# Chemical Castration-A Good Idea?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [April 2, 2011, 2:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901 "2011-04-02T02:12:17Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 18\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2011, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/21 "2011-04-02T17:50:10Z")

</div>

> [@Renee](#):
>
> For violent rapists and child abusers, I’d be in favor of it. How does the chemical part work? Is it something that is done once, or do the hormone treatments have to be done periodically? Actually, I’d be fine with actual, physical castration as long as the burden of proof in those cases was very high–in other words for very egregious cases of child rape and repeat violent rapists, off with the balls. Frankly, I don’t care if there is a female equivalent or not. I suspect the loss of the balls would be a stronger deterrent than jail time for most men.

Prison for child abusers is pretty bad, and doesn’t deter. If you actually castrate a man, you are giving him an incentive to commit more crimes. The point of incarceration is to protect the public from dangerous people. The danger doesn’t go away by chemically or physically castrating a man.

It’s a very rough analog, but this thread reminded me of [this story](http://www.horrormasters.com/Text/a0333.pdf).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrBerious](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MrBerious](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrBerious)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2011, 5:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/22 "2011-04-02T17:59:45Z")

</div>

> [@Renee](#):
>
> ctually, I’d be fine with actual, physical castration as long as the burden of proof in those cases was very high–in other words for very egregious cases of child rape and repeat violent rapists, off with the balls.

High like beyond reasonable doubt, and egregious like those satanic sex abuse cases which turned out to be completely made up? You going to grow back those guy’s balls when convictions inevitably get overturned?

The law can’t even be trusted 100% with murder cases where it’s beyond doubt that someone actually died.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2011, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/23 "2011-04-02T19:06:02Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> Rape and crimes of such nature.

Saying the same thing twice is not a definition-_which_ crimes?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/96bed5/32.png) [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Patty_O_Furniture)\
**Post date:** [April 2, 2011, 7:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/24 "2011-04-02T19:17:27Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> For rape and other sexual crimes.

> [@](#):
>
> Rape and crimes of such nature.

You’re really evading the question. What are the “other sexual crimes” and/or “crimes of such nature”? Before we start making laws permitting the castration of people, I think it’s a good idea to clearly define the crime so that a court will be able to determine whether or not it has actually been committed. You’ve identified rape, but you seem to have a list of “other sexual crimes” in mind that I’d rather not guess about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2011, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/25 "2011-04-03T05:09:04Z")

</div>

> [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](#):
>
> You’re really evading the question. What are the “other sexual crimes” and/or “crimes of such nature”? Before we start making laws permitting the castration of people, I think it’s a good idea to clearly define the crime so that a court will be able to determine whether or not it has actually been committed. You’ve identified rape, but you seem to have a list of “other sexual crimes” in mind that I’d rather not guess about.

Rape and violent sexual actions in general.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2011, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/26 "2011-04-03T06:00:29Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> Rape and violent sexual actions in general.

Okay, forget rape, we got that. But what are “violent sexual actions”? Would you please be specific? Gah!

OTHER than rape.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/96bed5/32.png) [@Patty\_O\_Furniture](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Patty_O_Furniture)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2011, 1:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/27 "2011-04-03T13:05:28Z")

</div>

Prosecutor: Your Honor, the defendant has been accused of a violent sexual action. The state requests…

Judge: A what?

P: A violent sexual action.

J: What’s that?

P: It’s a sexual crime.

J: What kind of sexual crime?

P: It’s like rape.

J: Is it rape?

P: No, but it is of such nature.

J: What do you mean by nature? Did he have sex outdoors?

P: No, but it was a sexual action that was quite violent.

J: Ah, you mean a violent sexual action.

P: Yes! Exactly!

J: And what’s that again?

And so on.

This language is about as useful as when a mother tells her daughter never to let a stranger touch her “you know where”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elbows](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/b3f665/32.png) [@elbows](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elbows)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2011, 2:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/28 "2011-04-03T14:59:58Z")

</div>

I could see it having some uses.

Convicted violent sex offender, or repeat offender, lifetime imprisonment, no chance of parole.

Eligible for parole, (after X number of years), condition of parole = agree to chemical castration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![code\_grey](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/f4b2a3/32.png) [@code\_grey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/code_grey)\
**Post date:** [April 3, 2011, 10:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/29 "2011-04-03T22:28:42Z")

</div>

**Qin Shi Huangdi** , why don’t you reread "The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment " by C.S. Lewis [The Humanitarian Theory of Punishment \<p\> C.S. Lewis](http://www.angelfire.com/pro/lewiscs/humanitarian.html) ? That should clarify in your mind why “curing” criminals is a profoundly bad idea in the long term, regardless of whatever pomps and empty promises it seems to offer initially.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Borzo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/43a26b/32.png) [@Borzo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Borzo)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2011, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/30 "2011-04-04T01:41:04Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> The biological imperative plays a part. Otherwise, why choose rape over other violent acts?
> 
> When people say “it’s not about sex,” they are more saying that sexual desires in and of themselves will not motivate you to rape someone. They are saying that rape can’t be excused by sexual desires, as we (nearly) all have the latter, but don’t all do the former.

I think violence and control is a _huge_ part of it.

For $30 you could get a prostitute and save yourself the significant criminal charges - if you indeed have an urgent biological need.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2011, 1:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/31 "2011-04-04T01:48:18Z")

</div>

> [@Guinastasia](#):
>
> Okay, forget rape, we got that. But what are “violent sexual actions”? Would you please be specific? Gah!
> 
> OTHER than rape.

Vigorous self-abuse, I suspect, is the idea being danced around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Autolycus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@Autolycus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Autolycus)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2011, 4:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/32 "2011-04-04T04:54:22Z")

</div>

Chemical castration? Woooah. That’s going a bit far. They just need some graham crackers. That’ll quench those urges to commit `violent sexual actions.`

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2011, 11:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/33 "2011-04-04T11:15:30Z")

</div>

> [@VinylTurnip](#):
>
> Vigorous self-abuse, I suspect, is the idea being danced around.

The same idea was danced about in[this thread…](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=600498&highlight=desire)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lust4Life](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/ecc23a/32.png) [@Lust4Life](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lust4Life)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2011, 5:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/34 "2011-04-10T17:23:15Z")

</div>

I have no cite but I recall reading about a paedophile who requested “Chemical castration”, because he couldn’t help but react to his urges.

It is not permament, so does no long lasting harm to the subject.

It gets the subjects “life back”, he/she can live a normal life from that point onwards.

If they don’t wish to be subjected to it then they can be incarcerated, and in the U.K. be subject to monitoring on release.  
(Though this has been notoriously inefficient)

It stops kids/women/men becoming future victims.

If it doesn’t work for all then don’t try it on those whom it doesn’t .

But don’t just say lets not bother.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Broomstick](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/broomstick/32/246_2.png) [@Broomstick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Broomstick)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2011, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/35 "2011-04-10T18:33:23Z")

</div>

But how could you determine who it works and who it doesn’t ahead of time? Seriously, until it’s tried there’s no way to be sure.

And I would say, IF we even consider it, that it would have to be something initiated by the sex criminal himself. If we let the legal system start handing out that sentence it’s going to be abused if past history is anything to go by.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Annie-Xmas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ecc23a/32.png) [@Annie-Xmas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Annie-Xmas)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2011, 6:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/36 "2011-04-10T18:41:32Z")

</div>

Iy may not curb the desire. Ask any guy how they feel when they are horney as hell and can’t get it up. When that happens, there’s is no shortage of other body parts (i.e. fingers) and objects that can be inserted.

And as was stated above, testoserone will negate the effects of chemical castration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![scamartistry](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/919ad9/32.png) [@scamartistry](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scamartistry)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2011, 8:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/37 "2011-04-10T20:19:51Z")

</div>

This is already widely used in medicine for repeat sexual offenders. Usually on a voluntary basis.

What you basically do is give the patient anti-androgens to reduce their libido. The effects are reversible wears off not long after cessation treatment. This is usually together with some psychologic training (ex CBT)

People I talked to have been very happy with the treatment partly b/c now they don’t get a raging boner every time they see someone under 10 years of age. It’s easier to not do something stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Noel\_Prosequi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/b19c9b/32.png) [@Noel\_Prosequi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Noel_Prosequi)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2011, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901/38 "2011-04-14T01:16:14Z")

</div>

Technological fixes for existential problems have a habit of not working. Psychopharmacology does not prevent depression and schizophrenia being very dangerous (to the sufferer) illnesses. Depressive suicides are highly common, notwithstanding the best will of those who administer the drugs.

Hormone therapy for sex offenders might work sometimes, but the problem is that unless it is an extremely reliable fix for sexually abberant behaviour, it is unsatisfactory.

And sexual misbehaviour is not penis misbehaviour. It is mind misbehaviour. Making the penis stop working does not change the mindset of offenders. It sometimes makes them worse, in the sense that a person with sexual disfunction not uncommonly requires more and more exotic fantasy (or real) stimulus to achieve their desired outcome (sorry). I have prosecuted people who could prove without doubt, from well conducted tests, that they were impotent - they simply could not achieve an erection, through old age, cardiovascular problems or whatever. Yet they still fiddled little kids.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chemical-castration-a-good-idea/576901.md?page=1)
