I don’t mean to malign the average worker at the plant. It just seems like they went way out of their way to accurately portray the horror of the incident - and I fully support this - but they should, in the interest of fairness and accuracy, also show what lead up to the incident, which was some crazy shit that you could probably only realistically see in somewhere like the USSR. I don’t even think China has such reckless disregard for human life as to do the sort of thing they did.
If the message people get from this series is “oh shit, any nuclear reactor could explode like that at any time even when everyone does everything right!” that’s pretty horrific lie.
I wish I could remember where I saw it, but I read a deeply technical article in a magazine - maybe it was national geographic, maybe popular mechanics, something like that - which listed, IIRC, 26 mistakes (or more accurately, reckless and negligent decisions) for Chernobyl to have resulted.
Off the top of my head - they were originally scheduled to conduct a test to see if the momentum of the reactor cycle could keep the core cooled down long enough for the backup generators to kick in. This is an inherently dangerous test, because if the answer to this is “no”, you’re risking a meltdown. They had no backup plan. During the scheduled time of the test, another power plant went offline and they required that the reactor at chernobyl stay up for another 18 hours. So after that 18 hours, they had an entire different shift at that plant which had not been briefed or trained on the test they wanted to conduct. And the few managerial/supervisory types who were overseeing the test had been running all that time on no sleep. And yet they forced the test to occur then.
The reactor prevented their attempts to operate it in an unsafe way, and then they manually bypassed those safeties, and then another safety system kicked in to prevent them from doing what they wanted to do, and they bypassed that - all the way to the point where I remember that they had to get hammers from the tool repository to physically bash or destroy some of the physical safety features to get the plant to operate in the way they intended. I can’t imagine a group that just manually disabled 6 safety systems could possibly think “What’s happening!? We did everything right!”
It’s actually a lot more detailed, horrifying, and with many more reckless and negligent decisions than I just listed. It’s utterly staggering when you read what they did. It’s as if they were daring the plant to explode, and the safety systems defeated them 6 separate times, but finally human ingenuity and some fucking hammers to physically destroy safety systems won out.
I’m sure the people working at the plant wanted nothing to do with it, but it was a very soviet “these are what the higher ups say, let’s make it happen no matter how fucking incredibly stupid or negligent or unsafe this is” type of affair. Something like Chernobyl would never happen in a first world country. Which isn’t to say that other types of nuclear accidents aren’t possible, but it’s grossly unfair to look at Chernobyl and think “yep, that’s what can just happen at a nuclear plant even if you do everything right”
Chernobyl is horrific not only because of the loss of life and contamination, but because it hardened the public’s resolve against nuclear power, and here we are, 30 years later, paying the price for that. So if this miniseries doesn’t portray that, if it only shows the horror, if it gives the public the impression that this is just something that happens with nuclear power, and it galvanizes and reinforces the public’s hatred of nuclear power even as we now know how devastating to our environment such an attitude is, the miniseries itself is negligent and reckless.
I don’t normally refuse to watch things on principle, but if that’s the way they’re going to portray it, I’m just not going to watch it. I turned it off as soon as the guy said “we did everything right” - but I figured I’d come here and see if maybe they did portray all of this and just the first part is misleading.