# Christian Science Monitor

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/christian-science-monitor/80165>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [September 7, 2001, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/christian-science-monitor/80165 "2001-09-07T01:55:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WEW](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/8edcca/32.png) [@WEW](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WEW)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2001, 1:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/christian-science-monitor/80165/1 "2001-09-07T01:55:50Z")

</div>

When I was in college, one of my “text books” for a poli-sci class was CSM. Our prof said it was considered the least biased newspaper in the country.

I read it then, and I just stumbled across them on the internet, and read most of the articles on their home page. They seem well written and to have good content.

So what the SD? Are they a legit new source?

MODS, should this go in IMHO?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bibliophage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bibliophage/32/7615_2.png) [@bibliophage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bibliophage)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2001, 5:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/christian-science-monitor/80165/2 "2001-09-07T05:24:00Z")

</div>

Yes, I think this would go better in IMHO, so I’ll move it.

bibliophage  
moderator, GQ

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bibliophage](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bibliophage/32/7615_2.png) [@bibliophage](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bibliophage)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2001, 5:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/christian-science-monitor/80165/3 "2001-09-07T05:27:32Z")

</div>

I always found it to be a top-notch paper, but I haven’t read it much for several years. The only problem with it is that it’s too short. The online version is at [http://www.csmonitor.com/](http://www.csmonitor.com/)
