._
