Well, I might have worded it better. I didn’t mean an advantage over the house, I meant more of a player strategy on any particular roll. The overall odds of the game will remain the same.
If, while at the table, you only bet the pass line without taking odds you will only win (or lose) the amount of the bet. Bet $10, win (or lose) $10.
If you take odds, you can win more than the amount of your bet, but only lose the amount of your bet. Bet $10 with $20 odds, you can win $10 + more than $20, but not lose more than $30.
I prefaced my remark with it being an opinion, but it seems to me if you can win more than than you bet, it makes sense to do so.
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by muttrox
Simply wrong. Please try and justify how you get above even money.
Same mistake on my wording. What I was trying to say is basically the same as I stated to Sam above.
What I was trying to convey to the OP was that while the pass line will only pay you the amount of your bet, the odds bet will pay you more than the amount of your bet, while at the same time not allowing you to lose progressively more…on a particular roll. Again, the overall, long term odds of the game do not change.
If I bet $40 on the pass line with no odds, I can only win $40. No way around it. And only expose myself to a loss of $40.
If I bet $10 on the pass line with $30 odds, I can win more than $40 dollars, and will win more than $40 unless I lose. If I lose, I still lost only $40. So with the same amount of risk played a different manner I have a chance to win more than I wagered.
Now that might not be better than even money, I admit my vocabulary is lacking here, but to me even money would be bet $40, win $40. Better than even money would be bet $40, win more than $40.
To me, that makes sense to take the odds.