# Can we talk about acupuncture?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 24, 2007, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173 "2007-06-24T00:46:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2007, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/41 "2007-06-27T16:31:30Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Renee]  
Again, I’m sure this will be dismissed by those of you who belive that unless it involves a large sample size and a control group it didn’t happen, but there it is anyway.  
[/QUOTE]  
I believe that the guy got a dire diagnosis, that your dad came in and did what he did, and that the guy is now up and around. But who knows if what he did was the cause; I’ve seen enough medical shows when unexplainable recoveries happened under Western medical only.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Musicat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/musicat/32/20189_2.png) [@Musicat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Musicat)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2007, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/42 "2007-06-27T21:55:14Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Renee]  
This thread is really disappointing me.  
[/quote]  
Sorry to hear that. ☹ It does seem like we are on topic, and talking about acupuncture as the OP said. Are you disappointed because your beliefs have been questioned?

> [@](#):
>
> **WhyNot** is a longstanding and well-respected member of this community and I’m appalled that a few of you are basically calling her a liar.

Liar? No, I believe she is reporting what she saw as well as she can. What we are questioning is her interpretation of events. [If A happens after B, does B cause A?](http://skepdic.com/adhoc.html) Is her evidence sufficent to overturn a very large body of medical knowledge that has been well documented? I think not.

> [@](#):
>
> She is only reporting her personal experience, and has said that sometimes acupuncture does not seem to work. In her, and my, experience, sometimes it does have dramatic positive effects, though.

I would like to gently suggest you investigate the logic behind those statements. You have said that it does work, but not always – any possibility that the outcomes are merely random? (cf. [regressive fallacy](http://skepdic.com/regressive.html)) You are assuming that personal experience counts as valid evidence in the scientific community. [It does not.](http://skepdic.com/testimon.html)

> [@](#):
>
> It clearly is not well-understood, but I think that there is enough anecdotal evidence to suggest that sometimes acupuncture is very helpful, even if it isn’t always.

I say again: anecdotal evidence counts for nothing. And it does not improve with quantity. If each piece of evidence is worthless, accumulating hundreds of them does not make any of them more valid. Quantity can not substitute for quality.

> [@](#):
>
> Can we open our minds just a crack, people? Consider that maybe western medicine doesn’t know absolutely everything?

That’s pretty much the mantra of believers, and I’ll respond with a counter-mantra: An open mind is desirable, but not one so open that your brains fall out. Intelligent questioning is good, but blind belief is not the same thing as an open mind. In fact, it’s just the opposite. And belief in the face of contradictory evidence is just plain stupid.

One who intends to practice critical thinking needs to assign a value to each piece of evidence. Some things carry more weight than others; a small volume of peer-reviewed, repeatable experiments counts more than a large volume of folk tales and urban legends that cannot be verified.

Western medicine doesn’t know everything, but traditional Chinese medicine knows nothing. You might find it interesting that even the Chinese don’t use it much: [“The National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) claims that of the 46 medical journals published by the Chinese Medical Association, **not one** is devoted to acupuncture or other traditional Chinese medical practices.”](http://skepdic.com/acupunc.html)(my bold)

> [@](#):
>
> I’m sure you aren’t going to believe this either, but my dad (the chiropractor/acupuncturist–double evil!) has a patient who’s family has been coming to him for many years. Their son was in a car accident when he was 18. It was really bad, and the doctors wanted to take him off life support and let him die. The parents called my dad, who did whatever he does on him, including acupuncture, and now, several years later, the guy has a wife and kid. He has some brain damage and a limp, but he isn’t dead like the western doctors said he would be. They remain close friends of my family.
> 
> I was in my teens and not on good terms with my dad when all of this happened (he’s not a saint and mostly drives me crazy, but he’s a very good chiropractor), so I don’t know the details of the treatment, but it did happen. And no, it isn’t in medical journals because that isn’t what my dad does. He’s not a scientist or a writer or a researcher. He does what he can to help people, and he refers people that he can’t help to surgeons. But sometimes these alternative medicines work when western medicine doesn’t. Again, I’m sure this will be dismissed by those of you who belive that unless it involves a large sample size and a control group it didn’t happen, but there it is anyway.

It’s not that I don’t believe the story you tell us, it’s that you may be drawing unsupported conclusions. The reason sample size and control groups are mandatory is **without them, we don’t know what factor(s) were involved and cannot be sure just what we are trying to prove.**

I’m sure I can find (or make up) impressive testimonial or observational evidence to prove almost anything you can dream up. The problem is, it’s not _ **good** _ evidence. Science struggles mightily to separate the good evidence from the bad. Good evidence is what brought us the knowledge, cures and preventions we have today for such scourges as smallpox. It’s what has increased our life expectancy substantually over the last few centuries. Acupuncture and the hairbrained theory behind it has done none of this. It’s time to discard irrational beliefs and concentrate on actually learning how things work and how to improve them, not fantasize over ideas that have been shown to be worthless.

On the other hand, if you want to stick needles in yourself, go nuts. I hope it makes you happy. 🙂 But if you get sick, I hope you visit a real doctor, and take advantage of what science has learned so far. The odds of you improving are vastly better.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2007, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/43 "2007-06-27T22:08:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Musicat]  
You might find it interesting that even the Chinese don’t use it much: [“The National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) claims that of the 46 medical journals published by the Chinese Medical Association, **not one** is devoted to acupuncture or other traditional Chinese medical practices.”](http://skepdic.com/acupunc.html)(my bold)  
[/QUOTE]

To say that the Chinese don’t use acupuncture much is just so incredibly out of left field I don’t know how to address it. They may not write about it in medical journals (for many of the reasons I mentioned in my previous post, plus the anti-traditional pro-Western bias of their media post Cultural Revolution), but they use it very much, even within their Western style hospitals. Your cite doesn’t even say they don’t use it - you’re extrapolating that out of the fact that the government doesn’t publish journals on it. Frankly, I’m not sure why they would - the Chinese consider this all figured out hundreds of years ago, so why would they publish old discoveries?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Musicat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/musicat/32/20189_2.png) [@Musicat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Musicat)\
**Post date:** [June 27, 2007, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/44 "2007-06-27T22:28:52Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=WhyNot]  
To say that the Chinese don’t use acupuncture much is just so incredibly out of left field I don’t know how to address it. They may not write about it in medical journals (for many of the reasons I mentioned in my previous post, plus the anti-traditional pro-Western bias of their media post Cultural Revolution), but they use it very much, even within their Western style hospitals. Your cite doesn’t even say they don’t use it - you’re extrapolating that out of the fact that the government doesn’t publish journals on it. Frankly, I’m not sure why they would - the Chinese consider this all figured out hundreds of years ago, so why would they publish old discoveries?  
[/QUOTE]  
Western medicine figured out centuries ago that [asepis](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asepsis) is a good thing. So why do they write [new articles](http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=asepsis) about it?

It’s an odd science that doesn’t add to its body of knowledge by new observations, experiments, speculations, and tests. In fact, it’s not science at all. Very few scientific “facts” or laws have survived, unaltered and unchallenged, for 4000 years.

The quote I gave was a secondary quote by Bob Carroll of a NCAHF claim that medical publications in China ignore “traditional” Chinese medicine and respect western medicine much more. It was intended to contrast the larger interest in the West with the non-interest in the East. If true, it seems odd that the originating culture no longer puts much stock in the theory.

Yes, I’d say the lack of publication on a topic compared to prolific publication on an opposing topic _does_ mean something, unless you are claiming that the Chinese gummit is suppressing a large body of work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Waenara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/50afbb/32.png) [@Waenara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Waenara)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 1:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/45 "2007-06-28T01:02:39Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=WhyNot]  
But I think it does illustrate a huge part of the reason why acupuncture and other alternative modalities aren’t more widely accepted and don’t have large studies backing them up - most acupuncturists aren’t interested in being writers or researchers. Those that are tend to be (not exclusively, but tend to be) Western docs who are looking at acupuncture in a mechanical sense, divorcing it from it’s traditional diagnostic framework.

“We” say: I’ve personally had some really interesting results and “they” say: We don’t believe you unless you’ve been published and “We” say: sorry, I have clients to treat, no time to write and that’s where it ends. Lines are drawn and neither side will budge or accept the other’s methods of proof. There is no significant Academia in the acupuncture world as there is in the medical world. People don’t go to acupuncture school to become researchers. The go to become acupuncturists.  
[/QUOTE]  
Personally, I think that any health care provider should be interested in whether or not their treatment can be proven to be effective. Sure, not all acupuncturists are interested in personally conducting research - but neither are all doctors, only some go into research. But if we never did controlled, double-blind, randomized studies then we’d have no way to be able to tell which treatments actually _work_.

If acupuncturists as a whole are convinced that their treatment is truly effective then why on earth wouldn’t they be interested in actually proving this?

It reminds of an argument I had with my sister last year regarding another alternative health treatment (chiropractors). She did the whole “research isn’t important - helping the individual is important” schtick. She also seems to think that everyone can be helped by chiropractic - not just those who are currently “sick”, but also those who are generally healthy, in order to maintain their health.

To which I said that the majority of people do not use any given alternative medical therapy (acupuncture, chiropractors, naturopaths, etc…). BUT, if these treatments were actually proven to be beneficial, then I’m sure many more people would seek out these services.

Basically, if you’re a supporter of \<insert alternative therapy here\>, then the best thing that could happen to encourage people to use said therapy would to have good evidence that your treatment is effective and not a waste of money.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mswas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@mswas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mswas)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/46 "2007-06-28T01:15:49Z")

</div>

This is the best book to introduce someone to Traditional Chinese Medicine, specifically acupuncture.

[Between Heaven and Earth](http://www.amazon.com/Between-Heaven-Earth-Harriet-Beinfield/dp/0345379748/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/105-5627928-1456427?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1182993246&sr=8-1)  
by Harriet Beinfield, and Efrem Korn.

Basically Western Medicine treats pathologies like a mechanic. Eastern Medicine addresses the whole system. I get acupuncture every week. They offered me a treatment to cure me of my addiction to pot, I took it on a lark, and it actually hurt my lungs to smoke pot after.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mswas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/e99b99/32.png) [@mswas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mswas)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 1:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/47 "2007-06-28T01:36:55Z")

</div>

I think that one of the benefits of the rise of China will be the entry of Traditional Chinese Medicine into the body of researched literature. A good friend of mine at John’s Hopkins doing his premed was involved in a study about the benefits of Meditation on AIDS patients. It’s coming up, I think a lot of the research will be done by the next generation.

I’ve been thinking about my next step for schooling, maybe I’ll just go pre-med and then get my Masters degree in Acupuncture so I can give a gift to the **Musicat’s** of the world. I’m sorry **Musicat** , even if I do straight schooling from her til the end, I wouldn’t be done with all that for another 5 years minimum and then who knows how long the research would take. 😉

I look forward to some interesting research. One Empirical test that I have seen proven on myself is my Shiatsu teacher has this little device, some kind of piezzoelectric stimulator that if he puts it on one end of a meridian and places his finger at the other end of the meridian you’ll feel the shock travel up the meridian. Since meridians do not correspond to nerves it can’t be simply travelling up the nerve. If you place the ground finger on some other place on the body you’ll feel the shock but not as intensely. -shrugs- I don’t know how to prove it, but I’ve experienced it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 2:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/48 "2007-06-28T02:03:06Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Waenara]  
To which I said that the majority of people do not use any given alternative medical therapy (acupuncture, chiropractors, naturopaths, etc…). BUT, if these treatments were actually proven to be beneficial, then I’m sure many more people would seek out these services.

Basically, if you’re a supporter of \<insert alternative therapy here\>, then the best thing that could happen to encourage people to use said therapy would to have good evidence that your treatment is effective and not a waste of money.  
[/QUOTE]

Which would be nice, except that, as I said, there isn’t anyone paying the acupuncturists not to see patients to have the time and financial freedom do many studies. Most acupuncturists I know aren’t independently wealthy and can’t afford to fund their own studies, nor do they have the education in research methods and protocol to really do a good job at it. As I said, this is slowly changing as established health care centers begin to fund acupuncture studies (and chiropractic and herbal and other alternative modalities), but it’s not going to change overnight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haunted](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/898d66/32.png) [@Haunted](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haunted)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/49 "2007-06-28T02:25:46Z")

</div>

If someone was looking for evidence that acupuncture works, I would direct them to post #2 of this thread. (Thanks, **BrainGlutton** , that was very helpful.) I think it provides an excellent summary of the latest information.

And thanks for the reading tip, **mswas**. Maybe I’ll pick that up. Sounds interesting.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rasa](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rasa/32/3578_2.png) [@Rasa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rasa)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/50 "2007-06-28T02:28:26Z")

</div>

Just as an aside, necrotizing fasciitis ! = necrotic tissue due to diabetes. IANAD, but diabetes does not cause the disease necrotizing fasciitis.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ravenman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ravenman/32/2929_2.png) [@Ravenman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ravenman)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 4:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/51 "2007-06-28T04:02:08Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Musicat]  
You are assuming that personal experience counts as valid evidence in the scientific community. [It does not.](http://skepdic.com/testimon.html)I say again: anecdotal evidence counts for nothing.  
[/quote]  
Except in IMHO, in which the OP asked for a poll of people offering him their experiences with acupuncture.

I think it’s in pretty poor taste to criticize people for offering their personal experiences when that is exactly what the OP asked for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 6:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/52 "2007-06-28T06:17:51Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=mswas]

Basically Western Medicine treats pathologies like a mechanic. Eastern Medicine addresses the whole system. .  
[/QUOTE]

Tell you what. We’ll each get infected with the Bubonic Plague. I will be does with nothing but a single antibiotic. You may use the entire spectrum of Eastern medicine. I will be cured rapidly, you will quite possibly die. Eastern medicine is an Oxymoron. It cures nothing. Not one single disease can be cured by Eastnern medicine. Oh sure, “ailments” can- “feeling bad” can- or jus about anything you can fool your body into beleiving it is cured. Black Pague, Scarlet fever, and uch like ravages the East for millenia until modern medicine came in. Not a single cure during those thousands of years- just dudes dying.

Or we’ll each have a finger cut off, and I get modern surgery to reattach, you get the entire panoply of Eastern Medicine.

Yeah, if you beleive in it, Eastern medicine can fix your dope problem. \*\*IF \*\*you beleive in it. But it can’t save your life or regrow your finger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 6:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/53 "2007-06-28T06:23:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=WhyNot]  
Which would be nice, except that, as I said, there isn’t anyone paying the acupuncturists not to see patients to have the time and financial freedom do many studies. Most acupuncturists I know aren’t independently wealthy and can’t afford to fund their own studies, nor do they have the education in research methods and protocol to really do a good job at it.  
[/QUOTE]

Your Accupunturist doesn’t have to do a “study” or pay a dime. He writes up a “case study”. That means you document that single case with photos and stuff. This would include testimony that the foot actually was necrotic, including results of blood tests (all of which were hopelfully already done by the MD), with “before and after” pictures. Trust me, any medical journal would love a out and out Lazerus type miracle like that. All for the cost of a few hours and a couple of digitital Photos. And since a study could save tens of thousands of feet from being amputated and thousands of lives- how could he\* not \*spend those few hours? :dubious:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 6:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/54 "2007-06-28T06:33:01Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DrDeth]  
Tell you what. We’ll each get infected with the Bubonic Plague. I will be does with nothing but a single antibiotic. You may use the entire spectrum of Eastern medicine. I will be cured rapidly, you will quite possibly die. Eastern medicine is an Oxymoron. It cures nothing. Not one single disease can be cured by Eastnern medicine. Oh sure, “ailments” can- “feeling bad” can- or jus about anything you can fool your body into beleiving it is cured. Black Pague, Scarlet fever, and uch like ravages the East for millenia until modern medicine came in. Not a single cure during those thousands of years- just dudes dying.

Or we’ll each have a finger cut off, and I get modern surgery to reattach, you get the entire panoply of Eastern Medicine.

Yeah, if you beleive in it, Eastern medicine can fix your dope problem. \*\*IF \*\*you beleive in it. But it can’t save your life or regrow your finger.  
[/QUOTE]

Why are you making it an either/or? There’s plenty of room for both. I’m with you all the way on the bubonic plague. And the fingertip replacement. And organ transplants and treatment of premature babies and general hygiene standards and blood transfusions and all the rest of the wonderful things Western Allopathic medicine has given us. Kudos and huzzah!

But there are a few things it sucks at: long term pain management. Allergies, recurrent migraines, obesity, asthma, low-level infertility and turning breech babies. Antibiotic resistant bacteria, antifungal resistant yeast infections, warts, many cases of dermatitis, eczema and psoriasis, depression and stress. Just so happens that acupuncture and other alternative modalities sometimes have success where Western modalities don’t. It’s actually kind of nice how one complements the other. So to speak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 6:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/55 "2007-06-28T06:34:45Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Haunted]  
Just because you think somebody is presenting misinformation is no excuse to do the same thing. Acupuncture does not cause necrotizing fasciitis. I realize you probably just made an error, because I think what you mean is that the use of needles sometimes leads to infection.

.  
[/QUOTE]

I cited three, count em THREE (and there were like 140 more but after a while it gets tedious)published studies that did in fact make that very claim- that in at least the single case under study- _Acupuncture caused necrotizing fasciitis_. Sure, it was the needle, but that is what accupuncture is mostly about- the needless and medically useless stabbing of dudes with needle- something that (suprise, suprise) leads to infections.

\*\*I \*\*made no error, all I did was quote from published studies which made that claim. You are free to rebut those _published, peer reviewed and cited studies_ if you care to. Please let us know how that works out. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Testy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/c37758/32.png) [@Testy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Testy)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 7:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/56 "2007-06-28T07:07:23Z")

</div>

OK, if you’re looking for personal experiences here’s one for you. I have cluster headaches, not life threatening but incredibly painful. Sometimes these get to happening too frequently and I’d do just about anything to get rid of them.

Four years ago my wife talked me into getting acupuncture for these. An ancient, smiling Chinese woman stuck me with needles in a variety of places over a three-week period.  
The results? My wallet was lighter and my headaches were completely unaffected. Neither the severity nor the frequency was reduced in the slightest degree. You know what was **really** infuriating? The ancient, smiling Chinese woman told me **it was my fault** because I didn’t believe in her treatment. Of course, that was BS as well. My wife was Asian (Thai) and tried acupuncture and a lot of other “traditional” medicines as well. She believed in this stuff but she still died from thymic tumors. In her case, Western medicine couldn’t cure her either but did extend her life. Asian/traditional medicine did nothing at all except keep the ancient Chinese woman smiling because she’d found yet another pair of suckers that would pay her for a completely useless treatment.

To quote some very learned person whose name I can’t remember; **"reality is what keeps on happening even if you don’t believe in it."**

Regards

Testy

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haunted](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/898d66/32.png) [@Haunted](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haunted)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 10:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/57 "2007-06-28T10:32:29Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=DrDeth]  
I cited three, count em THREE (and there were like 140 more but after a while it gets tedious)published studies that did in fact make that very claim- that in at least the single case under study- _Acupuncture caused necrotizing fasciitis_. Sure, it was the needle, but that is what accupuncture is mostly about- the needless and medically useless stabbing of dudes with needle- something that (suprise, suprise) leads to infections.

\*\*I \*\*made no error, all I did was quote from published studies which made that claim. You are free to rebut those _published, peer reviewed and cited studies_ if you care to. Please let us know how that works out. :rolleyes:  
[/QUOTE]

I’m not arguing with the studies. You’re misrepresenting the conclusion. Which is this:

> [@](#):
>
> Without proper preparation of skin and needle, transmission of systemic infection or local wound sepsis is possible.

To say that that means the same thing as “acupuncture causes necrotizing fasciitis” is simply incorrect.

Maybe you could cut and paste, from one of your cites, the sentence, “Acupuncture causes necrotizing fasciitis.” Even though you’re saying all you did was quote from the studies, I can’t find that sentence in any of them. Could you please tell me which study it’s from and what page it’s on?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Musicat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/musicat/32/20189_2.png) [@Musicat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Musicat)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 11:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/58 "2007-06-28T11:02:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Ravenman]  
Except in IMHO, in which the OP asked for a poll of people offering him their experiences with acupuncture.

I think it’s in pretty poor taste to criticize people for offering their personal experiences when that is exactly what the OP asked for.  
[/QUOTE]  
From the OP:

> [@](#):
>
> Also, does anyone know what the general feeling among western medicine practitioners is? The AMA? … Do you think it might just be all in your head? I’m curious.

And just what is the motto of the Straight Dope? “Spreading Ignorance”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haunted](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/898d66/32.png) [@Haunted](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haunted)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 11:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/59 "2007-06-28T11:06:08Z")

</div>

Medically useless?

Okay… am I the only one who read the other thread? Anybody who really wants to be informed on acupuncture should read it. The cites are all there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haunted](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/898d66/32.png) [@Haunted](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Haunted)\
**Post date:** [June 28, 2007, 11:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173/60 "2007-06-28T11:09:11Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> And just what is the motto of the Straight Dope? “Spreading Ignorance”?

Of course not, **Musicat**. It’s also not “Spreading Arrogance.”

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-we-talk-about-acupuncture/409173.md?page=4)
