I admit that I wasn’t sure how this thread was going to go. Your candid about face was refreshing. ![]()
I assume you’re no longer challenging the suspension? ![]()
I admit that I wasn’t sure how this thread was going to go. Your candid about face was refreshing. ![]()
I assume you’re no longer challenging the suspension? ![]()
Now you do!
Oh, hell no. Now my only question is a very mild What took so long?
Of course it is. If a woman just stayed at home, locked in her bedroom wearing a burka, it would significantly lower her chances of being assaulted.
…prove it.
Sure. No women who were locked in their bedroom wearing a burka have ever been assaulted. Women who don’t do that have.
QED
…cite?
Cite the statistics so we can compare the figures, and quantify the degree of risk, and how much lower the chances of being assaulted are? Would a woman who lives in a country where the burka is the norm be at less risk or at more risk of being assaulted locked in her bedroom with her husband than a woman in Alabama walking down the street?
Your response was not a “mathematical proof”, and your proof is not complete. If this were in General Questions your response would be challenged. As we are in ATMB: the appropriate thing for me to do is simply stop responding to this hijack.
Kind of hard for me to cite things that didn’t happen.
…how do you know it hasn’t happened?
Because I haven’t seen any cites from you showing that it HAS happened.
Given the OP’s questions have been addressed, I’m going to do you a favor and close this thread.
[/moderating]