# Can we have a special no-hijack rule for lekatt?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-have-a-special-no-hijack-rule-for-lekatt/545243
**Category:** About This Message Board
**Created:** [July 1, 2010, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-have-a-special-no-hijack-rule-for-lekatt/545243 "2010-07-01T22:05:44Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lord\_Ashtar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ea924/32.png) [@Lord\_Ashtar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Ashtar)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2010, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-have-a-special-no-hijack-rule-for-lekatt/545243/2 "2010-07-01T22:37:00Z")

</div>

I think it’s under control.

> [@Believers: Why are you so sure of your beliefs?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/believers-why-are-you-so-sure-of-your-beliefs/543965/203):
>
> This is a direct violation of the instructions you have received to refrain from pointing to your blog, particularly when claiming to be addressing scientific issues, when your blog page provides neither science nor links to scientific papers on the topic.
> 
> You are again Warned that your behavior is inappropriate.
> 
> [/Moderating]

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-have-a-special-no-hijack-rule-for-lekatt/545243)._