# Case Closed - JFK

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/case-closed-jfk/216878>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [December 4, 2003, 5:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/case-closed-jfk/216878 "2003-12-04T05:31:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2003, 12:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/case-closed-jfk/216878/21 "2003-12-05T12:56:31Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> CalMeacham, let me say with the utmost respect that I am startled that you posted that response. Weissberg’s entire career depended on selectively ignoring evidence that didn’t fit his original hypothesis.

Good Lord – don’t dare say anything at all critical of The One TRue Book, or else you’ll be seen as believing the Conspiracy and being a Nut yourself.

Get a grip – I didn’t say that I bought Weissberg’s theories hook, line, and sinker. But even a pro-conspiracy writer like Weissberg isn’t necessarily wrong in pointing out inconsistencies and errors in his opponent’s positions. It’s called “debate”.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/case-closed-jfk/216878.md?page=1)