# Can we link to our own tweets or other social media?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [January 12, 2020, 2:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290 "2020-01-12T02:16:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/41 "2020-01-14T15:04:44Z")

</div>

I’d prefer posters copy and paste rather than link, but there’s problems with doing that.

If someone does copy-and-paste their own writing from another site, it’s probably a good idea to note that it’s been copied from elsewhere and that it is one’s own. Otherwise, there might be an accusation of a copyright violation.

And, by posting here, it gives some rights to what was posted to the owners of this board. Some posters might not be comfortable with that.

I think best practice is to write a summary here of what was written elsewhere, while linking to the original. No different than referring to another person’s writing on another site.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 3:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/42 "2020-01-14T15:33:07Z")

</div>

> [@hajario](#):
>
> How about let’s try it? If it ends up not working out, stop allowing it and write it off as a failed experiment (like the link to digg on the bottom of every thread which is broken by the way). My prediction is that people linking to their Twitter accounts or whatever will be rare to the point of insignificant.

I suspect you’re right.

My impression is that, under the rules as they currently exist, “linking to our own tweets or other social media” is not prohibited unless it involves doing something else against the rules, like spamming or linking to NSFW material. But neither is it _explicitly_ permitted—it’s just not really mentioned at all. So the first question is, is my impression correct?

Then the second question is, should the rules be changed, either to explicitly prohibit this or to explicitly permit it? At this point, I don’t think either of those is necessary, though it could conceivably become necessary at some point.

And the third question is, regardless of the rules or lack thereof, is it a good idea for people to actually do this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 4:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/43 "2020-01-14T16:34:05Z")

</div>

> [@dalej42](#):
>
> I’m very active on Twitter and Instagram.
> 
> Can I link to my own posts on social media in response to a thread?
> 
> For example:  
> OP: What did you think of this movie?  
> Dalej42: I thought it sucked \<link to my twitter rant about how much I hated that film\>  
> OP: How bad is the snow where you are?  
> Dalej42: Well, don’t let a chihuahua out in my neighborhood \<link to my Instagram showing massive snow mounds\>
> 
> I don’t want to be accused of self promoting my own social media, but sometimes it’s just easier to give a link.

> [@TubaDiva](#):
>
> In discussion now, we’ll get back to you.
> 
> Jenny  
> your humble TubaDiva  
> Administrator

Lol, wut? I’ve been doing this for years now. This is even a question? In 2020?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/44 "2020-01-14T16:41:01Z")

</div>

n/m

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 4:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/45 "2020-01-14T16:41:49Z")

</div>

> [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](#):
>
> …treat it like any other link, where they quote enough of the link to make their point…

Yup. I thought the rule (or etiquette, if not a formal rule) was that at least a brief synopsis should accompany any link, so that conversation can flow coherently without any _obligation_ to follow the link. Many links, especially on social media, just won’t work after a period of time, so if we don’t do this, it will be impossible to make sense of old threads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JohnT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johnt/32/15048_2.png) [@JohnT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JohnT)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/46 "2020-01-14T16:48:02Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> Some people here are acting like they’re going to be forced to click on click on various links. Good lord, is it any different than if someone linked to their personal blog, or live journal?  
> People give dubious sources all the time, but somehow, Twitter is the devil. Get over yourselves.
> 
> Do you want this place to attract new members, or do you want it to die, make up your freaking minds.

People are still debating whether the SDMB is social media, so, yeah.

Guess I’m going to stop linking to SDMB threads in my conversations with the Editor of Buzzfeedworld, Hayes Brown ([https://twitter.com/JohnT15/status/1077730047912566784?s=20](https://twitter.com/JohnT15/status/1077730047912566784?s=20)), former WaPo (now Slate) writer Ashley Feinberg ([https://twitter.com/JohnT15/status/1077730047912566784?s=20](https://twitter.com/JohnT15/status/1077730047912566784?s=20)), comedian Matt Oswalt ([https://twitter.com/JohnT15/status/1016071683386601472?s=20](https://twitter.com/JohnT15/status/1016071683386601472?s=20)) and dozens of others because, God forbid, I should take them from Twitter. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knowed\_Out](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/knowed_out/32/7380_2.png) [@Knowed\_Out](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knowed_Out)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/47 "2020-01-14T20:19:39Z")

</div>

The reason I don’t favor Twitlinks is not because of board performance or whatever. It’s because the Twitlinker is usually lazy and provides no context. The link will go to a long list of crap that may or may not be germane to the OP, and I don’t want to flounder in Twit limbo looking for the salient point. Plus, I’m normally averse to click bait, because I’m usually directed to some lameassed shit that doesn’t measure up to its headline. I refuse to justify the link by increasing the hit count. At least at this board, I’m secure in the knowledge that somebody expended some kind of effort into keeping their thoughts contained in one single post. I’m not impressed by how much I’m redirected over the internets.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Atamasama](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/atamasama/32/12961_2.png) [@Atamasama](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Atamasama)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 9:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/48 "2020-01-14T21:02:00Z")

</div>

> [@Knowed\_Out](#):
>
> The reason I don’t favor Twitlinks is not because of board performance or whatever. It’s because the Twitlinker is usually lazy and provides no context. The link will go to a long list of crap that may or may not be germane to the OP, and I don’t want to flounder in Twit limbo looking for the salient point. Plus, I’m normally averse to click bait, because I’m usually directed to some lameassed shit that doesn’t measure up to its headline. I refuse to justify the link by increasing the hit count. At least at this board, I’m secure in the knowledge that somebody expended some kind of effort into keeping their thoughts contained in one single post. I’m not impressed by how much I’m redirected over the internets.

Yup.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeardOfBees](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/c67d28/32.png) [@BeardOfBees](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BeardOfBees)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/49 "2020-01-14T21:28:57Z")

</div>

Are we allowed to access this site through wi-fi, or do we have to use dial-up?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/50 "2020-01-14T22:00:26Z")

</div>

> [@BeardOfBees](#):
>
> Are we allowed to access this site through wi-fi, or do we have to use dial-up?

Well, first you dial in to Compuserve…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Omar\_Little](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omar_little/32/269_2.png) [@Omar\_Little](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omar_Little)\
**Post date:** [January 14, 2020, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/51 "2020-01-14T22:16:46Z")

</div>

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/gsNaR6FRuO0/hqdefault.jpg "The Sound of dial-up Internet") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gsNaR6FRuO0)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MEBuckner](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mebuckner/32/2896_2.png) [@MEBuckner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MEBuckner)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/52 "2020-01-15T00:51:59Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> Well, first you dial in to Compuserve…

If you were a True Doper you’d know that it’s “first you dial in to AOL”!

> [@](#):
>
> [_The Chicago Reader_, June 27, 1996](https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/the-straight-dope/Content?oid=890864):  
> YOWSAH! THE STRAIGHT DOPE IS NOW ON-LINE!
> 
> If you thought the on-line thing was hot before, wait till you get a load of this: the Straight Dope is now on America Online.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hajario](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hajario/32/171_2.png) [@hajario](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hajario)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/53 "2020-01-15T00:55:44Z")

</div>

It’s amazing how ahead of the curve they were in the 90’s and then it just…stopped. The aversion to things like simple avatars and allowing the message board to be found with search engines was astounding.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Helena330](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/helena330/32/531_2.png) [@Helena330](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Helena330)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 7:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/54 "2020-01-15T07:42:22Z")

</div>

Youtube is social media so people would have to stop posting links leading there, too.

I’ll bet everyone in this thread has clicked on a youtube link. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 9:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/55 "2020-01-15T09:57:34Z")

</div>

> [@TubaDiva](#):
>
> Because we want our users to discuss and debate stuff here and not take it off to some other site.

And that is exactly the logic that I say doesn’t work. inking something is how you get people discuss it here. If you don’t link it, then it can’t be discussed here. It would have to be discussed there.

If linking offsite led to fewer posts, then Reddit would be dead. Yet it is a site that has replaced nearly all other forums. Being able to link your content encourages people to share their stuff, and people like to share.

It’s also never been a significant problem before, despite not being against the rules before. Assuming it will be a problem in the future when you have no evidence seems, well, irrational to me. You don’t make rules about something that isn’t a problem.

I also note that, since pictures were brought up in the OP, there is no way to post one’s images on this board. So you have just forbidden discussing any image a poster has made.

To make explicit what I normally leave implicit: I invite you to reply and tell me why I’m wrong. Because, right now, it seems the logic is all backwards and would actually reduce the amount of participation here, rather than increase it.

The previous rule seems better–we’ll allow it, but we reserve the right to ask you to stop if it becomes too much. Or, if you want to look at Reddit, you have the “only 10% of links can be to your own content,” which seems to be working well enough for them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 10:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/56 "2020-01-15T10:59:37Z")

</div>

> [@Knowed\_Out](#):
>
> The reason I don’t favor Twitlinks is not because of board performance or whatever. It’s because the Twitlinker is usually lazy and provides no context. The link will go to a long list of crap that may or may not be germane to the OP, and I don’t want to flounder in Twit limbo looking for the salient point. Plus, I’m normally averse to click bait, because I’m usually directed to some lameassed shit that doesn’t measure up to its headline. I refuse to justify the link by increasing the hit count. At least at this board, I’m secure in the knowledge that somebody expended some kind of effort into keeping their thoughts contained in one single post. I’m not impressed by how much I’m redirected over the internets.

First, I appreciate “Twitlinks.” I mean, it’s stupid and unoriginal, but it does a great job of capturing the vibe of retirement community members staring balefully at the teens across the street.

I don’t know what “Twit limbo” is, but if anyone links to something incoherent (On twitter or anywhere else), you can call them out on it and request clarification, just like you do when someone posts something long and incoherent directly on this board.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 11:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/57 "2020-01-15T11:54:36Z")

</div>

I ain’t in no retirement community and I agree that Twitter links almost universally suck. Half the time it’s just a link to something else in the tweet, the rest of the time it’s a context free one sentence story. It’s only occasionally good when you want that sentence from the horse’s mouth. The rest of the time, it’s a lame lazy cite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Thudlow\_Boink](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thudlow_boink/32/320_2.png) [@Thudlow\_Boink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Thudlow_Boink)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/58 "2020-01-15T13:25:35Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> And that is exactly the logic that I say doesn’t work. inking something is how you get people discuss it here. If you don’t link it, then it can’t be discussed here.

Sure it can, if instead of linking it, you just **post it here** , so we can see what you have to say without clicking a link! Remember, we’re talking about linking to _your own posts_ elsewhere.

I get the impression that different people in this thread are imagining or thinking about different things, and thus arguing at cross purposes with one another.

Here are the OP’s examples:

> [@dalej42](#):
>
> OP: What did you think of this movie?  
> Dalej42: I thought it sucked \<link to my twitter rant about how much I hated that film\>

And what people are saying is: Instead of this, why not just post that rant here? That way people don’t have to click a link to see it, and deal with a different interface that they may or may not be familiar with.

(That said, I don’t see anything wrong with posting the link, as long as you clearly identify what/where it links to and you accept that not everyone’s going to click it.)

> [@](#):
>
> OP: How bad is the snow where you are?  
> Dalej42: Well, don’t let a chihuahua out in my neighborhood \<link to my Instagram showing massive snow mounds\>

People have always posted links to photos elsewhere and linked to them here. It’s how we “share” images here, and there’s plenty of precedent. The only problem is if you link to a site that doesn’t work for all Dopers (you have to log in or sign up or use a specific app or something like that to see the images).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Larry\_Borgia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/larry_borgia/32/156_2.png) [@Larry\_Borgia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Larry_Borgia)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 1:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/59 "2020-01-15T13:40:41Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> I ain’t in no retirement community and I agree that Twitter links almost universally suck. Half the time it’s just a link to something else in the tweet, the rest of the time it’s a context free one sentence story. It’s only occasionally good when you want that sentence from the horse’s mouth. The rest of the time, it’s a lame lazy cite.

That’s fine. You don’t have to like them. The question is whether they should be forbidden. If they’re not forbidden, I suspect people posting to their own account’s will be very rare. People already post to other people’s twitter accounts, if only, like you said, to show that some famous person actually said the thing the poster says they said.

I can’t imagine why anyone would link to their own account, I just don’t see why they should be forbidden from doing so.

And again, this board does not host images, so anyone who wants to link to a picture has to link offsite anyway. People seem to like cat pics. Why not let people link to an Instagram picture of their new kitty? If you don’t want to see the cat, you don’t have to click.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2020, 2:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290/60 "2020-01-15T14:03:47Z")

</div>

SlackInc used to link to his own twitter all the time. It often felt like he was trying to gain followers to me.

I don’t think it should be forbidden but I am pretty sick of:

Doper: They just shut down the investigation! \<link\>  
–\> content at link “They shut down the investigation! \<link to BBC\>”, by some guy I never heard of.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-link-to-our-own-tweets-or-other-social-media/846290.md?page=4)
