This isn’t true. You were the one who first called attention to the ‘childfree’ calling them radicals, use of the term PC fanaticism, the decision to define themselves in that manner odd, that there was a common chip on their shoulder, and had already come to the conclusion that what undergirds the childfree is a kind of bigotry that treats children as consumer products. This was all stated well before the discussion got raucous. Here. Here. Here.
From the other thread:
Post one instance of a CBC person in either these threads who has claimed to be oppressed.