Christians afraid of Christmas being co-opted

Actually this isn’t true. Granted there is nothing that I know of about Santa or Eggnog, there is something in the bible about trees:

Jeremiah Chapter 10:3-4

IIRC this is regarding an old pagan tradition that eventually morphed into the Christian Christmas tradition.

Here’s some more info:

Taken From Religious Tolerance.

Plus some origins:

And some surpising info on Santa Claus.

The way I see it this defines how it is co-opted, Santa & trees, it is now further coopted by the ‘Christmas buying season’ . And further still by the “holiday season”.

Also just because early Christinas didn’t honor the birth of Christ does not make it wrong, or ‘un-Christain’ to do so.

According to Christian tradition, Christmas is said to be the celebration of our Lord’s birthday, which was officially established by the Roman Catholic Church as December 25th. This claim is not supported by Scripture. Here’s why.

The Christmas story begins in Luke chapter 1 with a man named Zacharias, a Levite priest of the “course of Abia.”(verse 5) He and his wife, Elisabeth, had no child (she was barren), both were very old "…well stricken in years” (verse 7). While Zacharias was serving his course in the temple, the angel Gabriel appears to him (verse 11), and tells him he and his wife are going to have a child, a son, who’s name shall be John. (verse 13). Zacharias, knowing how old they both are, disbelieves, and the angel strikes him dumb. (verse 20). He finishes his course (two weeks), goes home to his wife, and she conceives.*
.
In the sixth month of Elisabeth’s pregnancy, the angel Gabriel is sent to her cousin, Mary (verses 26,27). He tells her that she is going to divinely conceive in her womb, “and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS….And he shall reign over the house of Jacob (Israel), for ever and ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end” (verses 31,33, 35)**. Mary conceives in Elisabeth’s sixth month of pregnancy (verse 36), which would make that January. If she bears Jesus nine months later, that would be October. In other words, going by the Biblical record, there is no way the Lord’s birthdate could have been December 25th. Although by this record we can ascertain the month he was born, there is nothing there that could give us a specific day. Could it be possible that God withheld this information for a reason? That maybe he didn’t want us (Christians) celebrating his Son’s birthday?

How was this day really established?

Sometime during the forth century, AD, Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire, thus supplanting centuries of pagan religious practices. This, however, did not stop the Romans from practicing their paganism, so the Roman church adapted. The most important pagan celebration of the year was the winter solstice, the climax of which was (wouldn’t you know it!) December 25th. This celebration (Saternalia) can be traced all the way back to the Babylonian empire and the year end nature ritual of the death of the old (the burning of the “Yule” log on the 24th), and the birth of the new (the miraculous appearing of the green tree in its place, which symbolized the Babyonian God, Nimrod.) The Roman church simply put Jesus in Nimrod’s place, claimed his birthday as the 25th, and, in effect, “Christianized” this pagan celebration. Protestants, for the most part, retained the practice in their religion.
"Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions." (Eccl 7:29) (KJV)

  • The course of Abia (See 1 Chron. 24:10), being the eigth course, would have occured the last two weeks in July. That means Elisabeth would have conceived John in late July, early August.
    ** Compare Isaiah 9:6,7

Visit Calcutta in October. It’s the Bengali equivalent of Christmas – there are such displays everywhere, some of them several stories tall.

“They fasten it (tree) with nails and hammer that it move not.”

Well, I would hope it wouldn’t try to move on its own! :eek:

Furt:

Well, I don’t have a problem with any of it because I’m a Christian, but no, they are not only words, they convey ideas, ideas that the government has no business declaring true. I was responding to Wrath’s point that since the government designates Dec 25 as a holiday and labels it “Christmas” then official government recognition of Jesus’ divinity is a done deal. (I trust you were only referring to government venues in your post.)

Wrath, I agree that most of the examples on your list amount to going too far (assuming the DtC is wrong about them being false or exagerrated), but even so their impact on the children’s overall enjoyment of the season has got to be pretty minimal. A list of incidents of people being allowed to observe Christmas would fill up the entire internet. Now I’ve got it in for political correctness just as much as for conservatism–in fact I consider PC to be a form of conservatism–but look who’s playing the vicitm even as they consolidate their grip on power in their bid to make Christianity the state religion.

The crux of the issue is the word “Christmas” itself. Should we re-define the word to exclude any association with Jesus Christ so that non-Christians can be wished a merry Christmas as well? Or should we embrace “Holiday” (or maybe bring back “Yuletide”) with “Christ Mass” meaning just the church service which is only one narrow, optional aspect of the season (and the least merry one at that). At any rate, a school is not a church.

Excellent posts by Acsenray and Zoe. Damn straight secularism means being neutral on religion.

How is it that a Christian is wished “Happy Hanukkah”? Was it said jokingly?

Very strange.

I tell the story in This thread , but I’ll summarize.

The young fellow who wished me a Happy Hanukkah didn’t know I’m a Christian. He was standing outside a bookstore with a friend, (presumably) wishing everyone a Happy Hanakkuh. I thought it was nice, so I thanked him and wished him a Happy Hannukkah back.

I live in an area with a large Jewish population, so they were probably safe in thinking they’d get a large response rate by wishing everyone a Happy Hanukkah. What makes me sad is that they assumed, probably correctly, that only a fellow Jew would return their greeting. Heck, I’m a nice guy, I appreciate anyone’s good wishes, and I do hope he had a Happy Hannukah. So why not return his greeting?

So, nothing strange about it; just something nice.

Frankly, I find this view astonishing. Under this rubric, the First Amendment is, in effect, impossible.

The government doesn’t take sides on matters of religious belief and people acting in their private capacity are allowed to believe and say what they want. Nothing could be more simple.

Santa Claus is not a religious belief, so it’s no problem. Jesus is a religious belief; put him on private property. If that offends you, then, really, my only conclusion is that you have no respect for the notion that I may choose to believe what I wish and live my life as I wish without interference from my neighbors.

You sure he wasn’t just clearing his throat? ;j

Cool. Someone tell John Ashcroft never to visit - he’d need a several stories tall drape. :smiley:

I would love nothing more that to visit India. If I ever do have the means to make it over there, I’ll make sure it’s in October :).