# Closing the Senate, what's the big deal?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [November 2, 2005, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124 "2005-11-02T18:39:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/1 "2005-11-02T18:39:47Z")

</div>

Since I’m sure this will end up in the pit, I’ll spare the mods the time.

[http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/02/senate.iraq/index.html](http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/02/senate.iraq/index.html)

> [@](#):
>
> “This is an affront to me personally,” said Frist, a Tennessee Republican. “This is an affront to our leadership. It is an affront to the United States of America, and it is wrong.”

There were similarly made comments about this whole ordeal.

Can some one tell me _why_ this made such a big stink?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 6:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/2 "2005-11-02T18:50:30Z")

</div>

> [@World Eater](#):
>
> Can some one tell me _why_ this made such a big stink?

Because they took away the crybaby’s sandbox and forced him to do his damned job.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plnnr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7ea924/32.png) [@plnnr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/plnnr)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/3 "2005-11-02T19:01:21Z")

</div>

The actual act of going into closed session isn’t that big a deal. I beleve Frists’ panties got in a twist over the way the Democrats used the process to draw attention to the issue of bungled intelligence.

Reid and the Dems only have 44 votes. They can (and should) hammer the issue every day, but that only gets them so far. Reid’s manuever of calling the Senate into closed session, without first consulting with the body’s leadership (which isn’t required under Senate rules but is traditionally done), was seen as a violation of the trust, gentility, and good ol’ boy way the Senate operates.

As was pointed out by a blogger in todays WP, the Senators themselves will care much more about the stunt (and what a terrific stunt it was) than the average joe.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BobLibDem](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/boblibdem/32/3149_2.png) [@BobLibDem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BobLibDem)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/4 "2005-11-02T19:08:16Z")

</div>

What exactly is the point of closing the doors if it’s on TV anyway? So nobody sees it live and in person. Big whoop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 7:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/5 "2005-11-02T19:08:51Z")

</div>

> [@plnnr](#):
>
> The actual act of going into closed session isn’t that big a deal. I beleve Frists’ panties got in a twist over the way the Democrats used the process to draw attention to the issue of bungled intelligence.
> 
> Reid and the Dems only have 44 votes. They can (and should) hammer the issue every day, but that only gets them so far. Reid’s manuever of calling the Senate into closed session, without first consulting with the body’s leadership (which isn’t required under Senate rules but is traditionally done), was seen as a violation of the trust, gentility, and good ol’ boy way the Senate operates.
> 
> As was pointed out by a blogger in todays WP, the Senators themselves will care much more about the stunt (and what a terrific stunt it was) than the average joe.

The world would be a better place if CNN or Fox would offer this simple explanation to the masses. Makes perfect sense now.

I think Frist should go fuck himself with his hijacking the senate comment. His boys own the place, lock, stock, and key.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scott\_Plaid](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Scott\_Plaid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scott_Plaid)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 7:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/6 "2005-11-02T19:09:44Z")

</div>

If he repeats enough times that it shouldn’t have been done, and that it is unfair, people will start believing it, and reject all proof to the contrary.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spavined\_Gelding](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/958977/32.png) [@Spavined\_Gelding](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spavined_Gelding)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/7 "2005-11-02T19:41:06Z")

</div>

> [@Scott Plaid](#):
>
> If he repeats enough times that it shouldn’t have been done, and that it is unfair, people will start believing it, and reject all proof to the contrary.

When has that tactic ever worked before? Other than Al Gore inventing the internet, John Kerry being a shirker in Vietnam, Bill Clinton making a shady profit on the White Water deal, Saddam “seeking to obtain” uranium in Africa, Iraq’s possession of unconventional weapons and inclination to give them to Osama. Other than those time when did it work?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mollie\_Magill](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mollie_magill/32/20882_2.png) [@Mollie\_Magill](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mollie_Magill)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 7:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/8 "2005-11-02T19:41:15Z")

</div>

Hell, they got more done in those two and a half hours than I think they’ve doen in a while.

Maybe Reid should call for a closed session more often.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hamster\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8edcca/32.png) [@The\_Hamster\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hamster_King)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/9 "2005-11-02T21:00:49Z")

</div>

> [@World Eater](#):
>
> Can some one tell me _why_ this made such a big stink?

It’s also a warning shot in the upcoming Alito confirmation battle. The Republicans keep making noises about the “Nuclear Option” – using technicalities in the Senate rules to thwart a Democritic filibuster. Reid’s action yesterday is basically him saying to Frist: “You wanna use loopholes in the rules to shut us down? Well, two can play that game.”

A lot of what keeps the Senate running smoothly is a gentlemen’s agreement between the two parties to cooperate in moving legislation through the pipeline. But over the last few years the Republicans have consistently violated the spirit of that agreement: holding votes open indefinitely to scare up additional support, blocking the Democrats from participating in committees, abruptly shutting down hearings, and so on. None of these things are explicitly against the rules of the Senate, but they go against the spirit of collegeality that is supposed to prevail in the Senate chambers.

Reid is reminding the Republicans that the minority party has the power to really screw over the majority party if the minority party feels like it’s being shut out of the process.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/10 "2005-11-02T21:09:09Z")

</div>

> [@Pochacco](#):
>
> It’s also a warning shot in the upcoming Alito confirmation battle. The Republicans keep making noises about the “Nuclear Option” – using technicalities in the Senate rules to thwart a Democritic filibuster. Reid’s action yesterday is basically him saying to Frist: “You wanna use loopholes in the rules to shut us down? Well, two can play that game.”

> [@](#):
>
> Reid is reminding the Republicans that the minority party has the power to really screw over the majority party if the minority party feels like it’s being shut out of the process.

Again, what power? The power to kick out cameramen?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CynicalGabe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/3e96dc/32.png) [@CynicalGabe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CynicalGabe)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/11 "2005-11-02T21:10:47Z")

</div>

It just gave the Republicans another excuse to play the victim.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpauler](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9d8465/32.png) [@stpauler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/stpauler)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/12 "2005-11-02T21:16:15Z")

</div>

In a closed session, can they only talk about the one issue? If so, I can see how that would really be a power play.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/13 "2005-11-02T21:19:12Z")

</div>

For some reason my post got munched.

I was asking what the difference is between a closed an open session. Basically the Dems are saying we can make the Repubs lives miserable, so play nice. But kicking out the tourists and camera people every day doesn’t seem to be much for a power play does it? I guess what I’m saying is I don’t see a closed senate as more then an inconvinience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![plnnr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/7ea924/32.png) [@plnnr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/plnnr)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/14 "2005-11-02T21:31:08Z")

</div>

Here’s what can (and can’t) happen during a closed session:

[http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/Standing\_Rules\_Senate.htm#21](http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/Standing_Rules_Senate.htm#21)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kalhoun](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/3bc359/32.png) [@Kalhoun](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kalhoun)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/15 "2005-11-02T21:37:46Z")

</div>

> [@plnnr](#):
>
> Reid’s manuever …was seen as a violation of the trust, gentility, and good ol’ boy way the Senate operates.

Yeah…funny how this is so important when it’s THEIR collective tit in the wringer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/16 "2005-11-02T21:40:20Z")

</div>

> [@Spavined Gelding](#):
>
> When has that tactic ever worked before?.. Other than those time when did it work?

Iowa irony. Bitter, yet somehow…wholesome!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hamster\_King](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8edcca/32.png) [@The\_Hamster\_King](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hamster_King)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/17 "2005-11-02T21:52:45Z")

</div>

> [@World Eater](#):
>
> But kicking out the tourists and camera people every day doesn’t seem to be much for a power play does it? I guess what I’m saying is I don’t see a closed senate as more then an inconvinience.

When the doors close they stay closed while the business at hand is discussed. Normally Senators and their staff can come and go during the legislative day and work on a variety of matters. Closing the doors forces the attention of the entire Senate onto a single topic. And since it doesn’t require a vote to close the doors, only a motion and a second, it only takes two senators to trigger.

Basically Reid shut down the Senate for several hours and forced it to debate the Bush Administration’s failures. According to the Senate rules he could do so every day if he thought it was appropriate. The only thing stopping him is the gentleman’s agreement between the two parties to play nice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![World\_Eater](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f04885/32.png) [@World\_Eater](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/World_Eater)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/18 "2005-11-02T22:47:10Z")

</div>

> [@Pochacco](#):
>
> Basically Reid shut down the Senate for several hours and forced it to debate the Bush Administration’s failures. According to the Senate rules he could do so every day if he thought it was appropriate. The only thing stopping him is the gentleman’s agreement between the two parties to play nice.

I think I’m getting it, but a few more questions.

Are the doors physically closed as in locked? Does it affect just the people who are in the room at the time, or do senators have to drop what they’re doing and head towards the chambers? Lastly, who decides when the doors are “unlocked”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/19 "2005-11-02T23:01:10Z")

</div>

Short exposition on [Rules on Closed Senate Sessions](http://talkleft.com/new_archives/012964.html)

The [Senate Rules](http://rules.senate.gov/senaterules/menu.htm) themselves (#'s 21, 29, 31 are relevant here)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Syntropy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/65b543/32.png) [@Syntropy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Syntropy)\
**Post date:** [November 2, 2005, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124/20 "2005-11-02T23:12:48Z")

</div>

[Speaking of irony…](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/01/AR2005110101037.html)

> [@](#):
>
> The usually unflappable majority leader, Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), was searching for words to express his outrage to reporters a few minutes later. The Senate “has been hijacked by the Democratic leadership,” he said. “They have no convictions, they have no principles, they have no ideas.”

BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA… Oh. Ow. Really, Senator Frist. It hurts to laugh that hard.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/closing-the-senate-whats-the-big-deal/329124.md?page=2)
