# Cesario, you're awfully sanctimonious for a pedophile

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [September 29, 2009, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973 "2009-09-29T14:48:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jettboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/85e7bf/32.png) [@Jettboy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jettboy)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/81 "2009-09-29T19:32:42Z")

</div>

I was slightly familiar with Cesario, mainly from the “Youth Sufferage” thread, but after reading this I am thoroughly creeped out. I just want to rub myself down with Purell.

Anyone who can seriously write the phrase “…very attractive 4-year old” is… I 'dunno; help me out with an adjective. Repugnant? Icky? I just can’t get that phrase out of my mind; I imagine it being delivered in a lispy, wet, asthmatic whisper punctuated by “…heh, heh, heh.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 7:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/82 "2009-09-29T19:37:52Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> Where was the thread where he brought up the hypothetical about waking up and finding a six-year-old um, “performing” on him, and how when she was finished, he’d gentley explain that next time, she needs to ask permission – because most people aren’t “like him.” Or something like that – I can’t remember exactly.

He didn’t bring up the hypothetical, he just responded to it. IIRC, it was **Shodan** who brought it up.

And I find the threats and implied threats in this thread a hell of a lot more objectionable than Cesario’s trolling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 7:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/83 "2009-09-29T19:39:55Z")

</div>

> [@mswas](#):
>
> But he gets negative reinforcement here on the Dope. That’s the point.

That may be why he came here.

> [@](#):
>
> Why must he shut up? Why can’t you control yourself enough to scroll past his posts?

He’s got a habit of hijacking threads by pushing them toward one of his favorite subjects, and that’s generally frowned on. Of course, it’s also true that once he shows up in a thread, even if he does not say something immediately related to pedophilia, one poster or another will ask him about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rigamarole](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/77aa72/32.png) [@Rigamarole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rigamarole)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/84 "2009-09-29T19:56:14Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> **Rigamarole** – go to hell. So it wasn’t “rape-rape”, as Whoopi Goldberg put it, I believe? So if I’m raped by someone I know, it’s not as bad as being raped by some stranger on the side of a road? Again, you can go directly to hell. Do not pass go, do not collect 100 dollars.

What are you talking about? Where did I say any of that? I said statutory rape isn’t necessarily as severe as forcible rape, but both are clearly criminal. I don’t even understand how that could be controversial.

[QUOTE=TubaDiva]  
There is no gradation of wrongness, it’s just plain wrong.  
[/quote]

Generally speaking our legal system _is_ set up to distinguish gradations of wrongness. That’s why manslaughter and first-degree murder carry different punishments, even though the outcome may be physically equal.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/85 "2009-09-29T20:12:41Z")

</div>

> [@mswas](#):
>
> Basically there is a tendency on these forums to try and shut people up that I just do not experience elsewhere.

Well, then, elsewhere is full of wimps because, frankly, you’re a putz.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![E-Sabbath](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e19adc/32.png) [@E-Sabbath](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/E-Sabbath)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/86 "2009-09-29T20:34:16Z")

</div>

> [@Angry Lurker](#):
>
> Is he really that guy? If so wtf is he allowed on the internet for at all?

He’s not actually that specific person. I don’t think. I mean, he’s ‘that guy’. Eg, that guy who thinks it’s fine to have sex with 14 month olds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/87 "2009-09-29T20:34:36Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> He didn’t bring up the hypothetical, he just responded to it. IIRC, it was **Shodan** who brought it up

Nope.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/88 "2009-09-29T21:00:49Z")

</div>

> [@mswas](#):
>
> Why must he shut up? Why can’t you control yourself enough to scroll past his posts?

He _doesn’t_ have to shut up. But neither do I have to scroll past his posts instead of declaring that he’s a sick pervert whose predelictions should be granted neither implicit respect nor dialogue.

If you choose to interpret that as me trying to shut him up, fine. Unlike you I don’t believe every person is privileged to talk about any topic they like without outraged opposition, even when that topic is offensive and against common decency. We should be so lucky as to have our collective disapproval shut him up and get him to leave. In that event, he shouldn’t let the door hit him on the ass on the way out.

This idea that any POV is a legitimate POV is exactly what I’m talking about, regarding the perniciousness of Tolerance when taken to absolutely ridiculous extremes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Poster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Happy\_Poster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Poster)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/89 "2009-09-29T21:16:35Z")

</div>

> [@Jodi](#):
>
> This idea that any POV is a legitimate POV is exactly what I’m talking about, regarding the perniciousness of Tolerance when taken to absolutely ridiculous extremes.

Any POV could, in theory, be legitimate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/90 "2009-09-29T21:19:42Z")

</div>

> [@Angry Lurker](#):
>
> Any POV could, in theory, be legitimate.

Even if that were true, which I do not grant, it does not mean the reverse, that _every_ POV _must be_ legitimate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Poster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Happy\_Poster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Poster)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/91 "2009-09-29T21:26:22Z")

</div>

> [@Jodi](#):
>
> Even if that were true, which I do not grant, it does not mean the reverse, that _every_ POV _must be_ legitimate.

No, but it does mean we shouldn’t declare the advocating of any particular POV to be out of bounds.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mr.Miskatonic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.miskatonic/32/310_2.png) [@Mr.Miskatonic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Miskatonic)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/92 "2009-09-29T21:30:42Z")

</div>

> [@Marley23](#):
>
> “You’re awfully sanctimonious for a pedophile” is the best line I’ve read here in a little while.

I can’t get away from thinking about Alan Rickman saying with his Die Hard German accent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/93 "2009-09-29T21:33:38Z")

</div>

> [@Angry Lurker](#):
>
> No, but it does mean we shouldn’t declare the advocating of any particular POV to be out of bounds.

I haven’t declared any such thing. But I think when you embrace a POV that is repugnant, you take the chance that people will in no uncertain terms inform you that your POV is repugnant and that you are contemptible for holding it.

That’s what free speech means. Person A gets to say whatever disgusting indefensible thing he wants, and then Person B gets to point out it’s disgusting and indefensible. Free speech doesn’t mean no consequences for anything you say.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LunaticFringette](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/fbc32d/32.png) [@LunaticFringette](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LunaticFringette)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/94 "2009-09-29T21:34:27Z")

</div>

**Guinastasia:** He didn’t say he was gay so much as compare bigotry against pedophiles as bigotry against gays – that the NAMBLA founders were being targeted by homophobic bigots, rather than those concerned with child molestors. In his sick, twisted mind, NAMBLA is about gay rights, not the rights of child molestors.

I only bring this up because he contradicts himself… and I want to know whether to put the bubble around my granddaughter or grandson

He says he’s gay… [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11581589#post11581589](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11581589#post11581589) post #91

He says he’s straight… [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11595018#post11595018](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11595018#post11595018) post #5

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LunaticFringette](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/fbc32d/32.png) [@LunaticFringette](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LunaticFringette)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/95 "2009-09-29T21:39:23Z")

</div>

Sorry, Guin. Screwed up the quote. I was distracted with blowing up my bubble.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Poster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Happy\_Poster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Poster)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/96 "2009-09-29T21:40:44Z")

</div>

> [@Jodi](#):
>
> I haven’t declared any such thing. But I think when you embrace a POV that is repugnant, you take the chance that people will in no uncertain terms inform you that your POV is repugnant and that you are contemptible for holding it.
> 
> That’s what free speech means. Person A gets to say whatever disgusting indefensible thing he wants, and then Person B gets to point out it’s disgusting and indefensible. Free speech doesn’t mean no consequences for anything you say.

I still can’t work out if we’re in complete agreement or if we’re disagreeing somewhere 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Poster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/c89c15/32.png) [@Happy\_Poster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Poster)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/97 "2009-09-29T21:41:45Z")

</div>

> [@LunaticFringette](#):
>
> He says he’s gay… [http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11581589#post11581589](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=11581589#post11581589) post #91

Any reasonable reading of that post has him coming out as a nonce

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jodi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/7feea3/32.png) [@Jodi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jodi)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/98 "2009-09-29T21:42:28Z")

</div>

> [@Angry Lurker](#):
>
> I still can’t work out if we’re in complete agreement or if we’re disagreeing somewhere 🙂

Well, let me know. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/99 "2009-09-29T21:45:25Z")

</div>

> [@Angry Lurker](#):
>
> Any reasonable reading of that post has him coming out as a nonce

You’re misreading the post. The story is about **Cesario** telling his father that he is attracted to children.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nars\_Glinley](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nars_glinley/32/8177_2.png) [@Nars\_Glinley](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nars_Glinley)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2009, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973/100 "2009-09-29T21:45:46Z")

</div>

Frankly, I find **Cesario’s** posts so beyond the pale that I assume he’s just messing with us, not unlike the guy who claimed to undergo sexual reassignment surgery and then continued teaching. (Can’t find the thread for it.) \*\* LunaticFringette’s\*\* examples just further this notion.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cesario-youre-awfully-sanctimonious-for-a-pedophile/511973.md?page=6)
