# Can you be pulled over for NOT violating traffic laws?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606
**Category:** Factual Questions
**Created:** [December 19, 2007, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606 "2007-12-19T19:14:59Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Emilio\_Lizardo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Emilio\_Lizardo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Emilio_Lizardo)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 7:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/1 "2007-12-19T19:14:59Z")

</div>

[Story here.](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071217/ap_on_fe_st/odd_coffee_police) In a nutshell, police in a small town in California are pulling over motorists who are NOT violating traffic laws, and rewarding them with $5 Starbucks gift cards. I may start another thread on whether this is a good idea or not, but from a factual perspective, is this even legal? Could the recipient of one of these cards have a cause of action against the police department if the time lost to the encounter made them late for something important? What about infliction of distress, since most people get stressed out when the see flashing lights in their rearview mirrors?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bearflag70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8e7dd6/32.png) [@Bearflag70](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bearflag70)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 7:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/2 "2007-12-19T19:22:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Emilio Lizardo]  
[Story here.](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071217/ap_on_fe_st/odd_coffee_police) In a nutshell, police in a small town in California are pulling over motorists who are NOT violating traffic laws, and rewarding them with $5 Starbucks gift cards. I may start another thread on whether this is a good idea or not, but from a factual perspective, is this even legal? Could the recipient of one of these cards have a cause of action against the police department if the time lost to the encounter made them late for something important? What about infliction of distress, since most people get stressed out when the see flashing lights in their rearview mirrors?  
[/QUOTE]

Oh, brother. How stupid is that? :smack: I’m embarrassed that it’s in Rancho Cordova (next door to Sacramento). My reward for good driving should be to be left the fuck alone to go about my business. That, to me, is worth far more than your stupid coffee card.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bearflag70](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8e7dd6/32.png) [@Bearflag70](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bearflag70)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 7:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/3 "2007-12-19T19:26:40Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Bearflag70]  
Oh, brother. How stupid is that? :smack: I’m embarrassed that it’s in Rancho Cordova (next door to Sacramento). My reward for good driving should be to be left the fuck alone to go about my business. That, to me, is worth far more than your stupid coffee card.  
[/QUOTE]

OOps, I did not notice this is GQ. :smack: on me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/4 "2007-12-19T20:02:07Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Emilio Lizardo]  
[Story here.](http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071217/ap_on_fe_st/odd_coffee_police) In a nutshell, police in a small town in California are pulling over motorists who are NOT violating traffic laws, and rewarding them with $5 Starbucks gift cards. I may start another thread on whether this is a good idea or not, but from a factual perspective, is this even legal?  
[/QUOTE]

Well, it raises some legal issues.

> [@](#):
>
> Could the recipient of one of these cards have a cause of action against the police department if the time lost to the encounter made them late for something important? What about infliction of distress, since most people get stressed out when the see flashing lights in their rearview mirrors?

Unlikely, but the practices raise more serious issues:

1. What if you don’t stop?

2. What if you do, and they spot contraband or evidence of a crime?

> [@](#):
>
> An automobile stop is thus subject to the constitutional imperative that it not be “unreasonable” under the circumstances. As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where the police have probable cause to believe that a traffic violation has occurred. See Prouse, supra, at 659; Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 109 (1977) (per curiam).

[http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=517&invol=806](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=517&invol=806)

What they’re engaging in is a friendly, but perhaps misguided, unreasonable temporary seizure of you and your vehicle. If you stop and they see a severed head on your passenger seat, it’s a safe bet you’re getting arrested. Whether they can get the head into evidence will probably turn on the inevitable discovery doctrine. A severed head on a carseat is likely to be spotted; a roach in the ashtray, not so much.

What if you don’t stop, though. Does your flight alone give them grounds to stop you? \*Cf. \* _Illinois v. Wardlow_: [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=98-1036](http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=98-1036) (individually may ignore officer who lacks reasonable suspicion without creating reasonable suspicion, but individual’s unprovoked flight from police might generate reasonable suspicion).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![vibrotronica](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/a9a28c/32.png) [@vibrotronica](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/vibrotronica)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/5 "2007-12-19T20:32:56Z")

</div>

Yeah, that’s the whole point, isn’t it? See a car that you think is “suspicious” but you don’t have any probable cause to pull them over? Pull them over anyway, but claim it is to give them a gift card.

“You weren’t doing anything wrong. I was just pulling you over the give you a gift card. But I think I smell marijuana. Step out of the car.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yabob](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yabob/32/2821_2.png) [@yabob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yabob)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/6 "2007-12-19T20:39:58Z")

</div>

It’s not new. There’s been programs like this in past - I remember some jurisdiction handing out cards for free burgers at McDonald’s. If there was a problem with it, it probably would have surfaced then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Duke\_of\_Rat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Duke\_of\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duke_of_Rat)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 8:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/7 "2007-12-19T20:48:03Z")

</div>

Every year an out of state family gets “arrested” here and given box seats to the rodeo and lodging for the night, probably some dining allowances as well. They always show a smiling family posing with the officer and the Chamber of Commerce welcoming committee. They’ve been doing it for about as long as I can remember, but that may just mean that nobody has bothered to file a complaint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Leaffan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leaffan/32/299_2.png) [@Leaffan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaffan)
#### Post date: [December 19, 2007, 8:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/8 "2007-12-19T20:50:11Z")

</div>

Interesting. We have R.I.D.E. (Reduce Impaired Driving Everywhere) programs here in Ontario where police will set up road-side breathalyser tests for anyone and everyone who they want to question. These are set up in locations where once you’re on the given road there’s no chance of turning off, or backtracking to avoid them. If you’ve been drinking, you’re toast. If you haven’t been drinking, and all your papers are in order, then you might also get a corporate-sponsored free coffee from Tim Hortons or something.

The Ontario courts long ago ruled that the small infringement on human rights was well beneath the rights of public safety as a whole.

Sounds to me you’re on the same slippery slope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Spoons](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spoons/32/3141_2.png) [@Spoons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoons)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 2:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/9 "2007-12-20T02:57:35Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Leaffan]  
The Ontario courts long ago ruled that the small infringement on human rights was well beneath the rights of public safety as a whole.  
[/QUOTE]  
Just going to correct you slightly. It was the Supreme Court of Canada, and they were constitutional rights. A nice summary of the answers to “Are RIDE programs unconstitutional?” is found in [R. v. Hufsky](http://csc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1988/1988rcs1-621/1988rcs1-621.html), [1988] 1 S.C.R. 621 at paragraph 24:

> [@](#):
>
> Does the random stopping of motor vehicles by police officers pursuant to federal and/or provincial statute infringe the right to not be arbitrarily detained as guaranteed by s. 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Answer: Yes.
> 
> If the answer to [the] question…above is in the affirmative, is such statutorily permitted conduct justified by s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and therefore not inconsistent with the Constitution Act, 1982? Answer: Yes.
> 
> Was the appellant’s right to be secure against unreasonable search as guaranteed by s. 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms infringed by the “spot check” procedure employed by the investigating officer herein? Answer: No.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Omniscient](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omniscient/32/3290_2.png) [@Omniscient](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omniscient)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/10 "2007-12-20T03:16:38Z")

</div>

**Spoons** , interesting info. I did some investigation of “[s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_One_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms)” and wow, that’s some seriously worrisome legislature. As an American I was unaware of that stipulation and I must say that I would very much dislike living under it.

As to the OP, if I ever got pulled over for something like that I’d be apoplectic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Spoons](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spoons/32/3141_2.png) [@Spoons](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spoons)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/11 "2007-12-20T03:37:11Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Omniscient]  
**Spoons** , interesting info. I did some investigation of “[s. 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_One_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms)” and wow, that’s some seriously worrisome legislature. As an American I was unaware of that stipulation and I must say that I would very much dislike living under it.  
[/QUOTE]  
It does seem scary in the context you see it here. But there are also many examples in Canadian caselaw of laws that could not stand up to a _Charter_ s. 1 challenge, and were struck down by the courts. It’s sort of like a check or balance, and should prevent Parliament or provincial legislatures from enacting laws without regard to their constitutional consequences. Of course, if the Supreme Court ever gets an agenda into its head (as seems to happen at times) and attempts to “shoehorn” an impugned law into being saved by section 1, then we’re all screwed. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BobT](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/8e8cbc/32.png) [@BobT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobT)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/12 "2007-12-20T03:37:08Z")

</div>

Going back to the OP, I would assume that the police only give out the cards during daytime hours for safety reasons. And they probably don’t turn the siren on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Hostile\_Dialect](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e495f1/32.png) [@Hostile\_Dialect](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hostile_Dialect)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/13 "2007-12-20T03:51:38Z")

</div>

Even though my burning hatred of Starbucks is well-known, I would happily take a $5 gift card for not breaking the law. I’ve been practically driving in the middle of a pig parade ever since I moved into the neighborhood next to the cop shop, and all I’ve gotten in return for my obedience of the law is paranoia.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![blondebear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/blondebear/32/1022_2.png) [@blondebear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/blondebear)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/14 "2007-12-20T03:56:07Z")

</div>

I didn’t violate any traffic laws today. Can they just mail me the gift card?

Wait a minute…I **did** jaywalk. Rats!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![panache45](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/panache45/32/64_2.png) [@panache45](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panache45)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 5:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/15 "2007-12-20T05:18:17Z")

</div>

Even if this is legal, this practice will stop after the first person takes off in panic, and ends in a fatal crash. Shortly thereafter, it will no longer be legal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Loach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/loach/32/350_2.png) [@Loach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Loach)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 6:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/16 "2007-12-20T06:22:10Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Leaffan]

Sounds to me you’re on the same slippery slope.  
[/QUOTE]

Not sure what you mean. Random DWI check points have been found to be legal through several court challenges. They happen all the time in the states.

ETA: I don’t know of anything that would make the situation in the OP illegal. I find it really dumb but I can’t think of anything off the top of my head to make it illegal. Gfactor brings up some excellent points.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 7:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/17 "2007-12-20T07:32:47Z")

</div>

I have to have reasonable suspicion to pull someone over, and NOT violating the law doesn’t cut it. I’m waiting for the first legal case on this.

This sounds like a ridiculous waste of police resources. There are other public relations programs the department can participate in that doesn’t squander man hours like this. How many violators drove by while this dopey cop was giving out coffee coupons?

And why are we rewarding people for doing what they’re suppose to be doing in the first place? I don’t need praise from Big Brother, to be patted on the head and told “good boy” like one does to a freaking dog!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 7:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/18 "2007-12-20T07:40:28Z")

</div>

John Bunnell: This crook thought he could get away from a gift card, but now he’ll get plenty of free coffee, _in jail!_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![gonzomax](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e8c25b/32.png) [@gonzomax](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gonzomax)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/19 "2007-12-20T15:57:34Z")

</div>

Michigan stopped the closing of streets for blind paper searches a few years ago. I just do not want to give up my right to go around minding my own business. I got caught up in a long line once and had to go to the bathroom. I jumped out and walked up and told the cops offering to show my papers then. They got all annoyed and yelled at me. I had to wait in line. I stop at a bar to go to the toilet. I had no plans to do so.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![yabob](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yabob/32/2821_2.png) [@yabob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yabob)
#### Post date: [December 20, 2007, 3:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606/20 "2007-12-20T15:58:28Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=pkbites]  
I have to have reasonable suspicion to pull someone over, and NOT violating the law doesn’t cut it. I’m waiting for the first legal case on this.

This sounds like a ridiculous waste of police resources. There are other public relations programs the department can participate in that doesn’t squander man hours like this. How many violators drove by while this dopey cop was giving out coffee coupons?

And why are we rewarding people for doing what they’re suppose to be doing in the first place? I don’t need praise from Big Brother, to be patted on the head and told “good boy” like one does to a freaking dog!  
[/QUOTE]

Like I said, it’s been done before. I’ll bet if you dug, you would find somebody trying to start a legal case for those programs, and having it thrown out. I don’t like it either - I don’t need the inconvenience of being pulled over just to find that the cop wants to hand me a free burger or a Starbucks latte. But I think they can do it legally. And possibly, enough people react with “Why, thank you, officer, how nice of you” that the gimmick keeps surfacing as a PR exercise.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/can-you-be-pulled-over-for-not-violating-traffic-laws/430606.md?page=2)
