# Claiming the word "Neocon" is antisemitic is just another Republican lie.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [June 2, 2003, 6:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079 "2003-06-02T06:02:26Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pencil\_Pusher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/b38774/32.png) [@Pencil\_Pusher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pencil_Pusher)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 6:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/1 "2003-06-02T06:02:26Z")

</div>

It has absolutely no basis in truth, and is totally unsupported. It was merely a ploy by the republicans because they don’t like the term and figured out a clever way to stop people from using it.

Discuss.

P.S. Since I’m asserting a negative (there are no facts to back up the neocon = antisemitic assertion), it would be silly to ask me for proof. Instead, proof is required for those who think there is a connection.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hazel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e56c9b/32.png) [@Hazel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hazel)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/2 "2003-06-02T06:06:32Z")

</div>

Huh? Has someone (who?) said that “neocon” is an antisemitic term?

Doesn’t seem possible. Isn’t it just a shortened form of “neo-conservative”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Brutus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/91b2a8/32.png) [@Brutus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Brutus)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 6:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/3 "2003-06-02T06:12:41Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Pencil Pusher \*  
> \*\*P.S. Since I’m asserting a negative (there are no facts to back up the neocon = antisemitic assertion), it would be silly to ask me for proof. Instead, proof is required for those who think there is a connection. \*\*

Who claims that ‘Neocon’ is antisemitic? You can provide a cite for that, no?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Marley23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Marley23](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Marley23)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 6:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/4 "2003-06-02T06:28:47Z")

</div>

I’ve heard people argue that the _position_ of opposing neo-conservatives is anti-semitic (since they tend to be VERY pro-Israel), but never the term itself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 6:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/5 "2003-06-02T06:49:27Z")

</div>

Well, here’s some of it, thoughtfully provided in another thread by **december**.

> **[What’s in a name?](https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2003/may/25/20030525-100933-7428r/)**
>
> Hitting at what may be a new low in the “neocon” code-word game, Business Week magazine recently ran a “news” story that practically screamed “Jew”— without saying the word at all.

> [@](#):
>
> Hitting at what may be a new low in the “neocon” code-word game, Business Week magazine recently ran a “news” story that practically screamed “Jew”— without saying the word at all.
> 
> \<snip\>
> 
> Ironically, nowhere in the article does one find “Jew:” or “Jewish,” although Mr. Dunham did manage to cite unnamed critics who have called the neocons a “Zionist cabal.” But that’s par for the code-word course. People who mean Jew or Jewish carefully avoid use of either word, often allowing the word “neocon” to roll off the tongue, injected with a tinge of disgust. Just as with Mr. Dunham, those who assail the “neocons” in the administration fault the supposedly all-powerful “Zionist cabal” as militarily trigger-happy idealists who will overextend American resources.

That gives a feel for it. If you criticise neocons, you’re Anti-Semitic, even if you don’t say anything about Jews or Judaism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f9ae1b/32.png) [@Drastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drastic)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 7:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/6 "2003-06-02T07:09:22Z")

</div>

So I guess the “unpatriotic” thing is starting to lose its glamour?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 8:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/7 "2003-06-02T08:29:59Z")

</div>

That’s a december tactic, I hardly think it is fair to smear Republicans in general with his behaviour.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 10:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/8 "2003-06-02T10:05:13Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Desmostylus \*  
> \*\*Well, here’s some of it, thoughtfully provided in another thread by **december**.
> 
> [http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20030525-100933-7428r.htmThat](http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20030525-100933-7428r.htmThat) gives a feel for it. If you criticise neocons, you’re Anti-Semitic, even if you don’t say anything about Jews or Judaism. \*\*

The Washington Times claimed that a particular Business Week article by Richard Dunham used “neo-con” to mean “Jew.” It would be well to read the [article](http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_19/b3832081.htm) itself before making up one’s mind, wouldn’t it? Does the article use “neo-con” to imply “Jew”? Consider these points: [ol][_]_“The close-knit intellectuals who make up the neoconservative movement have been called…-- and even a Zionist cabal.”\* A “Zionist cabal” translates into a Jewish conspiracy.[_]Dunham says, “The influence of the neocons runs deep in the Bush Administration.” If neo-cons are just conservatives, then the statement is almost a tautology. Obviously a conservative administration will be influenced by conservative POVs. [_]The article never defines “Neo-con”. That’s an important omission, since there no clear definition in general use. The people Dunham is describing do not call themselves a “neoconservative movement.” Donald H. Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney are described as _“two old-fashioned hawks [who] have become key allies.”_ Why are these two men not “neo-cons” themselves, but only “allies”? In what respect are they different from Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas J. Feith, and Richard N. Perle? [/ol]If you put “neocon Jew” into google, you get 765 hits [here](http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&edition=&q=neocon+Jew&btnG=Google+Search). Why not check them out before making up your mind?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 10:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/9 "2003-06-02T10:09:51Z")

</div>

It’s impossible to say, because it’s hard to prove motives. However, the fact that most people don’t even really understand what a neocon is, and then use it as a slur where the recipients just happen to mostly be Jewish… Well, it does raise some eyebrows.

One British politician complained that Blair was getting advice from neo-con Jews, and Pat Buchanan has been going on about a neocon cabal of Jews. Those are the only two firm examples I can think of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hazel-rah](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/73ab20/32.png) [@hazel-rah](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hazel-rah)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 10:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/10 "2003-06-02T10:15:49Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> **december** : If you put “neocon Jew” into google, you get 765 hits.

If you put “neocon Hitler” into google, you get 1690 hits. Odd, that. However, I feel I must warn you **december** … I googled “neocon december” and got 9120 hits.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/original/2X/e/e489c3b7d8fce19c4b355dd4fc3f88cc39c34b87.png) [@system](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/system)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 10:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/11 "2003-06-02T10:24:28Z")

</div>

Well, the clear challenge in this is that the reality is the core of what we may call neo-conservatism by chance has a large number of thinkers who happen to be Jewish. Further to that, on a few foreign policy points these fellows, who tend to have Zionist leanings, have some clear FP prejudices, so to speak, that are not divorced from their particular understanding of their cultural-religious heritage.

Given in the US the structure of political parties and associations mitigates against the emmergence of clear sub-groupings – e.g. in another political system the neo-cons might be a political party – there is bound to be confusion.

As to december: someday I would hope that the concept of simple minded google searches not being apropos to anything at all might seep into the fabric.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 10:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/12 "2003-06-02T10:55:45Z")

</div>

You also have to figure that neocons would mostly be non-Christians. Neoconservatism lacks the religious fundamentalist leanings of traditional conservatism. So it’s only natural that conservative Jews would be drawn to it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 11:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/13 "2003-06-02T11:36:37Z")

</div>

Stop making stuff up, **adaher**.

Provide proof if you can to back up this nonsense. Otherwise stop posting in Great Debates and go to In My Humble Opinion, where no-one gives a toss.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 11:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/14 "2003-06-02T11:45:10Z")

</div>

Which part do you want me to back up?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Captain\_Amazing](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/6de8d8/32.png) [@Captain\_Amazing](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Captain_Amazing)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 12:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/15 "2003-06-02T12:12:52Z")

</div>

Well, traditionally, neo-conservatives were anti-communist foreign policy hawks, many of them former socialists or communists , and a lot of them are/were Jewish, like Norm Podhorez, Saul Bellow, and Seymor Martin Lipset. A lot were non-Jews, though…Kirkpatrick, Moynahan, and Huntington, for example. So I don’t know how fair the neo-con=Jew association is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Desmostylus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c57346/32.png) [@Desmostylus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Desmostylus)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 12:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/16 "2003-06-02T12:19:06Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by adaher \*  
> \*\*Which part do you want me to back up? \*\*

The entirety of your post.

Why would “you also have to figure that neocons would mostly be non-Christians”?

Show that “neoconservatism lacks the religious fundamentalist leanings of traditional conservatism”.

Demostrate that “it’s only natural that conservative Jews would be drawn to it”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![athelas](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5e9695/32.png) [@athelas](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/athelas)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 12:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/17 "2003-06-02T12:20:48Z")

</div>

What are neo–conservatives anyway?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smiling\_bandit](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9a140/32.png) [@smiling\_bandit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smiling_bandit)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 12:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/18 "2003-06-02T12:29:55Z")

</div>

I think I’m supposed to be one and _I_ don’t know the answer to that question. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bosda_di_chi_of_tricor/32/16845_2.png) [@Bosda\_Di\_Chi\_of\_Tricor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bosda_Di_Chi_of_Tricor)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 12:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/19 "2003-06-02T12:30:07Z")

</div>

Actually, a “Neocon” sounds like it should swear alliegence to Megatron, transform into an assault vehicle, & attack Optimus Prime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![december](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/838e76/32.png) [@december](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/december)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2003, 12:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079/20 "2003-06-02T12:58:42Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by Collounsbury \*  
> Further to that, on a few foreign policy points these fellows, who tend to have Zionist leanings

When “Zioninst” is used n this context, it’s a pejorative term for “Jew”. Accusing neocons of having “Zionist leanings” is similar to calling someone a “Nigger-lover.”

> [@](#):
>
> As to december: someday I would hope that the concept of simple minded google searches not being apropos to anything at all might seep into the fabric.

I just thought you might want to do some research on the subject before you pontificated. Guess I just forgot that you already knew everything. Sorry.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/claiming-the-word-neocon-is-antisemitic-is-just-another-republican-lie/179079.md?page=2)
