# Cause of the wildfires out west?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [September 13, 2020, 10:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516 "2020-09-13T22:40:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![razordance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e47774/32.png) [@razordance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/razordance)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/21 "2020-09-14T21:30:45Z")

</div>

So, the general consensus is, the fires are happening because of climate change?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/22 "2020-09-14T21:38:06Z")

</div>

> [@Tride](#):
>
> …  
> Amazingly, our under-construction house was surrounded by bare ground from excavation and was spared. Not so for many of our neighbors.

The various fire services generally want 50 to 100 feet of nearly bare dirt around each structure. Homeowners want trees right up alongside the house. Guess which side is being smart and which side is playing with fire?

As one California rural county example:  
[https://kerncountyfire.org/images/stories/fire\_prevention/hazardreduction/2020\_Defensible\_Space\_Guidelines.pdf](https://kerncountyfire.org/images/stories/fire_prevention/hazardreduction/2020_Defensible_Space_Guidelines.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/23 "2020-09-14T21:42:18Z")

</div>

That appears to be the sole mention of proud boys. I actually heard a person in a store say out loud that the fires were being set by antifa, and numerous other outlets seem to mention antifa (typically in a debunking effort). The RW BS machine is far stronger than anything that the left does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madsircool](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/madsircool/32/3432_2.png) [@madsircool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/madsircool)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/24 "2020-09-14T21:47:26Z")

</div>

> **[Lack Of Controlled Burns Contributing To California Wildfires](https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/lack-of-controlled-burns-contributing-to-california-wildfires/)**
>
> California's devastating wildfires have been fueled by drought, heat and what Calfire calls missed opportunities to clear overgrown forests.

> **[Why isn’t California using more prescribed burns to reduce fire risk?](https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/01/why-isnt-california-using-more-prescribed-burns-to-reduce-fire-risk/)**
>
> Controlled burns could help in many places, but progress has been slow.

> **[Will coronavirus precautions hamper our ability to fight California wildfires...](https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/2020/03/25/coronavirus-halt-controlled-burns-may-lead-california-wildires/2891844001/)**
>
> The U.S. Forest Service has paused controlled burns nationwide to protect personnel and reduce air pollution amid COVID-19. Cal Fire has yet to follow

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Yllaria](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/yllaria/32/3452_2.png) [@Yllaria](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Yllaria)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/25 "2020-09-14T22:01:06Z")

</div>

> [@razordance](#):
>
> Also, they put down logging, the practice of which involved cutting firebreaks, and which focused on harvesting the oldest, most burnable trees.

When you say loggers used to harvest the oldest, most burnable trees I assume you mean they harvested the largest trees for lumber and that large trees spread fire more efficiently. I don’t think that’s true. Trunks don’t catch nearly as well as branches do. If the fire stays out of the crown, large enough trees can survive fires that pass through.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 10:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/26 "2020-09-14T22:01:36Z")

</div>

> [@razordance](#):
>
> So, the general consensus is, the fires are happening because of climate change?

No, the general consensus is that climate change is making an already bad situation much worse. It’s a combination of factors, but more compressed rainy seasons and higher average temps are definitely impacting the situation in California. Fire season is starting earlier, lasting longer and dryer/more fuels are helping to spark them more easily and make them both larger and more intense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skywatcher](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/skywatcher/32/254_2.png) [@Skywatcher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skywatcher)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/27 "2020-09-14T22:02:51Z")

</div>

> [@Tamerlane](#):
>
> Fire season is starting earlier, lasting longer and dryer/more fuels are helping to make them larger and more intense.

Also, as noted in the MPSIMS thread, climate change is contributing to fires where there normally aren’t any.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tfletch1](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tfletch1/32/5340_2.png) [@Tfletch1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tfletch1)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/28 "2020-09-14T22:13:05Z")

</div>

> [@Tamerlane](#):
>
> Eh, no. It is the old forest management techniques that are part of the problem. To whit - they sucked. Primarily in the areas of fire management which was zero tolerance after WW II (and before, really), hence the creation of the Smokey the Bear anti-fire mascot in 1944.
> 
> What the environmentalists objected to in the 1960’s and 1970’s was primarily clear-cutting in National Forests. This was indeed scaled back, but clear-cutting, other than creating the occasional short-term moonscape, is not fire management. If anything it intensifies forest fires since a lot of clear-cutting mitigation is tree plantations which are prone to more intense crown fires. One of many reasons it’s a lousy practice. Even thinning can be [counter-productive if done improperly](https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr208en/psw_gtr208en_525-534_stone.pdf), usually by over-harvesting.
> 
> So have environmentalists changed how forests are managed? Yes, largely for the better. Have those changes negatively impacted forest fires? Mostly no. The answer is yes only insomuch as some short-sighted environmentalists, like short-sighted people everywhere, may have advocated for fire suppression in the past to “protect” particularly scenic areas.
> 
> But zero-tolerance fire suppression policies goes back long before the environmental movement began (and it began in part as a reaction to increased utilization of national forest land after WW II). Though the dangers of fire suppression were recognized by academics back in the 1950’s and 1960’s it continued for decades because:  
> a.) It has been overwhelmingly popular with the public - fires are bad in the public eye.  
> b.) Inertia. The problem has grown slowly over decades as fuel loads have steadily increased and populations have increased pushing more and more into fire-prone areas. In the 1970’s it seemed less pressing.  
> c.) To borrow a term asymmetric career risk. A controlled burn that gets out of control will generate serious backlash. Attempts at suppression, even failed attempts, generate a lot less.

This was very informative. Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 14, 2020, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/29 "2020-09-14T22:31:22Z")

</div>

No, there are far worse due to climate change. Climate change alone doesnt start a fire. But it can- and has -taken lightning strikes that might not start a large fire and turn them into thousands of acres.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![snowthx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowthx/32/10660_2.png) [@snowthx](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/snowthx)\
**Post date:** [September 15, 2020, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/30 "2020-09-15T20:34:53Z")

</div>

Quick, easy answers to complex problems are always wrong. Always. The fires in CA at least cover a vast swath of diverse landscapes: the one near Santa Cruz involves coastal redwoods that are usually dampened by fog during the summer, east of San Jose mainly grass and oak woodlands that are always dry this time of year, the one near Oroville dense conifer forest and canyons, and in Mendocino mixed forest and oak-studded grasslands (and pot farms). The combo drought, then massive heat wave, then freak dry lightening storm, then strong, dry, winds from the east, all within a few days, created the perfect once in a generation conflagration in all these environments. The main question: what changed recently?

I think we also have to agree that vegetation management is an emerging field that needs to advance a lot before we have practical solutions. Additionally, land-use policy should take all this into account and be restrictive about people building structures farther out in the woods.

The other problem is that in order to maintain forests near cities and towns there will need to be cutting and burning year-round - most people living in these areas wont take too kindly to having their clean air smoked up all the time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2020, 4:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/31 "2020-09-16T04:35:38Z")

</div>

> **[Trump Blames California for Fires. He Should Check to See Whose Land They’re On.](https://www.politico.com/news/agenda/2020/09/15/trump-fires-california-federal-land-415431)**
>
> How Washington politics and blame-shifting let the forest fire problem get out of control.

_But when Trump met California officials this week for a briefing on the wildfires, CalFire director Thomas Porter showed him a map of California’s fires, most of which were located on territory the map colored green. All of the green," Porter told him, "is federal lands.”_

_As residents of the region know well, huge swaths of the American West are federally owned. Nearly 60 percent of the forests in California, 25 percent of the forests in Oregon, and 44 percent in Washington are national forests. For the most part, the forests burning across the West—the fires the president blames on state officials—are on federal lands.Forest fire management is a complex issue, but one thing is clear: the federal commitment to it has been declining for years, and Trump has done little to reverse it. The federal government’s spending on fire prevention has been shrinking; the budget for vegetation management fell from approximately $240 million in 2001 to $180 million in 2015, a decline of 24 percent._

So trump is blaming CA for something he caused and could prevent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2020, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/32 "2020-09-16T04:47:31Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> So trump is blaming CA for something he caused and could prevent.

And it’s also something the California authorities cannot legally do anything about without his request to assist the federal government.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2020, 5:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/33 "2020-09-16T05:01:49Z")

</div>

Well, they do have _some_ forest and they could do a better job in those, sure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [September 16, 2020, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516/34 "2020-09-16T15:54:35Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> he federal government’s spending on fire prevention has been shrinking; the budget for vegetation management fell from approximately $240 million in 2001 to $180 million in 2015, a decline of 24 percent.

Actually that’s false-ish.

The 24% decline figure doesn’t consider the effects of inflation. Forest management is mostly about labor costs, and we can approximate that with the CPI. The $240M in 2001 would require a budget of $320M in 2015 to have the same buying power. 180/320 is only 56% as much money. So there’s actually been a 44% reduction in buying power, not just 24%. That’s how big a cut has happened. Admittedly only 3+ years of it under Trump; this has festering for decades.

Against a demand that’s more or less proportional to the perimeter of the inhabited zones and the amount of heat/drought occurring. Both of which have been continuously increasing over the timeframe we’re discussing. I don’t have a good way to quantify those things, but we can say a 46% cut is a soft lower bound on the actual reduction is supply of money versus demand for the services that money should be buying.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cause-of-the-wildfires-out-west/920516.md?page=1)
