# CEO of Sam's club a sexist and racist?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [December 19, 2015, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853 "2015-12-19T16:35:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/1 "2015-12-19T16:35:18Z")

</div>

Apparently she - a black - doesn’t like dealing with too many white people or too many men.

Does anyone have a better cite than [Right Wing News](http://rightwingnews.com/america/theres-a-boycott-brewing-of-sams-club-due-to-the-ceos-anti-white-remarks-and-the-company-is-doing-damage-control/)?

> [@](#):
>
> the company’s black, female CEO Rosalind Brewerplanned to fire a supplier she met with because she was disgusted that his management staff had too many White males.
> 
> It was more important to Ms. Brewer that a staff be racially and gender diverse rather than the best people be picked for their jobs. A practice she admitted to CNN’s Poppy Harlow she practices herself.

[CNN’s article](http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/16/news/companies/rosalind-brewer-sams-club-diversity/index.html) is rather less inflammatory but highlights her apparent sexism as well as racism.

> [@](#):
>
> Brewer, who has been CEO since 2012, shared an anecdote about meeting with one supplier earlier that day.  
> “The entire other side of the table was all Caucasian male,” she said. “That was interesting.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/2 "2015-12-19T17:27:45Z")

</div>

I don’t usually do the “name that fallacy” thing but this seems like a good place for it because the fallacy _isn’t_ obvious and it _is_ interesting that it fits.

You’re committing the fallacy of composition: Assuming that the best set of employees is the one consisting only of employees each of whom, individually, is the best person for the job.

Think of sports teams. Does the best team necessarily have to have all the best players in it? No–some less-than-best players may still make for the best team given the right coach and team synergies etc.

Similarly, even if the best person for the job on each hiring occasion was a white man, this doesn’t mean that having a policy of diversity will result in having a less-than-best team in the end, _even if_ it means sometimes hiring people who are not, in race-blind terms, the “best person for the job.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 5:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/3 "2015-12-19T17:34:43Z")

</div>

CEO does business with the people she prefers. There ought to be a law against that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gigi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a587f6/32.png) [@gigi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gigi)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/4 "2015-12-19T17:50:53Z")

</div>

“a black”?!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Murf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b9e5f3/32.png) [@Murf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Murf)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/5 "2015-12-19T18:02:02Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> CEO does business with the people she prefers. There ought to be a law against that.

This is supposed to be a free country. She should be able to do business with the people she prefers. If she doesn’t like white people, so what, that’s her choice. She just has to realize that it may be bad for business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Roderick\_Femm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/roderick_femm/32/14875_2.png) [@Roderick\_Femm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Roderick_Femm)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 9:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/6 "2015-12-19T21:38:09Z")

</div>

Whoosh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/7 "2015-12-19T21:51:21Z")

</div>

If I saw a management team consisting entirely of white males, I would not conclude that they are always choosing the best person for the job – I would conclude that they are always choosing the best white male for the job.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Nylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/77aa72/32.png) [@Mr.Nylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Nylock)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 9:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/8 "2015-12-19T21:57:47Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> If I saw a management team consisting entirely of white males, I would not conclude that they are always choosing the best person for the job – I would conclude that they are always choosing the best white male for the job.

Too many is different than entirely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giles/32/60_2.png) [@Giles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giles)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/9 "2015-12-19T22:05:32Z")

</div>

> [@Mr.Nylock](#):
>
> Too many is different than entirely.

True, but the second quote in the OP includes a quotation from Brewer, “The entire other side of the table was all Caucasian male.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 10:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/10 "2015-12-19T22:10:12Z")

</div>

I like how the OP asks if anyone has a better cite than [RightWingNews.com](http://RightWingNews.com), and then immediately provides a better cite himself.

> [@Mr.Nylock](#):
>
> Too many is different than entirely.

A distinction which the rag linked to in the OP does not seem to understand:

> [@](#):
>
> “The entire other side of the table was all Caucasian male,” [Brewer] said. “That was interesting.”

It is, of course, entirely unsurprising that a member of a minority pointing out a seeming example of prejudice is, herself, immediately branded a racist by the yellow press.

Also, I’d like to echo **gigi** ’s comment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/11 "2015-12-19T22:15:49Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> I like how the OP asks if anyone has a better cite than [RightWingNews.com](http://RightWingNews.com), and then immediately provides a better cite himself.

Since the two were linked, I don’t see how CNN’s is better than RWN’s.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Nylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/77aa72/32.png) [@Mr.Nylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Nylock)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 10:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/12 "2015-12-19T22:20:29Z")

</div>

> [@Giles](#):
>
> True, but the second quote in the OP includes a quotation from Brewer, “The entire other side of the table was all Caucasian male.”

The OP is a little unclear; I could have just as easily written the same exact response to the OP - your post just happened to be the one I used.

I agree with the point you make.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/13 "2015-12-19T22:23:54Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> It is, of course, entirely unsurprising that a member of a minority pointing out a seeming example of prejudice is, herself, immediately branded a racist by the yellow press.

Are you saying that a member of a majority cannot be the subject of racism or sexism?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [December 19, 2015, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/14 "2015-12-19T23:14:31Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Does anyone have a better cite than [Right Wing News](http://rightwingnews.com/america/theres-a-boycott-brewing-of-sams-club-due-to-the-ceos-anti-white-remarks-and-the-company-is-doing-damage-control/)?

Well, I’d give even chances that the next random thing I pull out of my ass would qualify.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![marshmallow](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/df705f/32.png) [@marshmallow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/marshmallow)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2015, 12:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/15 "2015-12-20T00:39:27Z")

</div>

PC police run amok. They don’t even try to argue that white dudes aren’t the devil. They just cry “racist!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Longshanks](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/e480ec/32.png) [@Longshanks](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Longshanks)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2015, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/16 "2015-12-20T00:46:23Z")

</div>

Quartz why are you such a tedious wanker for. Just get to the point, you are a white male presumably who has a problem with minoriteies that get all uppity and above their station?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2015, 1:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/17 "2015-12-20T01:22:11Z")

</div>

> [@Murf](#):
>
> This is supposed to be a free country. She should be able to do business with the people she prefers. If she doesn’t like white people, so what, that’s her choice. She just has to realize that it may be bad for business.

Uh, no. It’s actually flat out illegal to not do business with someone because of their race.

The question here is more complicated than that. Does it count as discrimination against people for their race if you use race as evidence of racist hiring practices?

I mean, it is bad evidence on its own, I’ll admit. There are plenty of reasons why a staff may wind up all white that are not caused by racism. And I would argue assuming otherwise is indeed a form of racism.

But is it the type of racism that we have made illegal?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2015, 1:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/18 "2015-12-20T01:45:56Z")

</div>

> [@marshmallow](#):
>
> PC police run amok. They don’t even try to argue that white dudes aren’t the devil. They just cry “racist!”

I concur with your sentiment–if you are talking about the white dudes crying racism. There’s a way of addressing the issue without flying off the handle about racism. They could actually try to see both sides.

In a way, I guess you can argue that they are being PC police, just not in the usual direction. How dare she even imply that a supplier with only white people could be evidence of racist hiring practices!

As far as I can tell, she’s not said she’s going to fire any supplier. She’s just said that she plans on talking with them about it. She’s not jumping to conclusions.

And as for diverse hiring practices–it’s a touchy subject. What you’re seeing her is reverse discrimination–but that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Reverse discrimination is not the same thing as discrimination against the majority. It is discrimination as an attempt to “reverse” other forms of discrimination.

Yes, in an ideal world, this is bad. But when one thing discriminates against people, discriminating the other direction at the appropriate levels can restore things back to normal.

Yes, if you overdo it, you wind up with racism against the majority, and that can be a problem, too. But it’s all a balance, and you can’t fix an unbalanced scale by always adding the same thing to both sides.

Once you do have a balanced scale, though, you can’t continue unbalancing it either direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![piepiepie](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e47774/32.png) [@piepiepie](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/piepiepie)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2015, 3:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/19 "2015-12-20T03:12:23Z")

</div>

> [@gigi](#):
>
> “a black”?!

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Apparently she - a black - doesn’t like dealing with too many **white people** or too many men…

Emphasis mine.

Note how she, the CEO of a fairly large company, is just “a black”, but the men she “doesn’t like dealing with” are at least _people_. And that’s exactly when I stopped caring about the matter presented in the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fubaya](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c2a13f/32.png) [@Fubaya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fubaya)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2015, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853/20 "2015-12-20T03:36:48Z")

</div>

There is a difference in the articles. The CNN article explains how they like to nudge suppliers into having more diverse sales teams and quotes her saying she planned to call the supplier. The right wing stuff says she planned to fire the supplier. Maybe there’s other info anywhere but I see no evidence of that from the original quote. The right wing sites added that to make it more inflammatory.

What I get from the CNN article is that she does business with everyone but let’s them know she wants to see diversity in their sales teams.

What I get from the right wing articles is that she refuses to do business with whites and males because she’s racist and sexist and poor white males have it tough enough already.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ceo-of-sams-club-a-sexist-and-racist/740853.md?page=2)
