# Citizen's arrest

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [July 27, 2014, 8:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149 "2014-07-27T08:59:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aldiboronti](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9fc348/32.png) [@aldiboronti](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aldiboronti)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 8:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/1 "2014-07-27T08:59:48Z")

</div>

This week in Beverley Hills the cops advised people to make citizen’s arrests if Justin Bieber continued to hold parties which disrupted the neighborhood. Press sources added that in California “the system allows anyone who is not a police officer to arrest someone for a minor offence, a misdemeanor.”

If that’s correct it sounds decidedly odd. Does this mean that, for instance, if I saw someone attempting to abduct a child or rape a woman in California I would not be permitted by law to make a citizen’s arrest of the suspect? Here in the UK you can make a citizen’s arrest for any crime whatsoever (although you’d better be damn sure there are reasonable grounds for so doing.)

I’m just not getting the point of a citizen’s arrest for misdemeanors only.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cochrane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cochrane/32/10441_2.png) [@cochrane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cochrane)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 10:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/2 "2014-07-27T10:18:45Z")

</div>

It isn’t. Citizens may make arrests for any public offense, whether felony or misdemeanor.

California Penal Code Section 837 states

> [@](#):
>
> A private person may arrest another: (1) For a public offense committed or attempted in his presence. (2) When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his presence. (3) When a felony has been in fact committed, and he has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it.

A Public Offense is a felony, misdemeanor or infraction. I think the police were emphasizing that citizens may make an arrest for any offenses, no matter how minor, and that citizens arrests are not restricted to only major crimes. They were not excluding felonies from the list of offenses citizens can arrest someone for.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 10:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/3 "2014-07-27T10:21:18Z")

</div>

From [the Wiki](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizen%27s_arrest#State_statutes):

> [@](#):
>
> California Penal Code section 837 is a good example of this codification:
> 
> 1. A private person may arrest another:
> 
> For a public offense committed or attempted in his/her presence.  
> When the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in his presence.  
> When a felony has been in fact committed, and he or she has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it.

Let’s assume that’s accurate and correct. So, in answer to your query:

You would be permitted to effect a citizen’s arrest as abduction of a child and rape of a woman are, IIRC, both felonies in California.

The way I understand it, a law enforcement officer in California cannot make an arrest for the commission of a misdemeanor unless that misdemeanor is committed in the LEO’s presence. Regarding the arrest for felonies: since the LEO doesn’t have to be present when the felony is committed and felonies are (arguably) serious crimes, one may not wish, nor even be equipped, to arrest the purported felon whereas LEOs are generally have more stuff available to them than John Q. Public does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 11:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/4 "2014-07-27T11:01:17Z")

</div>

Just remember to follow the [proper procedures](http://www.bugmartini.com/comic/citizen-shame/).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![here\_and\_there](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f07891/32.png) [@here\_and\_there](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/here_and_there)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 11:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/5 "2014-07-27T11:41:48Z")

</div>

So a citizen can arrest another citizen for committing a crime, but can not arrest a policeman?

Did I understood that right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Monty](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/monty/32/47_2.png) [@Monty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Monty)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 12:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/6 "2014-07-27T12:08:21Z")

</div>

Nope. You misunderstood. A citizen’s arrest can be effected against _any person_ committing the offense. Now, how practical is it to arrest an armed police officer? Your best bet would be to avail yourself of the citizen’s complaint office (or whatever it’s called in your jurisdiction).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\
**Post date:** [July 27, 2014, 12:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/7 "2014-07-27T12:50:26Z")

</div>

> [@here\_and\_there](#):
>
> So a citizen can arrest another citizen for committing a crime, but can not arrest a policeman?
> 
> Did I understood that right?

It funny someone mentioned arresting an officer because I can’t hear the phrase citizen’s arrest without thinking of [this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9efgLHgsBmM).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![seal\_cleaner](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e274bd/32.png) [@seal\_cleaner](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/seal_cleaner)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2014, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/8 "2014-07-28T00:26:56Z")

</div>

My dad made a citizen’s arrest years ago. Drunk driver all over the road, finally stuck in a ditch. He held on to the guy until the cops came. The cop thanked him profusely until they were out of earshot of the perp, and told my dad, “Don’t you _ever_ do anything like that again.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lawbuff](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/13edae/32.png) [@lawbuff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lawbuff)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2014, 2:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/9 "2014-07-29T14:59:00Z")

</div>

> [@Monty](#):
>
> The way I understand it, a law enforcement officer in California cannot make an arrest for the commission of a misdemeanor unless that misdemeanor is committed in the LEO’s presence. Regarding the arrest for felonies: since the LEO doesn’t have to be present when the felony is committed and felonies are (arguably) serious crimes, one may not wish, nor even be equipped, to arrest the purported felon whereas LEOs are generally have more stuff available to them than John Q. Public does.

> **[California Penal Code Section 836 - California Attorney Resources -...](https://law.onecle.com/california/penal/836.html)**
>
> California state laws including the Business and Profession Code, Civil Code, Code of Civil Procedure, Commercial Code, Corporations Code, Education Code, Evidence Code, Family Code, Fish and Game Code, Health and Safety Code, Insurance Code, Labor...

aldiboronti, scroll down to the APPENDIX here. This decision was over ten years ago, so to get the updated law in each state, you have to look it up to correlate.  
[http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1408.ZO.html](http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1408.ZO.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/73ab20/32.png) [@md2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md2000)\
**Post date:** [July 29, 2014, 5:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/citizens-arrest/694149/10 "2014-07-29T17:55:49Z")

</div>

The point is that if you actually perform a citizen’s arrest, you better be damn sure a law was broken and you are arresting the person responsible. Otherwise, you are criminally and civilly liable for forcible restrain or confinement, assault, or anything else the victim can argue.

Hence the usual rule is you better have seen the offense yourself and be sure it happened and you have the right person.

(There was a case quite a few years ago, where someone accosted VP Cheney during a ski vacation in Colorado. As I understood it, there was a heated exchange - but no threats - and the two SS assigned to Cheney flagged down a third agent who hadn’t seen the incident. They pointed him in the direction of the departing person and told him to arrest the fellow because an assault on the VP had happened. When the fellow sued for wrongful arrest, the agent had to admit he had not seen the assault, the other agents denied an assault had taken place hung him out to dry. Lawsuit settlements ensued, so to speak.

the moral of the story - whether you are a policeman or a private citizen, you better be really sure you are right to be doing what you are doing.)
