But that seems to be a relatively unusual among real life consumer purchases where you’re generally deciding to look harder, go farther* etc. to get a lower non negotiable price or not bothering to. We don’t generally bid on things. It’s the issue with a lot of behavioral science exercises in economics seems to me, how generally applicable?
I guess you could partly conflate the two things. If somebody has say $1.5k cash on hand and sees a $3k sofa I guess you could say they were ‘willing to pay’ $1.5k cash, so having the card might ‘make’ them pay $3k instead. But in reality nobody was selling the sofa for $1.5k, any negotiability of the price is probably in a much narrower range near $3k. I’d put that down to just buying a sofa if you have a credit card which you wouldn’t buy if you didn’t have a credit card.
In general my sense is that the big effect of cards is to facilitate people spending money they don’t have (yet). The effect on people who have the money in the bank and could either ATM and spend it or card it and pay in full at the end of the billing period (as we do 100% of the time), marginal IMO, in either the ‘buy more’ or ‘pay more’ sense but I particularly doubt the latter. I wonder if a study has been done a) truly real world oriented and b) focused on people who never use credit cards to make purchases they couldn’t cover from their bank accounts.
*if that’s not burning up the savings as in the ‘I drove 15 miles to save 2 cents/gal on gas’ case. :smack: