Okay, here’s a rant.
It’s recruitment and application season. We get over 100 applicants to our program, and there are about 50 applicants to the doctoral program - so there are tons of inquiries. One prospective student sent an email asking for names of students to contact about life in the program. Okay, no problem - we have student volunteers who are a rapid response team for this purpose. I notice a semi-rant about how important it is to have caring professors who cater to different learning styles, but whatever.
I get a follow up email from the student asking how intently do profs learn students’ learning styles, if they adapt their syllabi to student interests, and how tragic it is when profs teach how they want to teach without regard to student learning modalities.
Seriously?
This is a highly ranked, rigorous research program. While all of my colleagues are nice people and care about students, it’s highly unlikely that they are going to change syllabi based on student personality types. The syllabi are created from years of experience and research and serves to teach and inform students of content and theoretical knowledge. Some profs lecture. Others have students lead conversations… and everything in between. We even have a prof who “flips” the classroom, which is all the range in college pedagogy now. Guess what? Some students hate that teaching style. Part of graduate school is being adaptive - some profs are student centered and modern, others are old school and lecture. You, the grad student, have to adapt to the styles - and that’s what we’re looking for. Telling us you’re a special flower is a huge red flag that our pace and philosophy probably isn’t a good fit for you.
Hell, are any graduate programs like that? Our faculty conduct research and work in the field. I can’t see them taking precious time to rework a syllabus to fit a particular student’s learning style.
Now all of the faculty make tweaks and changes to classes - it’s natural to bring new content or change things that don’t work, or employ some cool new technology. And of course we are legally required to provide accommodations to students with disabilities - no problem. But I thought this was an ill-advised email that makes the applicant stand out - and not in a good way.