# Cleavage at church wedding

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [April 9, 2012, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217 "2012-04-09T01:15:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![alice\_in\_wonderland](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alice_in_wonderland/32/176_2.png) [@alice\_in\_wonderland](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/alice_in_wonderland)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2012, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/41 "2012-04-10T22:02:03Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> That is a very modest dress. This is a mis-post or something, right?

Nope - that’s cleavage.

My point in posting that particular dress is that cleavage doesn’t have to mean this:

[![](http://urbangrounds.com/wp-content/uploads/Wedding_dress_boobs.jpg) ](http://urbangrounds.com/wp-content/uploads/Wedding_dress_boobs.jpg)

You can absolutely see the cleave between Kate Middleton’s dress in the first pic - there just aren’t boobs hanging out all around it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![swampbear](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/swampbear/32/467_2.png) [@swampbear](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/swampbear)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2012, 10:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/42 "2012-04-10T22:15:50Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> And Beaver Cleavage is a definite no-no.

I agree. Always hated that little brat. What?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zsofia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/7bcc69/32.png) [@Zsofia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zsofia)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2012, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/43 "2012-04-10T23:04:52Z")

</div>

> [@ftg](#):
>
> That is a very modest dress. This is a mis-post or something, right?

Look, if I wore that dress you’d be all “Holy fucking shit, June is busting out all over! Doesn’t she have a _mirror_ at home?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PandaBear77](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/edb3f5/32.png) [@PandaBear77](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PandaBear77)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2012, 12:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/44 "2012-04-11T00:13:41Z")

</div>

As long as they’re not totally hanging out it’s ok. Your wedding day is the ONE DAY a girl should be able to show off the girls in church and not get hassled.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ArrMatey](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/arrmatey/32/3522_2.png) [@ArrMatey](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ArrMatey)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2012, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/45 "2012-04-11T00:20:42Z")

</div>

> [@GuanoLad](#):
>
> Having sex on the altar is frowned upon. Apart from that, anything goes, depending on tradition, religion, and personal proclivities.

Oh man, _that’s_ why I got kicked out!

…How was I to know there was a wedding scheduled?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ethilrist](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ethilrist/32/4604_2.png) [@Ethilrist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ethilrist)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2012, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/46 "2012-04-11T01:14:40Z")

</div>

> [@Zsofia](#):
>
> Kate Middleton did not have cleavage. You have to have tits to have cleavage. (Sorry, Cathy.)

I was gonna say…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cumberdale](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/8c91f0/32.png) [@Cumberdale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cumberdale)\
**Post date:** [April 11, 2012, 1:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217/47 "2012-04-11T01:36:57Z")

</div>

If the bride is comfortable with it, go for it. The “church”, as in so many other aspects, is irrelevant.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/cleavage-at-church-wedding/618217.md?page=2)
