# Chomsky: Is this man I deeply respect a bigot and a sympathizer for certain acts of genocide?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [October 1, 2012, 8:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422 "2012-10-01T20:53:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Untoward\_Parable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/51bf81/32.png) [@Untoward\_Parable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Untoward_Parable)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/21 "2012-10-03T21:13:24Z")

</div>

If I hadn’t gone through something yet it’s not because I am choosing not to, I simply have not had time yet, this is fairly dense stuff with a lot of sourcing that is difficult to track down and rate. I haven’t looked at the USNI yet but citing an organization’s own claims of independence isn’t exactly good evidence that they are independent and without bias. (not saying they aren’t as I haven’t had time to look at them yet but if I were to take that as the measure of legitimacy I’d have to accept Fox News as Independent and unbiased.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 9:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/22 "2012-10-03T21:48:30Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> I haven’t looked at the USNI yet but citing an organization’s own claims of independence isn’t exactly good evidence that they are independent and without bias.

The problem is that he claims it’s an official Navy source, when it’s not affiliated with the Navy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/23 "2012-10-03T22:03:45Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> I haven’t looked at the USNI yet but citing an organization’s own claims of independence isn’t exactly good evidence that they are independent and without bias.

You sir are a scholar worthy of Chomsky’s legacy.:rolleyes: You haven’t looked at it but have already concluded it is biased, and missed the point of the whole thing, which is what **Telemark** said.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![panaccione](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/94ad74/32.png) [@panaccione](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/panaccione)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/24 "2012-10-03T22:54:50Z")

</div>

> [@astro](#):
>
> I don’t care what you say my vote is still with the tigers.

hahahah I think we found a winner!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jackmannii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jackmannii/32/311_2.png) [@Jackmannii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jackmannii)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2012, 11:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/25 "2012-10-03T23:21:58Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> the damnation of Chomsky

An obscure yet highly boring opera (the score by Philip Glass does have its moments).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Untoward\_Parable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/51bf81/32.png) [@Untoward\_Parable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Untoward_Parable)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 3:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/26 "2012-10-04T03:46:13Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> You sir are a scholar worthy of Chomsky’s legacy.:rolleyes: You haven’t looked at it but have already concluded it is biased, and missed the point of the whole thing, which is what **Telemark** said.

I didnt say anything of the kind, I simply said that using a sources own assertion’s as proof is silly. If these are the kinds of things that bother you about Chomsky you might as well write off every academic ever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ibn\_Warraq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e19b73/32.png) [@Ibn\_Warraq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ibn_Warraq)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 4:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/27 "2012-10-04T04:14:43Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> I didnt say anything of the kind, I simply said that using a sources own assertion’s as proof is silly. If these are the kinds of things that bother you about Chomsky you might as well write off every academic ever.

Most academics have not been caught manufacturing quotes and falsely attributing them to people.

Nor have most academics felt the need to praise Holocaust Deniers for engaging in “extensive historical research” and publishing their “findings” nor do they feel the need to insist such Holocaust Deniers are not anti-Semites but “apolitical liberals”.

And, of course, most academics don’t declare “I see no anti-Semitic implications in denial of the gas chambers or denial of the Holocaust.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 4:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/28 "2012-10-04T04:33:16Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> I didnt say anything of the kind, I simply said that using a sources own assertion’s as proof is silly. If these are the kinds of things that bother you about Chomsky you might as well write off every academic ever.

Yeah, you did, and you missed the point that Chomsky statement that the USNI _Proceedings_ is the official journal of the US Navy is entirely 100% untrue. The USNI is not the official anything of the US Navy; it is as it says a non-profit , non-partisan organization with no connection to the US government. I was a member myself for a number of years; subscribing to the journal _Proceedings_ makes you a member (and the membership gives a discount on books that they publish, so no reason not to accept the membership). I have never served in the US Navy or any armed service, and the closest I’ve been to sailing the sea is canoeing in rivers and lakes.

You are making a fool of yourself by stating that these are the things that bother me about Chomsky; I’ve made very clear the things that disgust me about Chomsky and you have yet to address them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Untoward\_Parable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/51bf81/32.png) [@Untoward\_Parable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Untoward_Parable)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 6:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/29 "2012-10-04T06:59:20Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> Yeah, you did, and you missed the point that Chomsky statement that the USNI _Proceedings_ is the official journal of the US Navy is entirely 100% untrue. The USNI is not the official anything of the US Navy; it is as it says a non-profit , non-partisan organization with no connection to the US government. I was a member myself for a number of years; subscribing to the journal _Proceedings_ makes you a member (and the membership gives a discount on books that they publish, so no reason not to accept the membership). I have never served in the US Navy or any armed service, and the closest I’ve been to sailing the sea is canoeing in rivers and lakes.
> 
> You are making a fool of yourself by stating that these are the things that bother me about Chomsky; I’ve made very clear the things that disgust me about Chomsky and you have yet to address them.

again youre reading into my responses things that are not there, I never said what they were, I never looked it up, I have not had time yet, I said that quoting a source as proof of its own legitimacy is absurd. That is all I said, a cite from the organization themselves was used to define their objectivity, if u want to demonstrate somethings objectivity you need outside sources of integrity to do so or you might as well not cite anything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Telemark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/telemark/32/372_2.png) [@Telemark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Telemark)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 11:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/30 "2012-10-04T11:29:28Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> I never said what they were, I never looked it up, I have not had time yet, I said that quoting a source as proof of its own legitimacy is absurd. That is all I said, a cite from the organization themselves was used to define their objectivity, if u want to demonstrate somethings objectivity you need outside sources of integrity to do so or you might as well not cite anything.

It’s not defining their legitimacy or objectivity, it’s defining their authority. And you’re wrong, and Chomsky was wrong. Just accept it and move on. You’re going through the dance that Chomsky needs to go through to maintain the facade that he’s not wrong and all it does is make you look like a weasel.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Malthus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/85f322/32.png) [@Malthus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malthus)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 5:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/31 "2012-10-04T17:14:14Z")

</div>

> [@Jackmannii](#):
>
> An obscure yet highly boring opera (the score by Philip Glass does have its moments).

Damn, made me laugh. I tip my hat to you! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/32 "2012-10-04T17:27:23Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> again youre reading into my responses things that are not there, I never said what they were, I never looked it up, I have not had time yet, I said that quoting a source as proof of its own legitimacy is absurd.

You’ve been ducking behind ‘not having the time to look it up’ for 3 days now and still have not responded to anything of substance. I am reading nothing into your responses; you have barely responded. You have yet again completely missed the point; it has nothing to do with the legitimacy of a source, it has everything to do with Chomsky being completely, utterly, demonstrably wrong in calling _Proceedings_ the official journal of the US Navy when it is nothing of the sort. Why on earth you are wasting time with this when you should be looking through all these other sources you claim to have to look through is beyond me. Do you actually imagine that _Proceedings_ secretly is the official journal of the US Navy and they are conspiring to hide that fact?

> [@](#):
>
> That is all I said, a cite from the organization themselves was used to define their objectivity, if u want to demonstrate somethings objectivity you need outside sources of integrity to do so or you might as well not cite anything.

Which has nothing to do with anything. Nowhere was any claim made of the objectivity or lack thereof of the USNI. What was made was a statement of fact: Chomsky referred to the USNI’s journal _Proceedings_ as the official journal of the US Navy, something that is 100% entirely untrue, demonstrably untrue, that I demonstrated was untrue. Your response has been nonsense about ‘objectivity’. Again, do you think the USNI is actually an official part of the US Navy and government, that _Proceedings_ is the official journal of the US Navy and that they are conspiring to conceal this? If not your entire response on this issue has been one long non sequitur.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Untoward\_Parable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/51bf81/32.png) [@Untoward\_Parable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Untoward_Parable)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 9:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/33 "2012-10-04T21:47:19Z")

</div>

I haven’t been dodging anything, i have a life, maybe you don’t, ill get to it when i get to it, of course if you cant understand simple logic i don’t know why i should even respond since it doesnt seem like you’ll even know when you’ve lost an argument.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FinnAgain](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/finnagain/32/12500_2.png) [@FinnAgain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FinnAgain)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/34 "2012-10-04T21:53:03Z")

</div>

Being that you haven’t even really addressed, let alone responded to something that shows that Chomsky simply inventing and/or misreading a factual matter? That, in fact, you’ve repeatedly responded with non sequitors instead of a reasoned arument? I don’t think it’s the folks who you’re allegedly going to be debating against who don’t realize they’re losing an argument.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Untoward\_Parable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/51bf81/32.png) [@Untoward\_Parable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Untoward_Parable)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 10:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/35 "2012-10-04T22:13:59Z")

</div>

Regardless looking at their vast publications now, the USNI just look like another of the many military media entities that act as surrogates for the US military. Maybe it’s not their official public journal by way of non-profit semantic subterfuge but it seems to be exactly that. They promote the Navy with leadership from the Navy, with funding from donors who support the Navy, with partnerships throughout the DOD and other surrogate entities.

Everyone seems to have something Chomsky says that offends their sensibilities, so they look for these gotchas in his writing which are only gotchas if youre already angry and not willing to think for a second before reacting about what he’s saying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Untoward\_Parable](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/51bf81/32.png) [@Untoward\_Parable](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Untoward_Parable)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/36 "2012-10-04T22:23:30Z")

</div>

> [@FinnAgain](#):
>
> Being that you haven’t even really addressed, let alone responded to something that shows that Chomsky simply inventing and/or misreading a factual matter? That, in fact, you’ve repeatedly responded with non sequitors instead of a reasoned arument? I don’t think it’s the folks who you’re allegedly going to be debating against who don’t realize they’re losing an argument.

As far as this [http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/hitchens.htm](http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/hitchens.htm) source goes I don’t really understand why I would be expected to respond at all to it. It’s full of elipses and is only a criticism of Hitchens’ Defense of Chomsky that then uses Hitchen’s criticisms of Chomsky as a finale. Is Hitchen’s opinion good or bad? Is it good when it criticizes Chomsky but bad when it defends him? This is like arguing by the ‘telephone game’. If you want to criticize chomsky find the original source material so I can look at that without it being elipsed into unreliability. THis is not a relevant cite, it’s just someone with an ax to grind having fun with scissors.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FinnAgain](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/finnagain/32/12500_2.png) [@FinnAgain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FinnAgain)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/37 "2012-10-04T22:49:46Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> Regardless looking at their vast publications now, the USNI just look like another of the many military media entities that act as surrogates for the US military. Maybe it’s not their official public journal by way of non-profit semantic subterfuge but it seems to be exactly that.  
> […]  
> Everyone seems to have something Chomsky says that offends their sensibilities

Especially those of us who have an antipathy to bullshit.  
Tell us against how the USNI is the unofficial official journal of the United States Navy. Are there other unofficial official publications? Do they advertise? Or was Chomsky really right because it’s the Official Unofficial Journal of the United States Navy?

That’s it, isn’t it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2012, 11:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/38 "2012-10-04T23:57:51Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> I haven’t been dodging anything, i have a life, maybe you don’t, ill get to it when i get to it, of course if you cant understand simple logic i don’t know why i should even respond since it doesnt seem like you’ll even know when you’ve lost an argument.

The irony, it burns. You realize that ‘I have a life’ is the last refuge on the internet of those unable to come up with any kind of response. Well, next to last; ‘maybe you don’t have a life’ with the optional addition of ‘you must live in your momma’s basement’ is the last refuge. It’s been 3 days since you claimed to be looking through all of these sources.

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> Regardless looking at their vast publications now, the USNI just look like another of the many military media entities that act as surrogates for the US military. Maybe it’s not their official public journal by way of non-profit semantic subterfuge but it seems to be exactly that. They promote the Navy with leadership from the Navy, with funding from donors who support the Navy, with partnerships throughout the DOD and other surrogate entities.

What in the name of god have you been smoking? The USNI is not part of the US Navy, and _Proceedings_ is not the official journal of the US Navy. These are facts beyond dispute, as is the fact that Chomsky was 100% wrong when he called it such. Here’s a thought experiment for you: if _Proceedings_ was the official journal of the USN, what do you think would have happened to Commander Carlson when he submitted his article accusing the commander of the _Vincennes_ of gross negligence for publication?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dissonance](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/85f322/32.png) [@Dissonance](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dissonance)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2012, 12:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/39 "2012-10-05T00:03:08Z")

</div>

> [@Untoward\_Parable](#):
>
> As far as this [http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/hitchens.htm](http://www.mekong.net/cambodia/hitchens.htm) source goes I don’t really understand why I would be expected to respond at all to it. It’s full of elipses and is only a criticism of Hitchens’ Defense of Chomsky that then uses Hitchen’s criticisms of Chomsky as a finale. Is Hitchen’s opinion good or bad? Is it good when it criticizes Chomsky but bad when it defends him? This is like arguing by the ‘telephone game’. If you want to criticize chomsky find the original source material so I can look at that without it being elipsed into unreliability. THis is not a relevant cite, it’s just someone with an ax to grind having fun with scissors.

This is beyond hopeless; I’ve provided you with direct links to [Distortions at Fourth Hand](http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19770625.htm) on Chomsky’s own website [three](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15547043&postcount=9) [times](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15552051&postcount=20) now. You clearly are debating, if it can be called that, in bad faith.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2012, 1:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422/40 "2012-10-05T13:00:03Z")

</div>

> [@Dissonance](#):
>
> This is beyond hopeless; I’ve provided you with direct links to [Distortions at Fourth Hand](http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19770625.htm) on Chomsky’s own website [three](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15547043&postcount=9) [times](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=15552051&postcount=20) now. You clearly are debating, if it can be called that, in bad faith.

I agree- and this thread has taught me a lot I didn’t know about Chomsky.

The OP does not seem willing to accept or acknowledge even relatively small criticisms of Chomsky, so it seems pretty unlikely that he’d even consider significant ones like sympathy/rationalization of mass murder.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/chomsky-is-this-man-i-deeply-respect-a-bigot-and-a-sympathizer-for-certain-acts-of-genocide/636422.md?page=3)
