# Chess: glee v Mosier

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chess-glee-v-mosier/605116>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [December 5, 2011, 11:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chess-glee-v-mosier/605116 "2011-12-05T11:58:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amarone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e0b2c6/32.png) [@amarone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/amarone)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2011, 3:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chess-glee-v-mosier/605116/9 "2011-12-06T15:52:32Z")

</div>

As a minor hijack, all these various openings and defences makes me wonder whether the analysis available with modern computing power has been able to prove any longstanding openings/defenses as being suboptimal?

I play bridge and the ability to use computers to analyze thousands of deals is now affecting thinking in certain areas of bidding and play.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chess-glee-v-mosier/605116)._