[QUOTE=Excalibre]
Nope, that one would be pronounced “Yen” (though in this case, she’s not using Pinyin romanization, as Pinyin would spell that “Yan”. No, I don’t know why. I don’t think there’s an answer to why that is.)
[/QUOTE]
Thanks. So that’s one we got right? 
As regards the vowel after the consonant thing:
Some textbooks for learning Chinese give you a chart of which combinations can follow which vowels. They forget to tell you that the “i” which follows “q” is pronounced differently from the “i” that follows “ch”–<sigh>.
As far as reading being easier than speaking/listening, it depends on you. I know folks who just hear a word and remember it. Then there are those of us (including yours truely) who see patterns but can’t hear for sh*t. I have a much easier time remembering characters, which are quite visual.
It’s probably the influence of Albanian. Seriously. Albanian is the only other orthography that uses the letter <q> for a palatal phoneme. Their current romanized orthography dates back to 1912 when Albania gained independence, IIRC. Wasn’t China the only ally Albania had in the world in 1958? Wasn’t there some scientific and intellectual exchange between the two countries during that period?
you’re correct that under Hoxha, china was Albania’s only ally. not sure if any influence on developing pinyin. relationship was based more on exporting Maoism.
As long as I’m comparing Chinese with Eastern European languages, the phonemic palatal/retroflex opposition is found in Polish, which I found out when working with a Polish woman who had studied a bit of linguistics and comparing notes.
Palatal:
q = ć (should display as c with an acute accent)
x = ś (s with an accent)
j ~ ź (z with an accent)
Actually, the Polish affricate to match Chinese j is dź, but ź fits in the phonemic grid better for comparison with the Chinese palatal series.
Retroflex:
ch = cz
sh = sz
zh ~ rz or ż (should display as z with a dot on top) - phonemically, although drz is the corresponding affricate.
The consonant cluster trz is pronounced the same as cz (like English “ch”) . So in case anyone was wondering how to pronounce Yastrzemski in the original Polish, it’s approximately yas-CHEM-ski. Brezinski = bzhe-ZHIN-ski.
Dental:
ts = c
s = s
z ~ z (phonemically, although Polish dental dz is the corresponding affricate)
Not only that, the Polish nonpalatal vowel y is in complementary distribution with the palatal i, as far as I can tell from a quick glance through a Polish word list. I always find y following retroflex consonants (including the letter r), and i following palatal consonants. This corresponds closely with the two different Chinese vowel sounds of i after retroflex or dental consonants (sounds like Polish y, a back vowel) and after palatal consonants (sounds like Polish i, a front vowel). In both Mandarin and Polish, r is the fourth member of each retroflex series.
Sanskrit has the corresponding 3-way series, but only for unvoiced fricatives:
palatal श ś
retroflex ष ṣ (should display as s with a dot under it)
dental स s
Likewise in Sanskrit, /r/ is associated with the production of retroflex phonemes.
The correspondence of Polish voiced consonants with Chinese unvoiced ones, and Polish unvoiced consonants with Chinese aspirated ones, isn’t phonetically exact, but it does make the series line up nicely with one another.
I meant Brzezinski.